similar to: [LLVMdev] Possible memory leakage in the LLVM JIT Engine

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Possible memory leakage in the LLVM JIT Engine"

2009 Mar 22
0
[LLVMdev] Possible memory leakage in the LLVM JIT Engine
Hi, Was this ever resolved? I'm curious, I'm also in a situation where there may be many (very many) JITted functions over the history of an application (which may be running for many days) Thanks On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:34 AM, George Giorgidze wrote: > Hi, > > In my application I am JITing thousands of functions, though I am > doing it sequantially and running only
2004 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
Reid Spencer, thank you for your quick responce, finally i got to my PC at home. You wrote: > Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, > "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and > "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences > should be instructive on what to do. You were
2004 Aug 09
5
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
Valery, Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences should be instructive on what to do. You were really, really close .. just a few details changing. The code in "reid.cpp" compiles but I
2004 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, "reid.cpp" > which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and "diffs" which shows > the differences between them. The differences should be instructive on what to > do. You were really, really close .. just a few details changing. The
2008 Aug 19
7
[LLVMdev] Please help with LLVM C++ integration
Hi Gordon, I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? Thanks in advance. Kirill. int some_test_func( int ){ std::cout << "!!!!" << std::endl; return 8848; } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]){ Module *M = new Module("test"); ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new
2008 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Please help with LLVM C++ integration
Hi Kirill, Don't forget to add X86TargetMachine.obj (add to Additional Dependencies in Linker options, if you are using MSVS) otherwise LLVM will try and use Interpreter instead of JIT. Hope this helps, Rob. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of kirill havok > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008
2008 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Please help with LLVM C++ integration
kirill havok wrote: > Hi Gordon, > I wrote a small example, but while running I get an error("Tied to > execute an unknown external function"), where I am wrong? > I think the problem is that some_test_func() is a C++ function, so its name is being mangled during compilation. To fix it, I think you want to add a declaration telling the compiler to treat some_test_func()
2004 Aug 09
1
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
Valery, First response of several. I don't know why the demo page at UIUC is unavailable but there is an enhanced copy of it running on the mirror at http://llvm.x10sys.com/demo/ if you ever need it. Running it produced the following LLVM equivalent for the C code in your example. implementation ; Functions: int %add1(int %x) { entry: %tmp.1 = add int %x, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
2004 Aug 10
1
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
Valery, Your JIT sample program has been added to projects/HowToUseJIT. I have defaulted the license to the standard UIUC license. Let me know if that's not okay and I'll fix it. If you continue to work on this (providing a command line option to use either interpreter or JIT would be nice), please provide patches against these files and I'll commit them for you. Here's the
2004 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
Reid wrote: > I have to agree with Misha on this. None of us knows "everything" about > LLVM and as you can see, Misha responded three hours before I did :). > Asking questions here is encouraged, so please feel free to post them on > LLVMdev. We'll always help where we can. well, OK :) Please find the attachment with the first approach to such an example i've
2004 Aug 09
3
[LLVMdev] API on JIT, code snippets
Valery, I have to agree with Misha on this. None of us knows "everything" about LLVM and as you can see, Misha responded three hours before I did :). Asking questions here is encouraged, so please feel free to post them on LLVMdev. We'll always help where we can. Thanks, Reid. On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 06:37, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:32:33PM +0400, Valery
2004 Aug 13
3
[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized ? ..
> If it's that slow, you're probably getting the interpreter instead of the > JIT. Try adding -print-machineinstr to the command line, or -debug, and > see what happens. If you're not getting the JIT, try stepping through the > LLVM program to see where it makes the execution engine and decides which > one to use... (thanks for quick reply) hm, here is the part of my
2020 Feb 24
2
segfault with HowToUseJIT
Hi! I've started looking porting our application which uses LLVM JIT to using LLVM 9 (9.0.1). To begin, I tried running the HowToUseJIT.cpp (example directory) program and it fails with a segfault: ./HowToUseJIT We just constructed this LLVM module: ; ModuleID = 'test' source_filename = "test" Running foo: Segmentation fault (core dumped) Running it through GDB:
2008 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Please help with LLVM C++ integration
On Aug 19, 2008, at 13:36, kirill havok wrote: > I got very interested in LLVM project, and I decided to start > writing my own scripting language based on it. By studying the > documentation, I could not find how to call external function, > written in C. That is, I have a set of functions written in C/C++, I > generate code, using LLVM C++ interface, how can I call(or
2010 Mar 06
1
[LLVMdev] Last chance to get anything into llvm-c and ocaml bindings
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:53 AM, George Giorgidze <giorgidze at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Erick, > > Can you make the following functions available in llvm-c. > > createStandardFunctionPasses > createStandardModulePasses > createStandardLTOPasses > > Thanks in advance, George This is a little tricky, so I need some advice from the community. First off, I'm
2008 Aug 19
5
[LLVMdev] Please help with LLVM C++ integration
Hello, I got very interested in LLVM project, and I decided to start writing my own scripting language based on it. By studying the documentation, I could not find how to call external function, written in C. That is, I have a set of functions written in C/C++, I generate code, using LLVM C++ interface, how can I call(or register in machine in run-time) my external functions? Maybe I just missed
2003 May 03
2
Memory leakage?
Hi, all: I'm using R 1.7.0 on WinXP under SDI mode. However, very often after I closed all R windows, my CPU usage was still 100%. By checking the task manager, I found there are one or several "Rgui.exe" still running and took all the CPU. I had to close them one by one manually. This happened to me with R 1.6.1, R 1.6.2 also and also on Win2K. Rememeber there was a
2004 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized ? ..
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > hm, here is the part of my code starting LLVM function: > > /////////////////////////// > ExistingModuleProvider* MP = new ExistingModuleProvider(M); > ExecutionEngine* EE = ExecutionEngine::create( MP, true ); As Reid pointed out, changing true to false will get it to work. > // Call the `foo' function with no
2010 Mar 02
3
[LLVMdev] Embedding LLVM
Is there a guide anywhere to embedding LLVM into a program to compile and run a DSEL? Thanks, Sean
2004 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized ? ..
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > (thanks to Reid, who gave nice advice) the fibonacci function code > works now. Please find attached file. > > but... the performance is adequate, say, for byte-code > interpretation mode and not for optimized JITing. > fibonacci function of 35 from attached file is more > then 100 times slower then the following code compiled