similar to: [LLVMdev] GSoC09 potential participant

> > I am wondering about the status of GSoc this year. The mailing list seems to be rather quiet on the topic. Has anyone thought of project ideas? > We just received confirmation that LLVM was accepted for this year GSoC. > The ideas list, as usual, is placed at > http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html (it also contains links to > subproject's ideas pages). > > Please

Hi, I am wondering about the status of GSoc this year. The mailing list seems to be rather quiet on the topic. Has anyone thought of project ideas? -- Kasra :-D

>>> I am wondering about the status of GSoc this year. The mailing list seems to be rather quiet on the topic. Has anyone thought of project ideas? >> We just received confirmation that LLVM was accepted for this year GSoC. >> The ideas list, as usual, is placed at >> http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html (it also contains links to >> subproject's ideas pages).

Hello > I am wondering about the status of GSoc this year. The mailing list seems to be rather quiet on the topic. Has anyone thought of project ideas? We just received confirmation that LLVM was accepted for this year GSoC. The ideas list, as usual, is placed at http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html (it also contains links to subproject's ideas pages). Please consider looking into

Dear all, The information about accepted projects for this year was just announced. Please look at http://socghop.appspot.com/org/home/google/gsoc2009/llvm for comprehensive list of them. SoC students: first of all, I would like to congratulate you with acceptance of your proposals! You did great job answering to comments and refining your proposals! Now it seems you can update the texts of your

Hello, everyone. Writing the application for gsoc is around the corner, is there any application template for syslinux ? I'm handling it. Thanks.

Rodrigo, On Mar 20, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote: > Congratulations to LLVM for getting accepted to GSoC 2009! > > I am a PhD candidate interested in participating this year. I have > been > working on dynamic compilation (binary translation or BT) for > multicore > architectures for a couple of years. I am familiar with the > internals of > several

Filipe Cabecinhas wrote: > Just a thought... How are you going to port llvm so it doesn't use libc? > Valgrind uses the same resources as the running program, so it can't use > the system libc's malloc nor any other functions so it doesn't get > "confused". I think you could to put LLVM into a different process. >> I think I'm the one who put

Hi, Congratulations to LLVM for getting accepted to GSoC 2009! I am a PhD candidate interested in participating this year. I have been working on dynamic compilation (binary translation or BT) for multicore architectures for a couple of years. I am familiar with the internals of several BT frameworks (including open-source Valgrind). I was looking at the ideas page for LLVM. I would like to

On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 8 September 2015 at 19:20, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> Youtube has been discussed in the past but we have usually defaulted to >> mainly hosted on llvm.org and then a copy could potentially be on YouTube. I >> would want this to be an official

Hi, Just a thought... How are you going to port llvm so it doesn't use libc? Valgrind uses the same resources as the running program, so it can't use the system libc's malloc nor any other functions so it doesn't get "confused". Regards and let's hope this project is accepted :-) F Owen Anderson wrote: > Rodrigo, > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 8:41 AM,

Hello! I am new to R (before used python exclusively and would actually call the R solution for this issue inside a python notebook, hope that doesn?t disqualify me right of the batch). Right now I am looking for a piece of software to fit a 1D data sample to a mixture of t-distributions. I searched quite a while already and it seems to be that this is a somehwat obscure endeavor as most

I have a function t.test.cluster for which R CMD check results in a documentation warning because its argument names don't match those of t( ). Is there a way around this error besides renaming the function? Will this disqualify a package from admission to CRAN? How did t.test avoid this warning? Thanks, Frank --- Frank E Harrell Jr Prof. of Biostatistics & Statistics

Would package "teigen" help? Ranjan On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:41:34 +0200 vare vare via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > Hello! > > I am new to R (before used python exclusively and would actually call the R solution for this issue inside a python notebook, hope that doesn?t disqualify me right of the batch). > > Right now I am looking for a piece of

Offlist, because this is (a) an opinion and (b) about statistics and therefore offtopic. I don't know whether any such package exists, but I would predict that this is likely to be overdetermined (too many parameters) and therefore unlikely to be a successful strategy. Fitting a mixture of Gaussians is already difficult enough. Feel free to ignore, of course, and no need to reply. Cheers,

Dear Community, I'm working on a project for Google Summer of Code, to implement the ABCD and Bitwidth analysis in LLVM. I'm not going to extend the description of the project here, this link shows my proposal http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~andrelct/projects/gsoc_2009/proposal. I have been in some discussions on this list about Ada and SSI that helped on my decisions up to this

I don?t see how neither a) or b) applies to this question nor the technical merit of the remark about mixture models. Do you have a suggestion for a more appropriate forum for this issue/question? (stackoverflow basically sent me here). Kind regards > On 29. Jun 2017, at 16:58, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Offlist, because this is (a) an opinion and (b)

Google Summer of Code has announced the opening of applications for Mentor organizations. Pamela Fox mentioned awhile ago that Mapstraction may be a good fit. http://socghop.appspot.com/ I would like to brainstorm if we have identifiable projects, and preferably even interested students, that would like to work together on putting in some applications. A couple of initial possibilities: -

Dear Nicolas, I'm curious why you are using ABCD in vmkit. Do you need any features from static array bounds checking? As far as I know, SAFECode has a number of implementation for that. Thanks. Haohui On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 20:48 +0200, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Dear Andre, > > That's great! Thanks for the blog. I am really looking forward into > using ABCD in vmkit!

Hi， John Criswell！ You have said to me that SAFECode had not been maintained for several years, now I have submitted my proposal for updating the SAFCode project to the new LLVM APIs. If you are still interested in the topic and willing to guid my project, I will be very happy. Now I'm waiting for you comments. Here is my proposal: