similar to: [LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] trouble building gcc-frontend from source

Hi, the versions of llvm-gcc and llvm you are using are not synchronized. Probably one is from subversion while the other is not. Ciao, Duncan.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, the versions of llvm-gcc and llvm you are using are > not synchronized. Probably one is from subversion while > the other is not. > > Ciao, > > Duncan. > Ok, I 'synchronized' both of them, but now I am getting a different error. On running make, the output ends with the

Gautam Sewani wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, the versions of llvm-gcc and llvm you are using are >> not synchronized. Probably one is from subversion while >> the other is not. >> I've run into this, too. The problem is that the inliner pass uses a 30 bit integer to store the inline

Hi, > $ ../llvm-2.5/configure --prefix=/pkg/bin/llvm/ > CC=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/gcc CXX=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/g++ > CXXCPP=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/cpp LDFLAGS=-L/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/lib64/ > CXXFLAGS=-I/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/include/c++/4.2.4/ > CPPFLAGS=-I/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/include/ how about: export PATH=/pkg/bin/:$PATH ../llvm-2.5/configure --prefix=/pkg/bin/llvm/ instead? Ciao,

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:09 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Gautam Sewani wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> >>> Hi, the versions of llvm-gcc and llvm you are using are >>> not synchronized. Probably one is from subversion while >>> the other is not. >>> >

I am still having problems getting everything installed. I realized that the successful build of llvm-2.5 had in fact been configured to use the system gcc (4.1.2). However, I was unable to sucessfully build llvm-gcc with gcc 4.1.2. I went back and attempted to build llvm-2.5 with gcc-4.2.4 (installed in a separate directory from system gcc). However, I got the same build error as before. Then I

Thanks for the suggestions. It looks like Duncan's suggestion got me a step closer, but I still can't build llvm-gcc... On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Christian Sayer <Christian.Sayer at dibcom.fr> wrote: > did you try a simple > > $ ../llvm-2.5/configure --prefix=/pkg/bin/llvm/ > CC=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/gcc CXX=/pkg/bin/gcc-4.2.4/bin/g++ Tried that, same error.

Hi, > Ok, I 'synchronized' both of them, but now I am getting a different > error. On running make, the output ends with the following error: please don't only reply to me, please reply to the list too. That way others can comment, and the discussion is archived. > cc1: /home/gautam/code/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/InlineCost.h:44: >

On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Gautam Sewani wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:09 PM, John Criswell > <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: >> Gautam Sewani wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, the versions of llvm-gcc and llvm you are using are >>>> not

I have problem compiling the gcc frontend. Almost everything seems to compile but at the very end when crt startup files are compiled, the assembler complains about bad registers. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Thanks, Robert HOST: os: ubuntu 2.6.18 kernel x86_64 GNU/Linux compiler: gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5) SOURCE: svn trunk gcc4.2 CONFIGURE:

Hi everyone, I am a masters student at IIIT- Hyderabad, India. I have submitted my GSOC proposal for Xen in a Box. I would be great to have some suggestions especially about the porting of xapi on CentOS Abstract: My project goal is to deliver set of scripts preferrably in bash, along with all necessay packages to convert standared installers ISOs into customized ISOs which install CentOS 6 +

i am trying to add auto migration feature in XEN. so is anyone has worked related to migration part. i need help regarding files related to migration. -- Regards Gautam _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, I am a masters student at IIIT Hyderabad, India. I am writing a GOSC proposal for CentOS organization. It's about delivering a custom installer ISO which delivers Xen 4.4 stack on CentOS 6. full proposal: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/public/google/gsoc2015/gautam_malu/5629499534213120 I want to port xapi on CentOS 6 as part of it. There has been some previous efforts to

Hi I am not able to have a working tcltk library in R-2.2.1 inspite of trying different options suggested in the FAQ's. I am using the following configure option and I do get the tcltk package installed but with a missing libs folder. ./configure -prefix= "~R-2.2.1" --enable-R-shlib --enable-linux-lfs --with-zlib --with-gnu-ld --with-tcltk

Hi, I am Masters student at IIIT Hyderabad, India. I have made a set of scripts to make a customized installer ISO which installs Xen4.4 + CentOS 6.6. I have tested it on a Xen HVM VM. I would be great if anyone can test it out. https://github.com/gautammaloo/centos-xen Best regards, Gautam Malu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Jan 1, 2011, at 8:29 PM, akramul azim wrote: > Hi, > I am planning to follow the steps to install LLVM for the ARM-target (Processor: Xscale, Architecture: armv5te): > > 1. Install binutils-2.21 (downloaded from gnu.org) > > Steps: > > $ ./configure --target=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi --program-prefix=arm- --prefix > =/llvm/arm

> On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Easwaran Raman" <eraman at google.com> >> To: "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Cc: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at

Hi, After r256521 - which removes InlineCostAnalysis class - I think there is no strong reason for InlineCost.cpp to be part of the Analysis library. Is it fine to make it part of TransformUtils? I submitted r266477 (which has now been reverted) that made Analysis depend on ProfileData in order to obtain ProfileSummary for the module, but there is an existing dependency of ProfileData on

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > The difference between Analysis and Transforms is *not* about passes, but > about what the code *does*. > > Code for mutating the IR should be in Transforms, and code that analyzes > the IR without mutating it should be in Analysis. This is why, for example, > InstructionSimplify is in

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Glad that works for you, but it means that if the 32-bit cost >>> computation overflows, we won't be told about it. I think the right >>> thing is to make sure the computation saturates at 30