similar to: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > From: Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 4:20 PM > On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Kasra wrote: > > I guess the

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 4:17 PM > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Kasra > <kasra_n500

--- On Tue, 2/3/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Cc: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com > Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2009, 2:52 PM > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen

On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Kasra wrote: > I guess the backends could know about the instructions. But I am not > convinced why it is beneficial not to have ROR and ROL instructions > within llvm. > How would it be beneficial to have them, if we already generate them at the target level properly? Adding instructions "just because" doesn't seem wise. -Owen

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Kasra <kasra_n500 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > I guess the backends could know about the instructions. But I am not convinced why it is beneficial not to have ROR and ROL instructions within llvm. > I guess I could ask you the opposite question: What is the benefit of having these? They would have to be mappable to the source language in some way. I'm

On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >> instructions to LLVM? > > Not sure what you mean: He's referring to the LLVM IR, I think, and it's true that doesn't have

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >>> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >>> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >>> instructions to LLVM? >>

Hi, I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these instructions to LLVM? The reason that I am asking is for cryptographical algorithms which are becoming ever more important rotation is a major operation. Thus including such instruction could reduce 3 instructions {shl, shr, or} into {rol | ror} which could gain

On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: > I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find > ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these > instructions to LLVM? Not sure what you mean: $ cat t.c unsigned int rol(unsigned int i) { return i << 1 | i >> 31; } mrs $ clang -S t.c -O2 mrs $ cat t.s .text .align 4,0x90 .globl _rol

Dale Johannesen wrote: >On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >>> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >>> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >>> instructions to LLVM? >> >> Not sure what you mean: > > He's referring to the LLVM

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> I guess I could ask you the opposite question: What is the benefit of >> having these? They would have to be mappable to the source language in >> some way. I'm not sure about Ada, but I don't know of a "rotate" >> operator for any of the C variants, or

Hi Bill, > I guess I could ask you the opposite question: What is the benefit of > having these? They would have to be mappable to the source language in > some way. I'm not sure about Ada, but I don't know of a "rotate" > operator for any of the C variants, or any other high-level language.. Ada has rotate. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi all, Is it planned to add support of rotations to IR? Thanks, Aleksey Zasenko -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151119/c897b935/attachment.html>

--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand > To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc..edu> > Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 8:29 AM > On 2009-01-30 18:19, Kasra wrote: > > Hi All, >

Hi everybody hacking in the 200-pre4 i found everything i needed, so i gave it a try ... and it works! But dont blame for the code, its just quick and dirty! --- ../syslinux-2.00-pre4/pxelinux.asm Sat Jun 15 07:25:51 2002 +++ ./pxelinux.asm Wed Aug 14 10:05:00 2002 @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ ; version; incorporated herein by reference. ; ;

I am trying to get a ROR app running on a linux box running Apache 1.3 at my hosting comapny, but cannot get it running. There is a fresh/clean ROR app in the base directory / .htaccess, dispatch.cgi, dispatch.fcgi and dispatch.rb are all in / All dispatch files have been set to 755. ROR docs say to point doc root at /public/ and to put .htaccess, dispatch.cgi, dispatch.fcgi and dispatch.rb

On 2009-01-30 18:19, Kasra wrote: > Hi All, > > I was looking into using LLVM with C++. Currently there is almost no C++ support (C support only). > LLVM is written in C++, has a C++ API, and llvm-gcc frontend can compile C++ programs. What exactly is the C++ support you are missing? Best regards, --Edwin

Hi, I have been away from the list for a while, so do apologize in advance if the topic is slightly off topic here. I have started a hobby project to create a virtual OS library (jos). The idea was to create a set of C API's for operating system specific tasks i.e. File IO, threading and etc. For example: typedef jos_handle jos_thread; jos_thread jos_thread_create(...); void

Hi everyone, After a long back I am again using ROR,Could you please anyone can help me how to invoke the client side resources such as scanners and printers using ROR? Actual requirement is the user scans a document(containing 10 to 100 pages) in his client machine(here the whole document should be in one file like pdf or tif, not individual files) and the preview the document to be shown for

I had a similar problem with a backend for the 68HC12 family which also has no barrel shifter. Some 68HC12 CPUs support shift for just one of the 16-bit registers and only support rotation on the 2 8-bit subregs of that 16-bit register. That means the only practical solution for 32-bit shifts is to lower to a libcall but my situation for 16-bit shifts sounds similar to yours for 32-bit shifts. I