similar to: [LLVMdev] Register variables

Hello! I have been considering using LLVM for my compiler project for some time now, and have been extensively researching its capabilities. However, I have come to a sticking point that I cannot solve. My language is a multi paradigm language, but with the emphasis on "functional". As such, it is expected that programs will allocate a lot of small, short-lived data. This means, in

Török Edwin wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: > >> On Apr 13, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Török Edwin wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In PR2193 LiveVariables runs out of memory on a 512M limit, after >>> processing 11557 basicblocks. >>> VirtRegInfo has ~180000 entries with ~700 bytes each. >>> If I give it more memory

Well, the stack pointer be a single byte, so pushing things on there doesn't work terribly well. Assuming I pass by reference, that's 128 values absolutely total before it wraps around and silently clobbers itself. It means single byte values will be incredibly inefficient... Tricky stuff. I'm lucky on the C64 since it's rare to exit back to the kernel with machine language apps

I suppose that once you've got a 6502 working, adding support for a 4510 shouldn't be too difficult.... (http://c65gs.blogspot.com.au/) On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Edwin Amsler <edwinguy at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, the stack pointer be a single byte, so pushing things on there

does anyone get a hold of the SPA-941 Provisioning Guide? i tried call Sipura's tech support, seems like none of them heard of the term "remote provisioning". they kept refering me to their web site which i've check thoroughly, and could not find any documentations on the SPA-941. finally they gave me a phone number to call, which appears to be a fax machine. that's when i

On 28 March 2014 11:16, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Just the reserved part. Ok, in that case, I share you concerns. We could easily only implement the reserved ones (stack pointer being the case in hand). If there is any mad reason why allocatable ones should be used (I heard glibc uses R8 for some special things, haven't confirmed myself), we can discuss

On 2009-11-16 23:42, John McCall wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> On 2009-11-16 22:46, John Criswell wrote: >> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> My initial message (containing the patch) was a private reply to John. >>>> >>>> Attached the patch again, it applies with 'patch -p0'. >>>> >>>> Also try to

As you know, HVM save/restore broke recently because restored config miss guest memsize that used by xc_hvm_restore to locate some pfn. After discussion, we decided to remove the pfn deduction logic from restore side by adding a general memory layout. I have a patch for it. But then qemu broke, because it also require the memsize to locate the share page. We can''t use the previous

On 28 March 2014 10:17, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > This has been the long standing historical objection to the feature. It is a > *really* invasive change to the register allocator to plumb this kind of > register reservation through it. Do you mean only the reserved part or the general named register idea? About reserving registers, we already have the

On Apr 13, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > Hi, > > In PR2193 LiveVariables runs out of memory on a 512M limit, after > processing 11557 basicblocks. > VirtRegInfo has ~180000 entries with ~700 bytes each. > If I give it more memory (1.5G) it runs out of memory in LiveInterval. Some of the information kept by LiveVariables are somewhat redundant and can be removed. I

Bill Wendling wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Hi Bill, thanks for fixing it. >> >> > No prob! :-) I can't build llvm-gcc4.2 on x86-32 Linux. What is kext64, and how do I disable it? (I suppose I don't need it on a 32-bit platform?) ..... ranlib kext/libgcc_eh.a

Hi, I've troubles with setting up Asterisk Realtime and MD5 authentication. With clear text passwords everything is working fine. -- Registered SIP 'edwin' at 10.0.0.37 port 5060 expires 600 -- Saved useragent "Cisco-CP7940G/8.0" for peer edwin [2007-01-15 10:18:12] DEBUG[28528]: res_config_mysql.c:651 mysql_reconnect: MySQL RealTime: Everything is fine.

This was a question asked last week on the IRC channel. I was on holiday and no one else was around at that time of the day to answer it ... < edwin> [Wed 19:27] hi < edwin> [Wed 19:28] libguestfs-test-tool says "sh: mkisofs: not found" on Debian, it is supposedly replaced by genisoimage. How do I proceed about gathering debug info on why guestfs

Evan Cheng wrote: > On Apr 13, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> In PR2193 LiveVariables runs out of memory on a 512M limit, after >> processing 11557 basicblocks. >> VirtRegInfo has ~180000 entries with ~700 bytes each. >> If I give it more memory (1.5G) it runs out of memory in LiveInterval. >> > > Some of the

Hi, I have run make check in llvm/test, and I got a FAIL. Also first time I run the test I ran out of space on /tmp (which is a 1G sized tmpfs). See output below. Please let me know if I should try any patches, etc. llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/home/edwin/llvm-svn/llvm/test' ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; \

Below the trojaned and clean md5s are given. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:39:22 +0200 From: Magnus Bodin <magnus at bodin.org> To: Wojtek Pilorz <wpilorz at bdk.pl> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Re: openssh-3.4p1.tar.gz on ftp.openbsd.org changing rather than frozen On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote:

Hello, I have the similar issue in estimating a GARCH model with exogenous variables in the mean equation. Currently, to my understanding, the garch function in tseries package can handle univariate model, and garchFit in fGarch can handle ARMA specification. I wonder if there is any R function that can handle exogenous variables in estimating GARCH? Thank you a lot. Edwin -- View this

On 2011-02-14 20:58, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2011-02-14 20:39, Talin wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org >> <mailto:rengolin at systemcall.org>> wrote: >> >> I think this deserves a blog post... >> >> I'd like to wait until I get some feedback - I don't know yet if

Oh, and I updated the MIME types on the docs, so now you can read them online here: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llbrowse/trunk/doc/LLBrowse.html 2011/2/14 Talin <viridia at gmail.com> > OK I figured out what the problem was - I assume you are trying to compile > under Snow Leopard? There is a problem with linking against wxWidgets > because the prebuilt binaries for

OK I figured out what the problem was - I assume you are trying to compile under Snow Leopard? There is a problem with linking against wxWidgets because the prebuilt binaries for wxWidgets are compiled in 32-bit mode, and the default compilation mode in Snow Leopard is 64 bits. See this article for an explanation: http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Development:_wxMac#Building_under_10.6_Snow_Leopard