Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] building llvm-gcc-4.2 with llvm installed"
2008 Aug 11
5
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran
compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error...
c++ -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -mdynamic-no-pic -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \
2009 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: enable multilib build on x86_64-apple-darwin
Chris,
Thanks. I am going to update the fink llvm and llvm-gcc42
packages I maintain to the 2.6 release so this will help. Is
clang updated in unison with llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 and is there
much new that isn't in Xcode 3.2's clang? I was considering
creating clang packaging for fink as well (if the releases
were coordinated and the c++ support was decent yet).
Jack
On Thu,
2007 Dec 28
2
[LLVMdev] fink llvm-gcc42 test packaging
I've created fink packaging for a building the llvm
and llvm-gcc-4.2 svn pulls under fink on Mac OS X. Hopefully
the fink info script and patch should be clear enough for
some comments on my build approach. The llvm-gcc and llvm-g++
compilers seem okay so far. The llvm-gfortran compiler seems to
always spew a warning..
WARNING: 128-bit integers not supported!
...even when just compiling a
2011 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
failing here with...
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm-gcc42-2.9-0/llvm_gcc42_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/llvm-gcc42-2.9-0/llvm_gcc42_objdir/./prev-gcc/ -B/sw/lib/llvm-gcc-4.2/x86_64-apple-darwin10/bin/ -c -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
2008 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] polyhedron 2005 results for llvm svn
Anton,
I didn't have to time to do fresh set of benchmarks for
llvm-gfortran from 2.4 and current gcc trunk. I'll do that
this weekend. However I suspect I'll see similar behavior
as before. Compared to FSF gcc 4.2, llvm-gfortran will show
improvements but it won't be as impressive compared to
gcc trunk. Is there a projected date for supporting the
vectorization in llvm for the
2010 Apr 11
7
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:52:18PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> > Is anyone building dragon-egg on darwin?
>
> Anton built it once. There were some problems with dynamic libraries: gcc's
> plugin support requires the use of dynamic libraries, and the configure logic
> it uses thinks that darwin does not support dynamic libraries! So it is
>
2010 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Hi Jack,
> bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make
> g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\" -DTARGET_NAME=\"x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0\" -I/Users/howarth/llvm_svn/dragonegg
2013 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] error: unable to get target for 'armv5', see --version and --triple.
Current llvm svn fails make check when built for only x86...
[100%] Running the LLVM regression tests
FAIL: LLVM :: DebugInfo/inlined-vars.ll (3994 of 7466)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: DebugInfo/inlined-vars.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm33-3.3-0/llvm-3.3/build/bin/./llc -O0 <
2013 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] error: unable to get target for 'armv5', see --version and --triple.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> Current llvm svn fails make check when built for only x86...
Ah, right, need to put that behind a "requires"... hrm. (or I could
just drop it & let the machines that are armv5 native catch this)
>
> [100%] Running the LLVM regression tests
> FAIL: LLVM ::
2010 Apr 11
1
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:29:28AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
>> bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make
>> g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\"
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] regression in llvm 3.4 branch
On x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing regressions in the current
llvm 3.4 release branch during 'make check'...
Scanning dependencies of target check-llvm
[100%] Running the LLVM regression tests
FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll (1362 of 9265)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
2013 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > This file is for configure+make build, not CMake, so I'm not sure why
> > it's being included into your build (these failures aren't
> > reproducible for me).
> > Can you please list the exact steps you're doing to build
2013 Mar 20
1
[LLVMdev] error: unable to get target for 'armv5', see --version and --triple.
I hope this is addressed by r177545 - please let me know if this test
is still failing for you after that change.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:38 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
>> Current llvm svn fails make check when built for only x86...
>
> Ah, right, need to put
2010 Apr 10
3
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
Is anyone building dragon-egg on darwin? I am trying
to build against the fink gcc45 package that I have prepared
for darwin and a updated fink llvm 2.7 package that is built
as...
../llvm-2.7/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/llvm --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/share/info --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr --with-system-zlib --with-as=/Developer/usr/bin/as
2012 Oct 31
2
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin
> > specific polly-test regressions exist. At least part of these failures appear to be due
> > to lli on darwin not accepting
2013 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
Jack,
Where do the "-isysroot
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk
-mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your
CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this
being done on purpose?
I can add a CMake step checking whether the current CFLAGS/LDFLAGS
allow to build an
2010 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] darwin dragon-egg build issues
On 04/10/2010 08:01 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> bash-3.2$ GCC=/sw/bin/gcc-4 CC=gcc-4 CXX=g++-4 CFLAGS=-I/sw/include CXXFLAGS=-I/sw/include LLVM_CONFIG=/sw/lib/llvm/bin/llvm-config make
> g++-4 -c -I/sw/lib/llvm/include -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -MD -MP -DIN_GCC -DREVISION=\"100954M\"
2013 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Reminder] LLVM 3.4 Release Branching
+Bob Wilson
I don't know if this is a recent Apple regression, or if it's now catching
something which had always been invalid.
-bw
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > This
2012 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> >> > While testing llvm/polly svn on
2012 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] undefined symbols in AddressSanitizer tests on darwin
At 167457 on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing a slew of AddressSanitizer failures due to
unresolved symbols such as...
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"___asan_init", referenced from:
_asan.module_ctor in shared-lib-test-so-moBSTe.o
"___asan_register_globals", referenced from:
_asan.module_ctor in