similar to: [LLVMdev] clang installation

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com> wrote: > This patch adds targets to support the installation of clang in isolation. > > Ok? > +ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),install-clang) + DIRS := tools/clang/Driver tools/clang/lib/Headers tools/clang/tools/ccc Is "tools/clang" the official name of the clang development directory? I was still using

Hi Terry, Reid is exactly right about the benefits of static (link-time) optimization for whole programs. When all libraries are available, it could alllow significantly better optimization without run-time overhead. But it is increasingly common today for libraries to be dynamically linked. In these cases, you could get the benefits of LLVM optimization in two ways, *if* you compile the

Hi, I just updated from source and got this at the top of the master Makefile: LEVEL = . DIRS = lib/System lib/Support utils lib ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),tools-only) DIRS += tools else ifneq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),libs-only) DIRS += runtime docs OPTIONAL_DIRS = examples projects endif endif This causes my build to be incorrect. In the general case, it doesn't build the tools, and

Good evening, Michael. 2010/9/5 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>: > Do you know what the exact problem is? It would be best to fix the > Makefile instead of moving it. And sense it is a transformation, the > build system is broken if you _have_ to move it. I am sorry, I don't understand what *the exact problem" is. I can describe facts; - Hello is the only

On Mar 19, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > What is kext64, and how do I disable it? Comes from: APPLE_LOCAL='APPLE LOCAL libcc_kext' \ MULTILIBS="`$(GCC_FOR_TARGET) --print-multi-lib` static;@static at fno-pic kext;@Dmal loc=kern_os_malloc at Dfree=kern_os_free at DLIBCC_KEXT@static at fno-pic@fno- exceptions at fno-non-ca

The opus code default compiles on -o2 optimization level. I would like to change it to -o3. I have tried doing the changes in makefile.unix . The change is not getting reflected. I am building the code in Code composer studio for TI processor C6000. Could anybody help me with this -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, The attached patch adds the jcheck target equivalent to make check, but that can run with a -j flag ($ make jcheck -jX). It does not interfere with the regular check, but rather builds on top of the check-one target: it first generates a list of tests to run using RunLLVMTests, and then run those tests according to the supplied -j flag, invoking the check-one target for each one of them.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:26:02AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:24:17PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: > >> I haven't tested with objdir != srcdir. > > > > Ok, that was broken. Attached is a smaller diff that should work in > > all > > cases. > > This

On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >> build_llvm) into the top-level directory. > > Why not: > > $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make > echo Apple Build.

On Feb 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:24:17PM -0800, Julien Lerouge wrote: >> I haven't tested with objdir != srcdir. > > Ok, that was broken. Attached is a smaller diff that should work in > all > cases. This sounds really cool Julien! Two questions: 1) does it preserve the checking that the existing tcl stuff does, which

On 06/27/12 07:24, Journeyer J. Joh wrote: > Hello, > > With your kind concern and help, I now can make a binary for ARM target. > > ./clang -v --save-temps -ccc-host-triple arm-none-linux-gnueabi > --sysroot=/home/hum/Documents/Projects/arm_toolchain/arm-2010.09/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc > -gcc-toolchain /home/hum/Documents/Projects/arm_toolchain/arm-2010.09 > hello.c -o

2009/1/28 Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com>: > Author: mrs > Date: Tue Jan 27 20:43:35 2009 > New Revision: 63168 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=63168&view=rev > Log: > Add a preliminary version number. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/Driver/clang.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/Driver/clang.cpp > URL:

On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >>> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.

Hi all, this is the tenth version of the patch series to introduce upstream qemu and seabios in the xen-unstable build system. Changes to v9: - rename QEMU_UPSTREAM_TAG to QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION: we are going to use it with a branch name by default; - set QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION to "master" by default; - set SEABIOS_UPSTREAM_URL to git://xenbits.xen.org/seabios.git by default; - add

Hello, With your kind concern and help, I now can make a binary for ARM target. ./clang -v --save-temps -ccc-host-triple arm-none-linux-gnueabi --sysroot=/home/hum/Documents/Projects/arm_toolchain/arm-2010.09/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc -gcc-toolchain /home/hum/Documents/Projects/arm_toolchain/arm-2010.09 hello.c -o hello The build command is shown above. After that, I prepared an ARM laptop,

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 2, 2008, at 4:39 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> Another perspective on this sort of issue, if you haven't seen it: >> http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2007/10/ >> tablua_fracta.html. > > If we apply their logic to llvm, we can dominate, if we just target 8 > cores. :-)

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 17, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Scott Michel wrote: > > - remove trailing whitespace, > > - expand tabs to spaces, > > I'd argue for not changing anything, just fail it. > Trimming whitespace is innocuous, at best. Expanding tabs to spaces, I might be inclined to agree is a 'fail' since

Hi, I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these instructions to LLVM? The reason that I am asking is for cryptographical algorithms which are becoming ever more important rotation is a major operation. Thus including such instruction could reduce 3 instructions {shl, shr, or} into {rol | ror} which could gain

I'm toying with building with -mdynamic-no-pic, but for this to work, the shared library bits in llvm can't be built with that flag. I've found that: Index: Makefile.rules =================================================================== --- Makefile.rules (revision 71041) +++ Makefile.rules (working copy) @@ -472,6 +476,9 @@ ifneq ($(DARWIN_MAJVERS),4) LD.Flags += $(RPATH)

Hello list, I wonder if llvm/Clang can compile C or C++ for ARM from on x86. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/8896 The talk above answered 'NO' to my question, which means Clang is not yet able to cross compile for ARM on X86. Is the answer still correct for my question? I saw somewhere that Clang supports ARM on Darwin only. Then is the cross compiling