similar to: [LLVMdev] insertAfter method Patch

Thomas B. Jablin wrote: > Hi, > I have added an insertAfter method to the ilist and Instruction classes. The methods are implemented as efficiently as the currently existing insert and insertBefore methods. The insertAfter method was created to mirror a similar method in another compiler in order to ease an ongoing port. The patch, which is very small is included as AddInsertBefore.patch.

John Criswell wrote: > Small nitpick: in Instruction.cpp, the comment for insertAfter says > insertBefore and not insertAfter. > :) > > -- John T. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > Thanks for spotting

Jon, > You want: > TaintVar->insertAfter(FirstI); This worked! Thank you. On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > On 8/25/16 7:01 AM, Shehbaz Jaffer via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> I tried an alternative way of adding instruction by first getting the >> first instruction of the basic block, and then

I am having difficulty in replicating a sequence of instructions (2+, with def-use dependencies within) and inserting them at a different location. I have tried a few different approaches (IRBuilder, new Instruction(), I->clone(), insertBefore/insertAfter,etc.), all leading to the same error msg: "Instruction doesn't dominate all uses" The DevList has a few previous

Ryan Taylor wrote: > Since there are no constructors for Value, how do you properly insert a > new Value? Value is a pure base. If you want to construct a new Value, then you want to construct a global variable or instruction or argument or something in particular. > If I create a pointer Value *newValue and then call > AA.copyValue(oldValue, newValue), this does not work, since

Hi llvm-devel, I have migrated my codebase from llvm-3.6 to llvm 3.8.1-stable. Although I was able to resolve most of the problems, I am facing issues resolving the following: To insert an instruction immediately after the first instruction within a basic block, I first get all instructions in my basic block in an instruction container list. Once that is done, I insert my new instruction in the

Nick, First, thanks for responding. Secondly, I just want to create an exact copy of an already exisitng Value, this should be pretty simple to do but I'm unclear on how to do this? For example, PHINode::getIncomingValue (unsigned) returns a "Value" and I want to make a copy of that Value. Is there some other way to do this other than copyValue() that I'm missing? On Sat,

Hi, I also want to insert a function call at the interested area, and do something in the called function which is written by myself. First you need to determine the INSTRUCTION where you want to insert your function to. you can do this by writing some code like, for (Function::iterator BI = F.begin(), BE = F.end(); BI != BE; ++BI) for(BasicBlock::iterator II =

On 5/2/11 11:59 AM, Chuck Zhao wrote: > I am having difficulty in replicating a sequence of instructions (2+, > with def-use dependencies within) and inserting them at a different > location. > > I have tried a few different approaches (IRBuilder, new Instruction(), > I->clone(), insertBefore/insertAfter,etc.), all leading to the same > error msg: > "Instruction

Since there are no constructors for Value, how do you properly insert a new Value? If I create a pointer Value *newValue and then call AA.copyValue(oldValue, newValue), this does not work, since newValue is not allocated. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120203/44086cf5/attachment.html>

Why not just use Instruction::insertAfter()? I->insertAfter(new_inst); On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Try incrementing the iterator before using. > > On Sep 5, 2016 10:26, "Simona Simona via llvm-dev" < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Daniel

Hi, I am instrumenting a piece of code. I want to insert a function call at the interested area, and do something in the called function which is written by myself. I have succeed on implementing the pass, and getting the instrmented code. However, I am not sure where to put this function, and what kind of linkage I should use for this function. Currently I use External linkage which is

Dear All, Should this patch be committed now? I just did a quick read-over of it when it was first submitted. -- John T. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Thomas B. Jablin" <tjablin at CS.Princeton.EDU> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] insertAfter method Patch Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:58:34 -0500 (EST) Size: 4813 URL:

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Simona Simona via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to add a new instruction after a given instruction in a basic >> block. >> Until LLVM 3.7, I was using the following code:

Hi all, Recently I have implemented a transformation pass based on LLVM3.5 and its function is to duplicate the function's argument list in a bytecode file and replace all use of original function with modified function. In LLVM3.5, the pass can work properly. However, when I tried to transplant the pass to LLVM3.9, the error "Argument value does not match function argument type!"

Hello, I'm trying to add a new instruction after a given instruction in a basic block. Until LLVM 3.7, I was using the following code: BB->getInstList().insertAfter(I, new_inst); [where both I and new_inst are Instruction*] In LLVM 3.8 however, the SymbolTableList was created as a wrapper over iplist. Could anyone please tell me how I can do the same type of insertion in LLVM 3.8?

Hi, The insertion of DBG_VALUE instructions for spills does not seem to be handling insert locations inside bundles well. If the spill instruction is part of a bundle, the new DBG_VALUE is inserted after it, but does not have the bundling flags set. This essentially means that if we start with a set of bundled instructions: MI1 [BundledSucc=true, BundledPred=false] MI2 [BundledSucc=false,

Given a segment of a MachineBasicBlock containing the instructions [MI4, MI5, MI6] at an arbitrary point, what would be the best way to change this segment with the same instructions in a different order, say, [MI5, MI6, MI4]? I looked into splice(), but it was impossible to hold iterators that remained valid before and after the splicing. I tried erase/remove() with insert/insertAfter(),

Hi again, Here is a small patch to fix this issue. Please note that since the problem results in broken bundles, it can result in invalid schedules for any VLIW back-ends using bundling to group instructions. Best regards Saurabh Verma From: Verma, Saurabh Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 4:14 PM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: DBG_VALUE insertion for spills breaks bundles Hi, The

On Oct 6, 2011, at 17:19, Yiannis Tsiouris wrote: > Hello all, > > I set: InitRoots = true; in my gc plugin as i want the roots to be > initialized to the "null" value. > Is there a way to define which value should be the initial one? For > example, i would like to initialize my roots to -5 (tagged, null value > for the GC in my runtime system) instead of 0. >