similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm doesn't build

2009/1/28 Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com>: > Author: mrs > Date: Tue Jan 27 20:43:35 2009 > New Revision: 63168 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=63168&view=rev > Log: > Add a preliminary version number. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/Driver/clang.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/Driver/clang.cpp > URL:

Hi Piortr, This also breaks the hand-built VC++ project. Any clues on where I should define this? Thanks, snaroff -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 7.png Type: image/png Size: 13645 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090202/eb726ff5/attachment.png> -------------- next part

I'm seeing a build failure... In file included from /Volumes/mrs5/net/llvm/llvm/lib/VMCore/ Attributes.cpp:14: /Volumes/mrs5/net/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Attributes.h: In member function 'llvm::Attributes llvm::AttrListPtr::getParamAttributes(unsigned int) const': /Volumes/mrs5/net/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Attributes.h:152: error: 'assert' was not declared in this scope

This patch adds targets to support the installation of clang in isolation. Ok? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: clang-2.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 952 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090119/39061b42/attachment.obj> -------------- next part --------------

The input language is at assembly level, and the location akin to a %temp ( a virtual register if you will) and contains moves from one virtual to another. Though these are not like memory but I could represent them as local variables and do loads and stores; so I dont know how to represent it in C except as local variables. On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com>

Hi, I'm trying to run the tests in llvm-suite, but I've run into trouble. First, I had the llvm-suite checkout in a directory alongside the llvm compiler checkout, but, when I ran "make" from llvm-suite, it complained about there not being a Makefile two levels above it, so I moved llvm-suite into the "test" subdirectory inside the llvm compiler checkout. I ran

Hi Bill, > Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. Ciao, Duncan. > > -bw > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Did

On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >> build_llvm) into the top-level directory. > > Why not: > > $ RC_ARCHS="x86" make > echo Apple Build.

/Volumes/SandBox/clang/clang/clang/unittests/VMCore/MetadataTest.cpp: In member function 'virtual void<unnamed>::MDNodeTest_Everything_Test::TestBody()': /Volumes/SandBox/clang/clang/clang/unittests/VMCore/MetadataTest.cpp: 76: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict- aliasing rules :-(

On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >> instructions to LLVM? > > Not sure what you mean: He's referring to the LLVM IR, I think, and it's true that doesn't have

On Mar 19, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Thanks, Mike! I applied this to the tree. No, you applied something else to the tree! :-) I had a space before the \ and after the ". The below should fix it. Doing diffs in .: --- ./Makefile.in.~1~ 2008-03-19 15:45:54.000000000 -0700 +++ ./Makefile.in 2008-03-19 16:30:07.000000000 -0700 @@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ libgcc.mk:

> Hi Tanya, > > I do not really understand this strict rule :-) > While I get it from a CVS perspective, in Subversion > this is simply overkill. For making a branch you simply > select a revision X, do a "svn -rX up", test, > if successful, you do "svn info ." and use the URL > to make a repo -> repo copy: > > svn cp -rX URL BRANCHURL > >

On May 9, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > While you are correct is is not usually a problem, that assumes that > I do > not check in any changes. If I check in X and someone checks in > something > (Y) that should not go into the release, If they are checking in something, trivially, they want it to go into the release. If they didn't want it in,

Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? -bw On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> writes: > >> I'm not sure if this makes a difference but I ran this >> >> make -j 2 -k LLVMCC_OPTION=clang ENABLE_BUILT_CLANG=1 ENABLE_PARALLEL_REPORT=1 TEST=simple report > ../../report.txt 2>&1 > > That does indeed seem to get me further. Thanks!

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Stuart Hastings wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Oct 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Stuart Hastings wrote: >>> Currently, to get LLVM to build "Apple-style," it's necessary to >>> copy two files (utils/buildit/GNUmakefile and utils/buildit/ >>> build_llvm) into the top-level directory.

On Mar 19, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > What is kext64, and how do I disable it? Comes from: APPLE_LOCAL='APPLE LOCAL libcc_kext' \ MULTILIBS="`$(GCC_FOR_TARGET) --print-multi-lib` static;@static at fno-pic kext;@Dmal loc=kern_os_malloc at Dfree=kern_os_free at DLIBCC_KEXT@static at fno-pic@fno- exceptions at fno-non-ca

On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: > >        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ > > for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 2, 2008, at 4:39 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> Another perspective on this sort of issue, if you haven't seen it: >> http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2007/10/ >> tablua_fracta.html. > > If we apply their logic to llvm, we can dominate, if we just target 8 > cores. :-)