similar to: [LLVMdev] "Phishing Attack" Solved

I am compiling svn head LLVM at the moment and I keep getting requests for password, which never used to occur before, followed by: Connection closed by 147.32.84.4, which is some site in Amsterdam. This occurs at this point in the make execution: make[3]: Entering directory `......./llvm/lib/Target/X86' Is this genuine, or has someone hacked the code and inserted some phishing attack into

This appears to be not as bad as I first feared. I had been using llvm previously on a remote machine and for some inexplicable reason a fresh compilation on my local machine wanted to make a connection to the remote one, in the context of: Updated Intrinsics.gen because Intrinsics.gen.tmp changed significantly. Though why this should be necessary, or useful, is beyond me.

[ Sorry, I did not see the renamed thread until I'd already replied on the old one. Calling this a phishing attack is exactly right. ] On 2010-01-30, Joachim Schipper wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you argue that connecting to malicious > hosts is currently secure, and will remain secure, but that it will > become easier to convince people to send the passphrase for

Yes it is true and the very reason why i want all my Google Group Friends to be aware of the latest scams. They are not listed on the Scam Buster sites simple because they go unnoticed , well people like me get duped though. Please read <http://workfromhomedepot.blogspot.com/2008/02/latest-email-scam-fraud-phishing-online.html>and forward to all the people you care for. -- Yours Sincerely

Did anyone else just get what looks like a phising attempt pretending to be from digium? It appears to be full of links to http://app.en25.com/e/er.aspx I must admit, it looks genuine.

> A problem with that, it's a bit cumbersome. You have to realize what the > cause of the problem, so that adding the flag will fix it (why is ssh > failing anyway?). And then check the exact syntax. And write that, on the > command-line. It is another option though. Personally, I set IdentitiesOnly yes as the global default in ~/.ssh/config, and explicitly set the preferred key

FYI/Heads up, I /just/ received what looks like a phishing attempt for information about Open Source PBX usage. It says it comes from Digium but all the links (including the one for digium.com) point elsewhere. Rod --

Hello, In response to the timing analysis attacks presented by Dawn Song et. al. in her paper http://paris.cs.berkeley.edu/~dawnsong/ssh-timing.html we at Silicon Defense developed a patch for openssh to avoid such measures. Timing Analysis Evasion changes were developed by C. Jason Coit and Roel Jonkman of Silicon Defense. These changes cause SSH to send packets unless request not to,

My belief is that this is not possible, but there are many extremely knowledgeable people participating on this list and I would like to know if it is in fact possible. I am running CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) fully updated. Browser is Mozilla Firefox v.3.0.7. I believe both times this happened, once yesterday and once today, I was surfing on the web site of my favorite singer/musical group; or in the

Hi, I am just starting a new project. I found that the above script rejects Autoconf versions later than 2.59, whereas it ought to accept them, imho. I had to edit the scrip to be able to use it with Autoconf 2.61. Also, aclocal gave the following warning: /usr/share/aclocal/oaf.m4:4: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_OAF /usr/share/aclocal/oaf.m4:4: run info '(automake)Extending

On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Biggs wrote: >> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. > I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security in the absolute sense, but they slow the attacker down, and that might

Dear all, I've been struggling for days now with a piece of code that I have posted here before, that has a really obscure bug. I think I may have isolated it, but I have no idea what it is.... It might also be a bug in R I guess, as it seems that one or several of list elements are not passed when a function is called, but quite rarely. I have been hacking rather wildly on the histogram

On Feb 9, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Leonard den Ottolander <leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 14:22 -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> There are two serious problems with this argument: >> >> 1. Give me a scenario where this attacker can execute *only* pkcheck > > On many systems local users cannot execute their own uploaded binaries >

I may have asked this before, but either I didn't, or I've inadvertently discarded the message containing the answer, so pardon please if this is a repeat. Wil EZStream ever support cue sheets--a companion file containing metadata information normally inserted into the stream from that contained in the multimedia file itself? More play-out software is including the ability to produce

Hi everybody. I have a dilema and I think you guys can help me out. I am trying to shape the bandwith for about 500 clients, and I want the bandwith to be alocated dynamicly. Lets say I have 4 MB bandwith. I give each ip (500 IP''s) a sustained rate of 4 KB/sec . I wonder if I can shape the bandwith so when for example only 100 clients are online, to give them a rate of 4MB/100. How can

I think I found the problem: https://opia.illinois.edu/content/targeted-attack-protection-tuning UIUC is apparently rewriting HTML links in emails to redirect through urldefense.proofpoint.com. This is visible in my version of Rui's email. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > I sent the mail from Gmail. I checked the source using the Gmail

>> As per my post: checkpassword. You can then use one password on Mondays, >> Wednesdays, and Fridays, alternate passwords on Tuesdays and Thursday >> fetched from a rot-13 database, and only from prime numbered IP addresses >> on weekends, if that's what you want. > > Having read the wiki page on checkpassword, I am unsure how this would > work with an ldap

I have clients, which connectin to Internet through vpn. I want to dynamically share bandwith between vpn connections, so if there few connections, then they get all bandwith, if more then they get their minimal guaranteed bandwith. my idea is: ip-up.local: tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2${1/ppp/} htb rate $[$RATEUP/$VPNS]kbit ceil ${RATEUP}kbps tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip

I have a existencial problem. There are some provider that offer the service of bandwith asimetric as download/upload link as for example 512/256. but most of them offer not exclusive this amount of transmission or reception capacity. They usually offer the service with more users as a ratio of 1/10. How I can design a appropriate diagrama with htb where the amount of bandwith could vary.?

Dear members, I am trying to share the bandwith for all users fairly. because some users heavily uses p2p programs and a few hosts consume most of bandwith. when we limit each flow it does not work as one client has many connection at same time. Firstly I tried to write a script that use the ipfm(which accounts traffic usage) logs as follow .extract ip addresses heavy bandwith users from