similar to: [LLVMdev] Troubles with clang and llvm libraries and simple Xcode project

Jun-qi Deng <dengjunqi06323011 at gmail.com> writes: > I got your point. Thank you, and I'd like to provide the relative message > now. But firstly, what do you mean by the "relevant command generated by > your makefile"? What I can tell you now is: > > The Error Message: > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/tang.kk/ppcg/ppcg/isl/interface' > CXXLD

I got your point. Thank you, and I'd like to provide the relative message now. But firstly, what do you mean by the "relevant command generated by your makefile"? What I can tell you now is: The Error Message: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/tang.kk/ppcg/ppcg/isl/interface' CXXLD extract_interface extract_interface.o:(.data.rel.ro._ZTI13MyASTConsumer[typeinfo for

I wrote a plugin using ASTConsumer and RecursiveASTVisitor to find "interesting" variables and functions. I'm wonder if there is a way to save/flag/metadata these so later on at the IR level I can use this information in a Pass. As far as I can tell nothing currently would allow me todo this and I'm wondering what exactly it would take to do something like this. After stairing

Hi, Isn't clang::CodeGenOptions::EmitDeclMetadata what you need? Vassil On 07/21/2011 04:32 AM, ret val wrote: > I wrote a plugin using ASTConsumer and RecursiveASTVisitor to find > "interesting" variables and functions. I'm wonder if there is a way to > save/flag/metadata these so later on at the IR level I can use this > information in a Pass. > > As far

>> 1. Many Objective-C(++) tests fail, because they use implicitly >> defined structs for various ObjC runtime data structures; the >> ASTConsumer HandleTagDeclDefinition callback is never called for these >> structs, which means that I don't bother to lay them out, so they only >> ever get an opaque LLVM type. Then we get assertion failures when >>

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> wrote: > I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them directly > in CGDebugInfo through PPCallbacks during preprocessing. > > To do that, I needed to extend ASTConsumer interface with this extra > method: > > > > /// If the consumer is interested in notifications from

> 1. Clang - Jay, do you have a patch for this? Yes. It's good enough to build most of LLVM+Clang, except for a couple of files. But I'm running out of time and expertise to be able to fix the remaining bits. Some specific concerns: 1. Many Objective-C(++) tests fail, because they use implicitly defined structs for various ObjC runtime data structures; the ASTConsumer

Any ideas? Instruction uses an alias of an allocated register UNREACHABLE executed at RegAllocFast.cpp:358! 0 clang 0x0000000101309bc2 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 34 1 clang 0x000000010130a863 SignalHandler(int) + 707 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff8056935a _sigtramp + 26 3 libSystem.B.dylib 000000000000000000 _sigtramp + 2141809856 4 clang 0x00000001012dd96d

Hi! I've tried to write a plugin for clang using an example. class PrintInheritanceConsumer : public ASTConsumer { public: virtual void HandleTopLevelDecl(DeclGroupRef DG) { ......... } }; I need to save Metadata for Type or Module into IR, but I can't find a way to do this, can you help me? Thanks! Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: >> 1. Clang - Jay, do you have a patch for this? > > Yes. It's good enough to build most of LLVM+Clang, except for a couple > of files. But I'm running out of time and expertise to be able to fix > the remaining bits. Some specific concerns: > > 1. Many Objective-C(++) tests fail, because

> Right - I was wondering if CGDebugInfo already implemented PPCallbacks or was otherwise being notified of PPCallback related things, possibly through a layer or two of indirection. I checked the approach of skipping representing macros in AST, and communicate them directly from Parser to CGDebugInfo. However, I could not find a way to initialize this communication. The only interface

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:20 AM, Christian Dietrich via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> writes: > >> Depending on your needs, just using a global with the “section” >> attribute might also work for you: >> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#global-variables > > I was aware of that possibility. But,

Hello Guys, From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from: __ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o. In fact, I didn't have "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE" in the symbol table, only I have was

Hello Guys,From this morning, I have been always trying PrintFunctionNames - an example of clang, but during compiling I was always meeting "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE", referenced from:&nbsp;__ZTI24PrintFunctionNamesAction in PrintFunctionNames.cpp.o.In fact, I didn't have "__ZTIN5clang15PluginASTActionE" in the symbol table, only I have was

Hi I have a Radeon Ati 3d graphics external card in my machine. I have about 512 mb vram and 4 gb ram and intel core duo 2.4 ghz I have never experienced any problems with my graphics card untill i used it with wine on ubuntu. Suddenly I could not play the games I used to play in windows xp. I tested doom 95 and halo evolved and they both could not run and stuttered. I have no problems

LLVM Weekly - #1, Jan 6th 2014 ============================== Welcome to the inaugural issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. I've been a long time lurker on the LLVM and Clang mailing lists and have been using LLVM extensively in my PhD research for the past 4 years. I thought it might be worthwhile to

Jun-qi Deng <dengjunqi06323011 at gmail.com> writes: >> Is it? In my experience, it isn't. Please show the relevant command >> generated by your makefile and the associated error message(s). >> > >> RTTI is an on/off option that changes per LLVM library, so setting >> -fno-rtti for using LLVM makes no sense. VMCore and Support have -frtti >> while

> > Recently I think I found a bug in llvm's CMakeLists.(I use llvm 3.1svn > and > > Clang 3.1) I follow the normal way to try to compile an application that > > utilize both clang and llvm: I ./autogen.sh it, ./configure it and make > it. > > But the make fails. At last I found out the failure is because that the > > Makefile's CXXFLAGS does not contain

An update on the type-system-rewrite branch (http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/type-system-rewrite/): It's now to the point where it passes all regression tests all of single source (and most of externals/multisource) when using an LLVM 2.9 version of clang to compile programs to a rbc file. I have what looks like one more subtle type mapping bug to track down, which will