similar to: [LLVMdev] How to get the total number of variables in a funciton?

Mingxing Tan wrote: > > Hi, all; > > How can I get the number of variables in a function/module (both the > number of variables in original source program and the number of > temporal variables for ssa-form)? > Do you want the SSA values *created* by a function, those used by a function, or both? For SSA values, simply iterate over all of the instructions within the

Hello, What would be the best set of R functions to parse and transform a file? My file looks as shown below. I would like to plot this data and I need to parse it into a single data frame that sorts of "transposes the data" with the following structure: > df <- data.frame(n=c(1,1,2,2),iter=c(1,2,1,2),step=as.factor(c('Step 1', 'Step2', 'Step 1',

Dear all, Is there a good way of doing the following conversion: [YYYY]-[MM]-[DD] [Time] [Day] [Name][Integer].[Extention] to become C:\test\[Name]\[YYYY]-[MM]-[DD] [Time] [Day]\[YYYY]-[MM]-[DD] [Time] [Day] [Name][Integer].[Extention] i.e. these 2009-04-10 1400 Fri Foo1.txt 2009-04-10 1400 Fri Universities2.txt 2009-04-10 1400 Fri Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy42.txt will become

Help-Rs,   I'm doing some string manipulation in a file where I converted a string date in mm/dd/yyyy format and returned the date yyyy.   I've used regexpr (hat tip to Gabor G for a very nice earlier post on this function) in steps (I've un-nested the code and provided it and an example of what I did below.  My question is: is there a more efficient way to do this.  Specifically is

I large datset that includes subjects(ID), Dates and events that need to be counted.  Not every date includes an event, and I need to only count one event per 30days, per subject.  So in essence, I need to create a 30-day "black out" period during which time an event cannot be "counted" for each subject.  The reason is that a rule has been set up, whereby a subject can only be

Just for fun, I tried to reproduce such an overflow. I turned on all debug macros, assertions, and checked arithmetic and then encoded 2 hours of mixed speech/audio with these parameters: Sample rate = 48000 Channels = 1 Application = OPUS_APPLICATION_AUDIO Bitrate = 24 KB/s Force Mode = MODE_SILK_ONLY Signal Type = OPUS_SIGNAL_AUTO Complexity = 10 Frame size = 480 samples (10ms) No errors came

Hi! Thanks for providing great help in R-related statistics. Now, however I'm stuck. I'm not a statistics person but I was recommended to use R to perform a nmds plot and PerMANOVA of my dataset. Sample(treatment) in the columns and species (OTU) in the rows. I have 4 treatments (Ambient Temperature, Ambient temperature+Low pH, High temperature, High temperature+low pH), and I have 16

Hi, Can anyone let me know if this is a bug? Thank you, Chandrakala ----- Original Message ----- From: "Logan Stromberg" <loganstromberg at gmail.com> To: "Chandrakala Madhira" <chandrakala.madhira at soctronics.com> Cc: opus at xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 12:12:39 PM Subject: Re: [opus] Reg an issue with smoothing factor in VAD

Hi all I''m new to rails an i''m trying to build a step by step form / process to gather data. For example: form one: User enters a 8 digit number the submit button points to form 2. form two: the 8 digit number from form one becomes a hidden field in form 2. The problem I have is that the entire hash from form 1 is showing up in form two rather than just the input data.

Hello, I have a rather complex problem... I will have to explain everything in detail because I cannot solve it by myself...i just ran out of ideas. So here is what I want to do: I take quotes of two indices - S&P500 and DJ. And my first aim is to estimate coefficients of the DCC-GARCH model for them. This is how I do it: library(tseries) p1 = get.hist.quote(instrument =

i have a 2 step form which contains 1 file_column field. The second form is just "This is how your post will look" kind of form and the user can click Edit (to take them back to form1) or Submit. If the user clicks edit it takes them back to the first form with fields populated. I have it working with all text fields, I just dont know how to do this with file_column field (showing the

Dear users, I'm working on binary classification problem using Support Vector Machines (SVM). My objective is to train a series of SVM models on a grid of hyperparameters and then select those that maximize the AUC based on an independent validation sample. My attempted code is shown below. It runs well on "small" data sets but when I use it on a slightly larger sample (e.g., my

If you're able to reproduce the infinite loop with -O3 then you should be able to dump out the IR that causes `opt -instcombine` to infloop, unless the bug is truly esoteric (e.g. only caused by a specific use-list ordering). Maybe take a closer look at the output from `opt -print-before-all -O3`? Alternatively you can use bugpoint to minimize the IR to get a small reproducer that causes

Hi Chandrakala, Logan, Can you confirm that the attached patch fixes the overflow problem? Koen, can you confirm the fix makes sense? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 11/27/2017 12:10 PM, Logan Stromberg wrote: > Sorry, long holiday weekend in America. > I can say with pretty high certainty that there is an overflow occurring > and it is flipping smooth_coef_Q16 to be negative when it probably

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michelle Strout wrote: > Those of us working on the OpenAnalysis project have been looking at > LLVM recently (excellent job on the website BTW). Thanks! I'm just one of the many people who have worked on it though, the praise belongs to them as much as it does to me. :) > This includes researchers at Rice, Argonne, and LLNL. Great! > John Mellor-Crummey

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michelle Strout wrote: > I think some clarifications and examples would be helpful. No problem. :) > - LLVM is in SSA. It is in SSA before alias analysis has been > >>>> performed. With OA, it has been mentioned that the SSA generation > >>>> is > >>>> incorrect because it doesn't take alias analysis information into

Happy new year :D i have just installed centos 5.5 on my vmware to test my server,i found that i need nasm x64 to compile my assembly code,the yum database only has 0.98 version which does not support 64bit. the nasm version 2(rpm from offcial site) requires glibc 2.7, i know its a core component, but is there a way to upgrade it without break system? thanks for your time :D NamoBhagavan Max

Hi Jim. I'm doing custom lowering but here I have a very basic issue and the situation is like this - [Original Op] Mul Dest, Src1, Src2 [Expanded from EmitInstrWithCustomInserter] Step1 Dest, Src1, Src2    <=== BuildMI(..., Step1, Dest).addReg(Src1).addReg(Src2) Step2 Dest, Src1, Src2    <=== BuildMI(..., Step2, Dest).addReg(Src1).addReg(Src2) Step3 Dest, Src2, Src1    <===

Hello. Thank you very much for the research paper. I will try to make use of the algorithms it presents. I just want to add that I found a 3rd party project doing dataflow analysis for LLVM IR at https://github.com/rohitjha/cse231-proj2. As written at http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~r1jha/#five , the project's description is: "Dataflow Analysis Framework for LLVM This is an

step 1 [Image: http://www.gimptr.com/gimptribay/step1.png ] step2 [Image: http://www.gimptr.com/gimptribay/step2.png ] What can i do?