similar to: [LLVMdev] how to make llvm-ld pass -m64 to as?

Hi all, I too am getting this error for x86_64 when I am trying to use the Data Structure Analysis ...I svn upped both the llvm main branch and the poolalloc today in the morning and recompiled everything from scratch : $ opt -load /home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm-install-x86-64/lib/libpoolalloc.so -ds-aa < o.bc opt: /home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1418: virtual void

Hi, I am trying to use the poolallocator. More specific, I am trying to play around with the pointer compression pass. Though, I get assertion failures for the pass dependencies. This is when it in PointerCompress::getAnalysisUsage tries to register the the BU pass as required. I.e. when AU.addRequired<CompleteBUDataStructures>(); is called. $ opt -f -load

Dear Prakash, Yes, DSA is still in active use, although nobody else uses the -ds-aa pass as far as I know. I tried the below sample (although ds-aa should be in libLLVMDataStructure.so and not libpoolalloc.so), and I get the same error. I've seen similar problems with other passes in our work here. My guess is that -ds-aa is requiring two passes that claim to invalidate each other; this

Dear Prakash, I believe I've fixed the problem you were having with ds-aa. Please update your poolalloc tree, recompile, and let me know if it works. -- John T. Criswell, John T wrote: > [snip] > > ________________________________________ > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Prakash Prabhu [prakash.prabhu at gmail.com] > Sent:

Hi, Does any interactive llvm interpreter exist or is there one being developed at the moment? What I am talking about is something like LLI but interactive so that it is possible to step through LLVM code statement by statement and inspect the results of various expressions. This would for example greatly simplify debugging of compiler passes. We are thinking of having a master's

Hi, Is there any standard pass or something that can fuse chained GEPIs? I.e. turning b = getelementptr a, 10, 1 c = getelementptr b, 0, 3 d = getelementptr c, 0, 5 into: d = getelementptr a, 10, 1, 3, 5 In our case this would greatly simplify some analysis passes, at the moment we have to trace back a gepi-chain and extract all the indices manually (the original object is available

On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Mattias Holm wrote: > Hi, > > Does any interactive llvm interpreter exist or is there one being > developed at the moment? What I am talking about is something like LLI > but interactive so that it is possible to step through LLVM code > statement by statement and inspect the results of various expressions. > This would for example greatly simplify

On Thursday 05 March 2009 17:50:31 Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Mattias Holm wrote: > > Does any interactive llvm interpreter exist or is there one being > > developed at the moment? What I am talking about is something like LLI > > but interactive so that it is possible to step through LLVM code > > statement by statement and inspect the results of

Another open question is who is responsible for inserting calls to the collector routine (or signaling a collector thread)? My impression is that this has to be done in the front-end for now since there is no support for doing this at the safe points at the moment. Is this correct? Regards, Mattias On 20 Mar 2009, at 13:09, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2009-03-20, at 05:09, Harmen

My application is 64bit running on Solaris 10 with Sparc. I'd like to use llvm-gcc/g++ to compile it to make it run faster. But in the Release Notes of the latest LLVM release, it says Known problems with the SPARC back-end * The SPARC backend only supports the 32-bit SPARC ABI (-m32); it does not support the 64-bit SPARC ABI (-m64). Why it doesn't support 64bit on sparc? Thanks!

My application is 64bit running on Solaris 10 with Sparc. I'd like to use llvm-gcc/g++ to compile it to make it run faster. But in the Release Notes of the latest LLVM release, it says Known problems with the SPARC back-end * The SPARC backend only supports the 32-bit SPARC ABI (-m32); it does not support the 64-bit SPARC ABI (-m64). Why it doesn't support 64bit on sparc? Thanks!

Hi all, I have a server with an Athlon 64 3200 and Fedora Core 2 x86_64. I have compiled and installed Asterisk 1.0.6 without any problems. When I try to make asterisk-addons-1.0.6 it say me: [root@server1 asterisk-addons-1.0.6]# make ./mkdep -fPIC -I../asterisk -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/mysql `ls *.c` make -C format_mp3 all make[1]: Entering directory

Hello, I'm enabling clang LTO to improve code size of Uefi standard (http://www.uefi.org/) firmware (https://github.com/tianocore/edk2), which is mostly C code. My project is in https://github.com/shijunjing/edk2 branch llvm : https://github.com/shijunjing/edk2/tree/llvm. I find my most firmware modules work well after enable LTO, but some X64 modules will not run (e.g. hang with CPU

You normally see these errors when compiling on a vm that has very little memory. Hadley On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Ben Tupper <btupper at bigelow.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using

I use ferret on a danish site where I would like ferret to search word like "under" and "and". These are words that are excluded by ferret but have a different meaning in danish. Can you dissable this in ferret? Cheers Mattias -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using utils::install.packages() and then again using devtools::install_github(). Each yields an error similar to the other but not quite exactly the same - the error messages sail right over my head. I

Dear all, Has anyone seen the same problem? I tried compiling R-1.9.0 alpha (2004-03-16) on our Opteron box running SUSE Linux ES8. I ran: ./configure --enable-R-shlib --with-blas=goto and got: Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C compiler: gcc -m64 -O2 -g -msse2 -march=k8 -Wall --pedantic C++ compiler: g++ -m64 -O2 -g

Dear List, Having had my appetite sufficiently whetted by Prof. Ripley's email about the new graphics capabilities in Unixes, I wanted to try them out. I updated to svn r44608, configured with the following options: R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Source directory: .. Installation directory: /usr/local C compiler: gcc -O3 -g -std=gnu99

Thanks I let GParted create the file system. It was done on a rescue disk of Ubuntu 12.04 (GParted 0.11.0) I think that the problem is in my command line. Mau On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Mattias Schlenker <ms at mattiasschlenker.de>wrote: > Am 24.03.2014 14:13, schrieb Mau Z: > > Hi All, >> >> I am trying to install extlinux on a fresh system. >>

We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines with the usual mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've managed to configure R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C compiler: gcc -m64 -g -O2 C++