similar to: [LLVMdev] Validation Update

> Right now the buildbot is set up to build every N commits (N=10 for testing > purposes) and also build every Sunday at midnight. The buildbot does not > automatically tag successful validations. That will take some more work and > we don't want that automation quite yet anyway. We'll do it manually for a > while and then once we get the gist of it we can make it

On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:19, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > Right now the buildbot is set up to build every N commits (N=10 for > > testing purposes) and also build every Sunday at midnight. The buildbot > > does not automatically tag successful validations. That will take some > > more work and we don't want that automation quite yet anyway. We'll do >

>>> Right now the buildbot is set up to build every N commits (N=10 for >>> testing purposes) and also build every Sunday at midnight. The buildbot >>> does not automatically tag successful validations. That will take some >>> more work and we don't want that automation quite yet anyway. We'll do >>> it manually for a while and then once we

YMMV, but I think when I tried this with buildbot 250 was the largest I could get per build, no matter how many I told it to keep. Sent from my iPad > On May 20, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Chris

If you create a slave name and password for me, i'm happy to put one of the ubuntu 8.04 8 core machines i have running it. They are x86_64-linux (you would need to add -j8, which can be done through properties easily) On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:46 AM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 28 January 2009 15:59, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:18

On Wednesday 28 January 2009 15:59, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:18 PM, David Greene wrote: > > I have a buildbot operating to do validating builds of llvm up at > > > > http://obbligato.org:8080 > > > > My DSL has been stable enough for the past few months for me to > > feel comfortable hosting the buildbot there. > > We had a

On Jan 28, 2009, at 8:25 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:46 PM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Wednesday 28 January 2009 15:59, Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:18 PM, David Greene wrote: >>>> I have a buildbot operating to do validating builds of llvm up at >>>> >>>> http://obbligato.org:8080 >>>>

Hi All, Recent conversations [1][2] would suggest we need to rethink zorg or at the very least improve the documentation. I've CC'ed Daniel Dunbar, Galina Kistanova and Duncan Sands because it seemed that they have contributed the most code to Zorg Organisation ========= The current organisation of the Zorg repository doesn't make a huge amount of sense from my perspective. There

On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:46 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 28 January 2009 15:59, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:18 PM, David Greene wrote: >>> I have a buildbot operating to do validating builds of llvm up at >>> >>> http://obbligato.org:8080 >>> >>> My DSL has been stable enough for the past few months for me to

Also, if you want to put the buildbot status with the other buildbots we have on google1.osuosl.org, i'm happy to add your config to the master On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > If you create a slave name and password for me, i'm happy to put one > of the ubuntu 8.04 8 core machines i have running it. They are > x86_64-linux

On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:18, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jan 28, 2009, at 8:25 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:46 PM, David Greene wrote: > >> On Wednesday 28 January 2009 15:59, Tanya Lattner wrote: > >>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:18 PM, David Greene wrote: > >>>> I have a buildbot operating to do validating builds of llvm up at

I have a buildbot operating to do validating builds of llvm up at http://obbligato.org:8080 My DSL has been stable enough for the past few months for me to feel comfortable hosting the buildbot there. It's not yet sending messages to llvmdev. I want to do some more testing of the setup before I turn it loose on everyone. But you can go take a look to see how it operates.

On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:18 PM, David Greene wrote: > I have a buildbot operating to do validating builds of llvm up at > > http://obbligato.org:8080 > > My DSL has been stable enough for the past few months for me to > feel comfortable hosting the buildbot there. > We had a discussion in the past on what validate means. Did you ever formalize that? It might be good if you

I''m hoping someone can help me (a Rails newbie) with this. Basically, I need to verify that a date created with "date_select" is valid *before* it''s sent off to the database for acceptance (as a valid date) or rejection (as an invalid date). Given how easy the majority of validation are in Rails, I''ve got to believe there''s a fairly simple way

So a lot of Rails apps (mine included) have multiple validations on a single attribute. For example: on the password field, validating that it is (a) not blank, (b) matches the confirmation, (c) is at least X characters long, and (d) contains at least 1 alpha and at least 1 numeric character. The problem is: if that field is blank, the default errors shows all four. That''s a little

Thanks to Daniel, we have a new home for the validator buildbot. Thanks, Daniel! Go to http://google1.osuosl.org:8080 and have a look. -Dave

On 2009-03-06 22:18, David Greene wrote: > Thanks to Daniel, we have a new home for the validator buildbot. Thanks, > Daniel! > > Go to http://google1.osuosl.org:8080 and have a look. > Looks like the x86_64 buildsbots are failing:

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 15:47, Török Edwin wrote: > > Go to http://google1.osuosl.org:8080 and have a look. > > Looks like the x86_64 buildsbots are failing: > > /.AUTO/cray/iss.compiler/cost/tools/llvm-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin >/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux- >gnu/bin/ld: >

On Monday 10 November 2008 15:28, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I see that you're doing a Debug build. Could you do a "Release" or > "Release-Asserts" build instead? This will catch errors which > developers won't normally see. I never knew about buildbot until just now. This could really help with the validation proposal I just posted. Can

On Thursday 16 July 2009 14:04, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > 2009/7/15 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: > > I'm not too keen about seeing buildbots play with trunk ;) > > > > How about starting simple, and just auto-tagging builds that work? > > Could be done per OS/arch, and one global tag when all buildbots pass. > > I don't know anything about svn