similar to: [LLVMdev] Why is "typedef boost::shared_ptr<MyClass> MyClass_ptr" named "struct.boost::MyClass_ptr" by llvm-g++?

Hello, I am having some trouble matching patterns in targetinstructioninfo.td file with the CodeGen expectation. Could anybody please help? Here is the example: I want to emit instruction for adding 2 different kind of oprands. Basically i want to mix register types when I define the instruction for add,sub etc I define the instruction TargetInstruction.td as follows: class MyInst <opcode

why llvm contains IntrusiveRefCntPtr instead of using only std::shared_ptr? IntrusiveRefCntPtr widely used in llvm and clang source code. Due to better performance? for example in main func of clang frontend: int cc1_main(ArrayRef<const char *> Argv, const char *Argv0, void *MainAddr) { ensureSufficientStack(); std::unique_ptr<CompilerInstance> Clang(new CompilerInstance());

I''m trying to consume a webservice from my rails application and have discovered an interesting problem. I can call webservice functions just fine, as long as they do not require any arguments, but function that do require arguments do not work. The arguments are sent as either null or an empty string. My API has these method definitions: api_method :otherFunction,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Kramer via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> In terms of performance shared_ptr has a number of

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Kramer via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > In terms of performance shared_ptr has a number of disadvantages. One > is that it always uses atomics even though most IntrusiveRefCntPtrs > are used in single-threaded contexts. Another is weak_ptr adding a lot > of complexity to the implementation, IntrusiveRefCntPtr

Hi all - I posted yesterday with the subject "namespace pollution" and with the high traffic on this list, it''s kind of disappeared and I''m in need of a quick answer so i can move on. To recap quickly, can someone tell if Rails is somehow forcing all modules into a single namespace? I have a model class StateProvince and inside a webservice module in my lib/

hi, when using the execution engine (no matter, if JIT or Interpreter) i get the following assertion as soon as i use boost::shared_ptr: /build/buildd/llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp:522: void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const llvm::MachineInstr&, const llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): Assertion `0 && "JIT does not support inline asm!\n"' failed.

Stefan Weigert wrote: > hi, > > when using the execution engine (no matter, if JIT or Interpreter) i get the > following assertion as soon as i use boost::shared_ptr: > > /build/buildd/llvm-2.5/lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp:522: > void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const llvm::MachineInstr&, const > llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): Assertion `0 &&

Hello, I have defined a new class > setClass("myclass", representation(min = "numeric", max = "numeric")) and want to write accessor functions, so that for > foo = new("myclass", min = 0, max = 1) > min(foo) # prints 0 > max(foo) # prints 1 At first i created a generic function for "min" > setGeneric("min",

hi, thanks for your quick replies. -DBOOST_SP_USE_PTHREADS worked indeed. however, i didn't measure the performance but i would assume that the boost developers had a good reason for using assembler in this context. will llvm ever support inline assembly? is there anybody who is working on that? thanks, stefan. On Tuesday 21 July 2009 01:54:20 pm Vladimir Prus wrote: > Stefan Weigert

I am writing a function to work with class I am defining. I have a question about using nargs() inside of parentheses function. nargs() shows the same for supplying 1 argument, or no arguments at all. Here is a small example: > "[.myclass"<-function(x,...) print(nargs()-1) > x<-c(1,2,3) > class(x)<-"myclass" > x[] [1] 1 > x[1] [1] 1 > x[1,2] [1] 2

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

Bugs item #6825, was opened at 2006-11-22 18:19 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=6825&group_id=35 Category: Incorrect behavior Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Kevin Smith (qualitycode) Summary: Missing typedef for Wx::FindReplaceData constructor Initial Comment:

The typedef of _BB was causing problems with Visual Studio, it looks like something else is #define'ing _BB so I get a compilation error. Since it seems nothing is using this typedef, I just removed it - here is the patch. m. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: diff.txt URL:

Hi all, If I have a C struct declaration like this: typedef struct typeA {...} typeB; In the type symbol table generated should it contain an entry for struct.typeA or struct.typeB? I seem to have seen both cases using the same llvm toolchain so I just wonder if I have done something wrong. Thanks, Alvin

Hi Alvin, > If I have a C struct declaration like this: > > typedef struct typeA {...} typeB; > > In the type symbol table generated should it contain an entry for struct.typeA > or struct.typeB? I seem to have seen both cases using the same llvm toolchain > so I just wonder if I have done something wrong. it doesn't matter what the name is since it has no effect on

Hi Duncan, Actually what I am doing is matching up each Type with its corresponding debug info. I have checked that the debug info generated is consistent (i.e., typeA is recorded as a derived type from composite type typeB in my example), but I have seen cases where the name recorded in the Type object is typeA and sometimes typeB, that's why I am confused. Alvin Duncan Sands wrote:

While solving a clang build issue with netpbm10 on fink darwin11, I noticed that clang seems to provide poor error messages compared to llvm-gcc. For llvm-gcc, we get the very helpful warning... libpbm3.c: In function 'packBitsWithMmxSse': libpbm3.c:120: warning: specifying vector types with __attribute__ ((mode)) is deprecated libpbm3.c:120: warning: use __attribute__ ((vector_size))

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:49:24PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:08:44PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For > > now, this is just documenting that the function returns > > a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances > > are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type.

Hi, > > So my expectation that a backmerge happens anyway after -rc1/2 is in > > line with reality, it is just to be delayed this time. I'll stay > > tuned ;) > > Is this patch already merged in drm-misc-next tree ? Pushed now. cheers, Gerd