similar to: [LLVMdev] print out instruction

Hi all, With the newest patches to LLVM, there should be no reason for having "#include <iostream>" in any library source code file, except for lib/ Support/Streams.cpp. Please use the following instead: OLD NEW --- --- std::ostream llvm::OStream std::istream llvm::IStream std::cerr llvm::cerr std::cerr llvm::cout

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Bill Wendling wrote: > With the newest patches to LLVM, there should be no reason for having > "#include <iostream>" in any library source code file, except for lib/ > Support/Streams.cpp. Please use the following instead: > > OLD NEW > --- --- > std::ostream llvm::OStream > std::istream

I need help. I can't get it to work. I'm crying here, really, I'm balling my eyes out. Is there any way for a beginner to get support with using LLVM? All my queries are just ignored or disregarded on this mailing list. Why isn't there an llvm mailing list for novices? This is the only thing that can get my programming language, to be operation in a reasonable amount of time,

Hi edA-qa mort-ora-y, On 01/11/12 09:03, edA-qa mort-ora-y wrote: > I'm using createPrintModulePass to produce the IR of a created Module. > I'm wondering if there is some way to insert/attach comments to the > generated output. That is, prior to a given command, or block, emit a > comment. > > I see the ability to add meta/debug data. Could that somehow be used to >

On Monday 13 August 2007 15:50, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I also have a few questions on the general design of AsmPrinter. Why is > > runOnMachineFunction implemented for each target AsmPrinter? I would > > Historical reasons that aren't very good. Over the years, I've taken > several stabs at merging the asmprinters from various targets together. > They used to

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> gcc version 3.4.5 (mingw special) > > Can you try 4.0 or 4.1 just to be sure? mingw (native gcc for win32) doesn't officially support using gcc 4.0 and 4.1 yet (apparantly there have been some issues), so there are no binary packages. But if you think it helps, I can compile gcc 4.1 and give it a shot. >> Compile flags: >> DEFINES +=

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, David Greene wrote: >> Yes, this is one advantage, another is that we wouldn't have to fix the >> same bug in multiple places :) > > Right. I've figured out where I need to make the changes in AsmWriterEmitter > given the current design. Ok, cool. > I'm trying out a few interesting things here based on custom streambufs. > It requires

Hi Team, We need freeradius-server-3.0.21 to be cross compiled for armv7 based Marvell switch. Toolchain: armv7-marvell-linux-gnueabi-LE_i686_20160226 host : arm-none-linux-gnueabi CC : arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi-gcc For that talloc is dependent library. Trying to cross compile talloc-2.3.1 to for our architecture with below command. ./configure --disable-python --enable-gccdeps

It seems that support for dumping text representation of LLVM objects to standard channels and C++ output streams was removed. My guess is that now we must use errs() instead of std::cerr, llvm::raw_fd_ostream instead of std::ofstream, etc. The changes are not trivial, as for instance llvm::raw_fd_ostream without flags fails if the file exists, but std::ofstream does not. The changes include

Hello, I have a couple of doubts, as listed below: 1. To list all the global variables in the module, I am iterating using type_iterator and for each Type I get, I am using value_iterator to iterate over Values . In the second iteration I am getting unexpected results. For each type obtained from type_iterator->second, value_iterator->first produces the same list as what

On 3/22/2018 6:29 PM, Alexandre Isoard via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way to dump the Module IR with the SCEV as comment at the > end of each line? AssemblyAnnotationWriter exists, but I don't think anyone has hooked it up to SCEV, specifically. -Eli -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,

Here is the bulk of the sanitizing. My residual doubts center around the question whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code in 2.0/2.1. I need a definitive word on this to proceed. My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached

Has anyone tried to build llvm on Sun T1 machine with ubuntu? I got a bunch of error when building it. It seems that the configuration doesn't work well. I am getting error as: .../llvm/llvm-2.3/include/llvm/ADT/iterator:55:4: error: #error "Need to have standard iterator to define bidirectional iterator!" make[1]: *** [.../llvm/llvm-2.3/lib/System/Release/Signals.o] Error 1

On 01/11/12 09:16, Duncan Sands wrote: > check out AssemblyAnnotationWriter.h I've got some static data being output, but now I'm unsure on how I should structure the actual strings I wish to write. For example, on the emitFunctionAnnot I get a Function object, but I don't see any API which we set/get user or meta data for a function. (Note, obviously I can just do my own mapping

Hi Hal, On 10/17/12 9:43 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: >> I am currently working on a full re-implementation of the WFV >> algorithm >> on top of the latest trunk. >> One part of it that is basically finished is an analysis pass that I >> call "vectorization analysis", which annotates a function (WFV works >> on >> entire functions) with metadata used

Tobi, it looks like this code is the problem: for (std::vector<Value *>::iterator PI = Pointers.begin(), PE = Pointers.end(); ;) { Value *V = *PI; if (V->getName().size() == 0) OS << "\"" << *V << "\""; else OS << "\"" << V->getName() <<

At 2013-07-14 13:20:42,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/13/2013 09:18 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> >> >> At 2013-07-14 02:30:07,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> On 07/13/2013 10:13 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>>> Hi Tobias, >>> >>> Hi Star, >[...] >>> Before we write a

Hi folks, just installed the new llvm 1.9 build and noticed that my code no longer worked. It seems something has changed with addPassesToEmitFile(). First, the arguments to that method changed so that it no longer takes a PassManager, but only a FunctionPassManager. Instead there is a addPassesToEmitWholeFile() method, but that is marked as optional, and when I change my code to

21 jun 2014 the version numbers changed (samba-4.1.8), but the problem remains exactly the same: waf configure continues to break at krb5. frank smith 31 may 2014 greetings, in the (relatively distant) past, i several times downloaded, built, and ran the then-current version of samba with little to no problem. i recently experienced similar successful results with samba-3.6.23. i

Dear R users: I have a problem about catch the value from function. I have following two functions (part): fbolus1 <- function() {......... par<-data.frame(Parameter=c("kel","Vd"),Initial=c(0)) check(par) .....} check<-function(par) { if (par[ ,2] <= 0){ cat("\nEnter again (y/n) ?\n\n") ans<-readline() if (ans == "n" ){