similar to: [LLVMdev] CBE errors

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] CBE errors"

2008 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] CBE errors
Hello, Jeffrey > Here are the relevant lines from main.cbe.c. Notice that > "pthread_cancel" is declared as a weak external symbol, but > "_ZL22__gthrw_pthread_cancelm" is never declared (even though it is > used). This is bug in CBE. Please fill problem report in LLVM bugzilla. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics &
2008 Nov 11
1
[LLVMdev] CBE errors
On Nov 8, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> Here are the relevant lines from main.cbe.c. Notice that >> "pthread_cancel" is declared as a weak external symbol, but >> "_ZL22__gthrw_pthread_cancelm" is never declared (even though it is >> used). > This is bug in CBE. Please fill problem report in LLVM bugzilla. I submitted a request for
2008 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] bugpoint / cbe Problems
I'm having some trouble using bugpoint with newer version of gcc (bugpoint debug output below). I looked into the "conflicting type for malloc" problem and it doesn't seem easy to solve due to the unknown size of size_t (see LowerAllocations.cpp). The "void main()" problem is probably a result of this test being converted from Fortran. I'll have to dig into
2008 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] bugpoint / cbe Problems
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 10:31, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 16 July 2008 10:12, David Greene wrote: > > I'm having some trouble using bugpoint with newer version of gcc > > (bugpoint debug output below). > > I was using gcc 4.1.2. When I try 3.2.3 I get: > > bugpoint-test-program.bc.cbe.c:237: warning: conflicting types for built-in > function
2011 Aug 19
1
[LLVMdev] Break operands into multiple instructions
Hi All, I am creating an instrumentation pass using LLVM libraries. I am using clang++ (version 2.9) to compile cpp code into LLVM bit code. When I generate the llvm bit code using clang++ using -O3, I get many instances of instructions that look like the following. br i1 icmp ne (i8* bitcast (i32 (i32)* @pthread_cancel to i8*), i8* null), label %bb23, label %bb25 Here three LLVM instructions
2008 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] bugpoint / cbe Problems
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 10:12, David Greene wrote: > I'm having some trouble using bugpoint with newer version of gcc (bugpoint > debug output below). I was using gcc 4.1.2. When I try 3.2.3 I get: bugpoint-test-program.bc.cbe.c:237: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `memcpy' bugpoint-test-program.bc.cbe.c: In function `main':
2004 Aug 06
2
pthread_cancel error
Hello, I get the following error when I kill icecast. I am running icecast2 from source on a debian unstable box. I have looked around google and tried a couple of suggestions like moving and linking the libgcc library around, without any luck. "libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work?" Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Alex Martin shorewall@rettc.com
2012 Oct 10
1
[LLVMdev] CBE progress and design
Hello all, As some of you may remember, I am trying to get the C back-end back in working condition. I have the old version up and running (including most of it's pre-existing bugs), email me if you want a patch to the current trunk. === Question 1: new design feedback === I am currently looking into moving the CBE to run after the initial lowering and type legalization phases so that
2005 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] -Wl,native-cbe problem
I will definately look into this tonight and see if it is a problem with my recent patch. On Wednesday 02 March 2005 3:39 am, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Reid Spencer wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 22:07, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > >>Follow up: After removing the dangling symlink the problem now looks: > >> > >>-march=c((anonymous
2012 Oct 11
1
[LLVMdev] CBE progress and design
On 10/10/12 18:57, Nadav Rotem wrote: > Hi Roel! > > > On Oct 10, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Roel Jordans <r.jordans at tue.nl> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> As some of you may remember, I am trying to get the C back-end back in working condition. I have the old version up and running (including most of it's pre-existing bugs), email me if you want a patch to the
2005 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] -Wl,native-cbe problem
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 22:07, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Follow up: After removing the dangling symlink the problem now looks: > > -march=c((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x1e)[0x847a17e] > -fno-strict-aliasing: example.out.cbe.c: No such file or directory > gccld: example.out.cbe.c: Can't destroy file: > make: *** [example.out] Error 1 > At a minimum that
2012 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] How to enable cbe as a supported target?
The C Backend was remove in 3.1 (http://llvm.org/releases/3.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html): "Major Changes and Removed Features ... The C backend has been removed. It had numerous problems, to the point of not being able to compile any nontrivial program." On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Mingliang LIU <liuml07 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I met an error when I run the
2012 Dec 06
2
[LLVMdev] How to enable cbe as a supported target?
Hi Arnold, Thank you. I googled but missed the release notes. Regards. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer < arnold.schwaighofer at gmail.com> wrote: > The C Backend was remove in 3.1 > (http://llvm.org/releases/3.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html): > > "Major Changes and Removed Features > ... > The C backend has been removed. It had numerous problems,
2012 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] How to enable cbe as a supported target?
Hi all, I met an error when I run the llc command to transform a bitcode file to C code (source to source): $ llc -march=c -o foo.c foo.ll However, it said "*llc: error: invalid target 'c'.*" I checked the 'llc --version' only to find that there is no *c* as target. The *cpp* was there, which makes calls against the LLVM C++ API. But that's not what I want. I
2008 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] bugpoint / cbe Problems
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:00 AM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > What's the proper incantation to get bugpoint to run things through opt > but use llc to generate asm? As noted, CBE has issues generating > correct code so using it isn't an option right now. It should be something like bugpoint x.bc -llc-safe -pass1 -pass2 -pass3. The -llc-safe forces it to never
2008 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] bugpoint / cbe Problems
Hello, David. > After hacking around in the CBE output I managed to compile it with > gcc, only to discover that gcc 4.1.2 has the SAME bug LLVM does with > respect to alignment. Automatic stack realignment was atted to X86 backend ~3 months ago. Everything should work with LLVM. If not - please fill out a PR. AFAIR, automatic stack realignment still does not land into gcc mainline
2005 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] -Wl,native-cbe problem
Adam, Looks like you have your first issue with the gccld patch. Could you please look into this for us? Markus seems to have detected a situation where -native-cbe is acting like -native ... On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 00:39, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Short update: -native-cbe is currently broken as gccld/llc seems to generate > assembler code instead of C. To easy debugging of such
2008 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] bugpoint / cbe Problems
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 13:28, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, David. > > > After hacking around in the CBE output I managed to compile it with > > gcc, only to discover that gcc 4.1.2 has the SAME bug LLVM does with > > respect to alignment. > > Automatic stack realignment was atted to X86 backend ~3 months ago. > Everything should work with LLVM. If not -
2014 Mar 01
1
running postlogin script result in libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
Hey, I try to run a postlogin script with: service pop3 { executable = pop3 postlogin } service postlogin { executable = script-login /etc/dovecot/popafter.sh user = $default_internal_user unix_listener postlogin { } } In my popafter.sh I call a php script, and that result in: dovecot: postlogin: Error: libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work dovecot:
2012 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] How to enable cbe as a supported target?
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:05:03AM +0800, Mingliang LIU wrote: > Hi Arnold, > > Thank you. I googled but missed the release notes. > > Regards. Someone else out there tried to bring cbe back. You can search the ML archieve and reach them out. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)