similar to: [LLVMdev] Binutils bug caused LLVM to be miscompiled on Fedora 9

On 13.02.2016 10:01, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >>> Yes, it is a bug in ld. I have been working with H.J. and we have just tracked it down. >>> >> >> >> It seems that hjl helped, after all. >> >> Syslinux built, or better to write, linked with: >> binutils 2.26.51.20160212 git 95c00d1 is salt-n-pepa. >> >> Both, ISOLINUX and

Hello! I have encountered a problem when building shared klibc with recent binutils versions - apparently the breakage happened since binutils 2.17.50.0.2 due to the following change: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00279.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00466.html --- a/binutils/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c +++ b/binutils/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c @@ -3630,7 +3630,8 @@ static

> > Considering that a Mass Rebuild was already performed for F24, then an > > updated, patched binutils would probably generate new, working > > Syslinux-related packages. Otherwise, these packages for/in F24 will be > > probably failing. > > > > Binutils: > "Enable -Bsymbolic and -Bsymbolic-functions to PIE" >

On 14.02.2016 18:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >>> Considering that a Mass Rebuild was already performed for F24, then an >>> updated, patched binutils would probably generate new, working >>> Syslinux-related packages. Otherwise, these packages for/in F24 will be >>> probably failing. >>> >> >> Binutils: >> "Enable

fwd'ing to klibc malinglist. ----- Forwarded message from Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> ----- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:34:51 +0100 From: Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Subject: Bug#618616: arm build failure with latest binutils - usr/klibc/syscalls/_exit.S:29: Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a

Hi Fi $ rpm --query --file /usr/bin/objcopy binutils-2.25.1-9.fc24.x86_64 $ cd syslinux-7cd1ed6/ $ make bios ... make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/syslinux-7cd1ed6/bios/gpxe' make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/syslinux-7cd1ed6/bios' make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/syslinux-7cd1ed6' $ file bios/core/*.bin bios/core/isolinux.bin: data bios/core/isolinux-debug.bin:

> > Yes, it is a bug in ld. I have been working with H.J. and we have just tracked it down. > > > > > It seems that hjl helped, after all. > > Syslinux built, or better to write, linked with: > binutils 2.26.51.20160212 git 95c00d1 is salt-n-pepa. > > Both, ISOLINUX and EXTLINUX have passed the test on both, SeaBIOS and Bare-metal. > > Thanks hpa.

>> With GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.29.51.20171006) 1.14 have an assert: >> ~/LLVM/Release/bin/clang++ test.cpp -ffunction-sections -o test.o >> /usr/local/bin/ld: internal error in layout_eh_frame_section, at >> .././../gold/object.cc:1309 >> It is that place: >> https://github.com/gittup/binutils/blob/gittup/gold/object.cc#L1372 >> Did not investigate it,

>>> With GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.29.51.20171006) 1.14 have an assert: >>> ~/LLVM/Release/bin/clang++ test.cpp -ffunction-sections -o test.o >>> /usr/local/bin/ld: internal error in layout_eh_frame_section, at >>> .././../gold/object.cc:1309 >>> It is that place: >>> https://github.com/gittup/binutils/blob/gittup/gold/object.cc#L1372

On 30.01.2016 16:59, poma wrote: > ... > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 > > Mister Anvin, care to share what's the status of the "ld?" problemo, is anyone working on it? It would be maravilloso if syslinux can continue to build and test with latest and greatest.

Sri and I have been working on this over the past few months, and we've made some good progress that we'd like to share and get feedback on. Our work is based on the 'experimental-relr' prototype from Cary that is available at 'users/ccoutant/experimental-relr' branch in the binutils repository [1], and was described earlier in this thread:

On February 3, 2016 7:17:37 AM PST, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >2016-02-02 18:50 UTC+01:00, poma via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com>: >> On 30.01.2016 16:59, poma wrote: >>> ... >>> >>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 >>> >>> >> >> Mister Anvin, >> care to share what's the

I was having problems with very slow linking. Searching a little I found this bug report: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 The patch proposed in the report solved the problem for me. Maybe it is useful to others. Best Regards, Rafael

... https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538

2016-02-02 18:50 UTC+01:00, poma via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com>: > On 30.01.2016 16:59, poma wrote: >> ... >> >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 >> >> > > Mister Anvin, > care to share what's the status of the "ld?" problemo, > is anyone working on it? > > It would be maravilloso if syslinux can

On 02/03/16 10:30, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > On February 3, 2016 7:17:37 AM PST, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> 2016-02-02 18:50 UTC+01:00, poma via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com>: >>> On 30.01.2016 16:59, poma wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 >>>>

On 08.02.2016 19:04, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/03/16 10:30, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: >> On February 3, 2016 7:17:37 AM PST, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2016-02-02 18:50 UTC+01:00, poma via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com>: >>>> On 30.01.2016 16:59, poma wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>

Hello > /tmp/cczBL31y.s:409: rdhi, rdlo and rm must all be different This is binutils bug fixed ~2 years ago: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00046.html Make sure you're using the latest binutils for ARM (from binutils CVS) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Jordan Rupprecht via llvm-dev wrote: > > Where was this policy, which sounds like replicating their design > mistakes bug-for-bug, agreed upon and documented? > James responded already, but just to add my perspective: on the subject of > llvm vs gnu binutils compatibility, I've heard everything in the range from > "let's do

I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld. Cheers, Rafael ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On March 20, 2018 6:59 AM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program > property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time