similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.4 Release Notes

Thanks, I must have missed these, added. On Apr 22, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >> Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take >> a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit >> improvements if you have commit access): > > About the API changes, some that hit

The PIC16 is an 8-bit target but under the "LLVM IR and Core Improvements"heading it's called a 16-bit target. --John > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:14:21 -0700 > Subject: [LLVMdev] 2.6 release notes > Hi

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take > a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit > improvements if you have commit access): About the API changes, some that hit me when I ported some code to LLVM 2.7, and not in the release notes (I had sent a private email some time ago) : ---

What is the reason for the splitting of add and others into integer and floating point versions? Consistency with the div and remainder operations? I think the reason should be made clear in the release notes. Cheers, David 2009/10/11 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > Hi All, > > I'm done with the first pass over the 2.6 release notes, see them here: >

Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit improvements if you have commit access): http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Things still needed are marked with FIXMEs. These include: 1. Clang needs a blurb describing what's new in 2.7. Have the clang folks been doing anything for the last 6 months? 2. I

On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote: > Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. > > A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words

Hi All, I'm done with the first pass over the 2.6 release notes, see them here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes-2.6.html Please feel free to directly edit the file or send improvements. We aim to release 2.6 tomorrow or early next week. -Chris

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> There is no reason to include the CMake build system on this >> release. It >> is undocumented and immature. >> >> Please remove the cmake/ directory and all files named CMakeLists.txt >> from the LLVM source tree.

2011/10/28 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > > On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Michael Price wrote: > > Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I > could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for > interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of > commits would help this in the future. >

Has there been much thought of attempting to automate this process? I could imagine a fairly standard script that scrubbed a history for interesting tidbits. Of course a standard methodology for labeling types of commits would help this in the future. A very simple script could at least do unique word counts and throw out words that match a dictionary (like parts of speech, contributer names,

Please review and comment about: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html If we forgot anything or if there are edits, please commit them or let me know. Thanks! -Chris

On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Joe Abbey wrote: > I've done a first pass over the past 6 months of changes and some notable things stood out: > > * The ARM backend has reworked Set Jump Long Jump EH Lowering. > * The ARM backend includes improved support for Cortex-M > * The ARM backend adds parsing and encoding ARM/Thumb/Thumb2 assembly > > There are also many many

On Oct 10, 2008, at 8:09 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > wrote: >>> That is because the lib/CodeGen project file is missing PBQP.cpp. >> >> Can someone on windows please submit a patch? > > That was not the only missing file (there were three missing). I can > send you my project file if

On Oct 11, 2009, at 3:15 PM, John Myers wrote: > The PIC16 is an 8-bit target but under the "LLVM IR and Core > Improvements" heading it's called a 16-bit target. I think it uses 16-bit pointers though, right? I clarified in r83815. Thanks! -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Chris, Here's my review notes: 1. In the Known problems section you identify PR656 as a known problem. However, this bug is resolved and in January you reported that you verified it on Solaris. So, one of two things needs to happen. Either remove this item from the release notes, or re-open the bug and tell me what still breaks. 2. It seems that several items from the original DRAFT email

On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> writes: > > Tanya, > > There is no reason to include the CMake build system on this > release. It > is undocumented and immature. > > Please remove the cmake/ directory and all files named CMakeLists.txt > from the LLVM source tree. If there is no harm of

On Nov 28, 2011, at 7:20 AM, Joe Abbey wrote: > Internal API changes mentioned the Type system changes twice... merging. It should now read: > > The biggest and most pervasive change is that the type system has been rewritten: PATypeHolder and OpaqueType are gone, and all APIs deal with Type* instead of const Type*. If you need to create recursive structures, then create a named

Hi All, I am done with my first pass over the release notes, you can see them in mainline here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html In addition to the inevitable typos and other things that need to be cleaned up, there are several todo's for specific people: 1. All: please let me know if there is something missing that I forgot. 2. Daniel, please update the clang section [DANIEL]. 3.

The release notes mention numerous bug-fixes in the 2.4 release. Can you include a link to the Bugzilla query that returns these?

I'm UNhappy to see the iPhone SDK REQUIRES an expensive iMac computer to be able freely to develop programs on iPhone/iPod Touch. On 08/03/2008 00:59:55, Chris Lattner (clattner at apple.com) wrote: > I'm happy to announce that the iPhone SDK beta (released yesterday, > available on http://developer.apple.com) includes a beta version of > llvm-gcc 4.2 as part of the included