similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2 CC1_SPECS

Hi there, I am trying to install from the source R-2.4.0 on my mac (osx 10.4.8 G5 DP) The error imply Tcl/Tk. I install it by all the way I know: darwinport, the Tcl/Tk package from the dmg available from CRAN but without success. The PATH is correct. tclConfig.sh is localised in /opt/local/lib and have those permission: -rw-r--r-- 2 root admin 7K Oct 9 09:49 tclConfig.sh Here is

Anton, Can you post you results from contrib/test_summary for a make check-fortran of llvm 2.4's gcc 4.2 compilers on linux? I'll remove the offending flags from CC1_SPECS in darwin.h on llvm 2.4 and post the same results for i686-apple-darwin9. Are there any major issues left with the functionality of gfortran under llvm? Jack

Dear llvm/clang community, I'm interested in adding a way to emit source code interleaved in the output of the assembler. - Introduction A feature that several compilers have and clang/llvm is missing is the possibility of interleaving source code in the assembler output (e.g. when using -S). This feature is useful for a number of reasons. For those users who are concerned with the quality

On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:58 PM, David Greene wrote: >>> Ok, here's an example: >>> >>> movl (%rsi), %ecx # LLVM >>> Instruction: volatile store i32* %ksize, i32** >>> %ksize3 ; >>> [oox.4 : sln.5] >>> >>> #

Hi Alexandra, > I upgraded to llvm 2.8 and when I generate *.ll files from C/C++ with > clang -S -emit-llvm I obtain a *.ll file in which instructions and > basicblocks have no names. > I tried as well compiling with the -g option, but no names were given. with dragonegg using -fverbose-asm causes names to be generated in the IR. Maybe clang could do this to? Ciao, Duncan.

On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Alexandra, > >> I upgraded to llvm 2.8 and when I generate *.ll files from C/C++ with >> clang -S -emit-llvm I obtain a *.ll file in which instructions and >> basicblocks have no names. >> I tried as well compiling with the -g option, but no names were given. > > with dragonegg using -fverbose-asm causes

Hi LLVM Friends, Fans, Followers and Fanatics, LLVM 2.7 is live! You can download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ and read about it here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/ReleaseNotes.html This release includes approximately 6 months of development that provide major enhancements and new features over the LLVM 2.6 release. This includes significantly better generated code, improvements to

On 13/07/16 23:26, Markus Mayer wrote: > On 13 July 2016 at 10:19, Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg at osg.samsung.com> wrote: >> On 11/07/16 23:46, Markus Mayer wrote: >> >> Hi Markus, >> >> Amazing. I see this happening as well, but I know it shouldn't. >> >> The reason the #ifndef guards in headers are there is precisely to allow >>

There is no generic mechanism as far as I know. You can look at AsmPrinter.cpp/emitComments() to see what situations trigger comments at the moment. - Matthias > On Feb 3, 2018, at 4:40 AM, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > When I am constructing sequences of instructions during custom lowering, I would like to be able to also add a

Hi Trevor, DWARF exception handling is an amalgam of several different documents and code tables, which all conspire to give us exception handling. :-) The documents you should read are: * Exception Handling Tables (http://www.codesourcery.com/public/cxx-abi/exceptions.pdf) This explains in detail what the table in the "__TEXT,__gcc_except_tab" section is all about. * DWARF

When I am constructing sequences of instructions during custom lowering, I would like to be able to also add a comment that appears in the generated assembly with '-S -fverbose-asm'. There is a large set of 'add*' functions to attach additional information to the MI, but I don't see one for adding comments. Is there a method I can call to attach an arbitrary string

On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 13 July 2009 13:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > >>> We're not going to submit our line number stuff anyway (it's too >>> much of a >>> hack) but we would like the comment infrastructure to be there. >> >> DebugLoc is there. The transition isn't complete at the LLVM IR >> level,

On Monday 13 July 2009 15:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > Well sure, but how is that relevant? Just generate llvm.stoppoint and > isel turns them into debug locs. Just because debugloc isn't on > llvm::Instruction doesn't mean you don't get line numbers :). You're right, it's not a big hurdle. > > Ok, here's an example: > > > > movl

We'll be doing something similar for our OpenVMS port.  Right now I'm using "AsmStreamer->GetCommentOS()" and writing to the stream at the assembler level but that gets aligned on a right-side column (the column is hardcoded) and you have to be in verbose mode.  So if you come up with something or have a quick design, post it so perhaps we can leverage each other's work. 

On 13 July 2016 at 10:19, Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg at osg.samsung.com> wrote: > On 11/07/16 23:46, Markus Mayer wrote: > > Hi Markus, > > Amazing. I see this happening as well, but I know it shouldn't. > > The reason the #ifndef guards in headers are there is precisely to allow > circular dependencies. > > The problem in your output reads as: >

Anton, I didn't have to time to do fresh set of benchmarks for llvm-gfortran from 2.4 and current gcc trunk. I'll do that this weekend. However I suspect I'll see similar behavior as before. Compared to FSF gcc 4.2, llvm-gfortran will show improvements but it won't be as impressive compared to gcc trunk. Is there a projected date for supporting the vectorization in llvm for the

Dear List, I have acquired a new desktop and wanted to put a free OS on it. I am trying Fedora Core 1, but not sure what the best Linux OS is for using R 2.0.1? Thank you in advance for your input, Tom Volscho ************************************ Thomas W. Volscho Graduate Student Dept. of Sociology U-2068 University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 Phone: (860) 486-3882

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2009, at 4:07 PMPST, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> There is a problem with Objective-C code where a null string is placed >> in the wrong section. If we have this code: >> >> #include <Foundation/Foundation.h> >> void foo() { >> NSLog(@"");

The symbols I'm interested in already have internal linkage (as you would expect). But because the mangler is in charge of assigning them names, they never seem to be decorated with the 'L' in front. . . . -bw On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can symbols with external linkage but no name be converted > to have internal linkage?

Can symbols with external linkage but no name be converted to have internal linkage? Would that solve the problem? Dan On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > > Right now the Mangler::getValueName() method will produce something > like "__unnamed_1_37" for a global value that doesn't have a name. > This is wrong for Objective-C where CFStrings