Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] trouble generating profile_rt.so"
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
> To test clang:
> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source.
LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile'
llvm[2]: Compiling BasicBlockTracing.c for Release build (PIC)
llvm[2]: Compiling BlockProfiling.c for Release build (PIC)
llvm[2]:
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>:
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>
>>> To test clang:
>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source.
>>
>> LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get:
>>
>
> Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug.
No. Theres the runtime install bug (below), and llvm-gcc has a bug
that I
2009 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>> To test clang:
>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source.
>
> LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get:
>
Does TOT build? If not, please file a bug.
Unfortunately Cygwin is not in our release criteria. I'd like to have
a buildbot running (if there is not one already) and then get someone
to qualify it for the
2004 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] building LLVM (question about ELF class)
Hi,
Thanks for the replies in the mailing list. I made some progress in
building LLVM, but I still have a problem about ELF class. I am working
with LLVM on a sparcv9 machine, while the gcc is configured to emit 32-bit
binary by default. After executing "configure --with-llvmgccdir=...
--enable-jit", I modified Makefile.config so it contains
CXX = g++ -mcpu=v9 -m64
CC := gcc -mcpu=v9
2009 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.6 cygwin build fails
Hi,
I'm trying to build LLVM 2.6 (from svn branch release_26) on cygwin
1.7, and I have the following errors with both GCC 3.4.4 and GCC 4.3.4
llvm[2]: Linking Release Loadable Module profile_rt.dll
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld:
warning: cannot find entry symbol __cygwin_dll_entry at 12; defaulting to
62fc1000
2009 Aug 28
1
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] 'make install' woes
I am getting the following on 'make install' on Cygwin both on debug and
release builds :-
llvm[3]: Installing Release /home/ang/llvm-coff/bin/llvmc.exe
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-coff/tools/llvmc/driver'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-coff/tools/llvmc'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-coff/tools'
make[1]: Entering
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>:
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
>> 2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>:
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>>>
>>>>> To test clang:
>>>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source.
>>>>
>>>> LLVM
2009 Oct 20
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> 2009/10/20 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>:
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>>
>>>> To test clang:
>>>> 1) Compile llvm and clang from source.
>>>
>>> LLVM fails to build for me on Cygwin. I get:
>>>
>>
>> Does TOT build? If not,
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] Features.h not being found now on trunk compiling under Debian Sid
Not sure what would have changed to break this but os_defines.h citing
features.h is no longer being found in the system paths.
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.7/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/os_defines.h:40:10:
> fatal error:
> * 'features.h' file not found
> #include <features.h>*
> ^
>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
2012 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] Building past few days with Clang++ and Clang produces errors on Cmake for Debian Linux
*System:* Debian Linux Sid/Unstable amd64
*LLVM/Clang:* Trunk
*Scenario:* In the past couple of days I've been compiling against trunk
I get two separate and spurious hang ups with CMake.
*Note:* I build against more than just X86 follow along the progress of
other platforms, though just building for X86 produces the same results
below.
*Assumption:* Configure cmake with prior built
2008 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] Move instruction
Hi all,
Can anybody tell me how to generate a mov instruction in llvm. I found out there is a MemMove Inst but I dont think that is what I want.
I want to bypass a load instruction. So i need to generate a mov instruction which will help me remove the redundant load.
Thanks
--
Abhinav Karhu
MS Computer Science
Georgia Institute of Technology
2008 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] Move instruction
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Karhu, Abhinav R <akarhu3 at gatech.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Can anybody tell me how to generate a mov instruction in llvm. I found out there is a MemMove Inst but I dont think that is what I want.
> I want to bypass a load instruction. So i need to generate a mov instruction which will help me remove the redundant load.
At the LLVM IL level,
2008 Nov 15
1
[LLVMdev] Move instruction
Hi Eli,
I want to do redundant load elimination. A simple example for that would be
load (a1) , r1;
---
---
---
load (a2) , r2;
Now if a1 and a2 are alias of each other and the value stored in a1 and a2 remains the same then I can say that the second load is redundant.
I can replace the second load with these instructions
mov r0 r1;
mov r0 r2; and remove the load instruction.
This is the thing
2011 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] Problem with compiling the runtime libary
Hi, Zhao
You can apply the attachment to LLVM 2.9 Release. It has been tested
on FreeBSD/x86.
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
-------------- next part --------------
diff -ruN llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt llvm-2.9.new/CMakeLists.txt
--- llvm-2.9/CMakeLists.txt 2011-03-02
2009 Sep 01
1
[LLVMdev] Problem building libprofile.
Hi,
when I try to build libprofile with r80670 (both llvm and llvm-gcc) I
get this error:
make[1]: Entering directory `.../llvm-svn-debug-obj/runtime/libprofile'
llvm[1]: Building Debug Bytecode Archive libprofile_rt.bca (internalize)
llvm[1]: Installing Debug Shared Library
/nfs/a5/astifter/astifter/llvm/llvm-svn-debug-obj/../llvm-svn-debug-install/lib/libprofile_rt.so
0 llvm-ld
2011 Apr 24
2
[LLVMdev] Problem with compiling the runtime libary
Hi Nick
Thanks for you reply.
CMAKE is very new to me. I complied using GNU WIN32 and got those errors. Is
it possible to compile it using GNU WIN 32 and anything need to be modified?
I managed to compile the run time library on a mac machine.
Yafan
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> yafan zhao wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>> Thanks for
2009 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
Hello,
Bill Wendling wrote:
> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It
> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it.
I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux but
I get the following build error with TOT (out-of-source autoconf build):
[...]
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/melis/c/llvm-svn-release/tools'
2008 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Move instruction
r2->replaceAllUsesWith(r1);
r2->eraseFromParent();
LLVM makes it easy! ;-)
--Owen
On Nov 15, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Karhu, Abhinav R wrote:
> Hi owen,
> Can you please elaborate as to what should I do? Find all the
> instruction which have r2 in it and replace all of them with r1 and
> then remove the load instruction?
> Thanks
> Abhinav
> ----- Original Message
2009 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
Jim Grosbach wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Bill Wendling wrote:
>>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It
>>> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it.
>> I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux
>> but
>> I
2009 Aug 30
3
[LLVMdev] Build(s) broken? (was: Re: Buildbots: Apology and Explanation)
On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Paul Melis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Before we had buildbots, a random patch would break the system. It
>> would sometimes take a whole day to determine which patch broke it.
> I see the buildbots are currently showing no problem on 32-bit linux
> but
> I get the following build error with TOT (out-of-source autoconf