similar to: [LLVMdev] Configuration for building llvm on Sun T1 machine?

When I try to print out a instruction by the following way, I am getting the error message below. Anyone knows what's the problem? Instruction* inst; ... inst-print(cerr); testbuild.cpp:178: error: no matching function for call to 'llvm::Instruction::print(llvm::OStream&)' /x/pchsu/llvm/llvm-2.4/include/llvm/Value.h:83: note: candidates are: void

In the file \lib\Support\Process.cpp on line 60, it seems as though an unnecessary heap allocation and memory leak occurs. This is the offending code: static TimeValue getElapsedWallTime() { static TimeValue &StartTime = *new TimeValue(TimeValue::now()); return TimeValue::now() - StartTime; } The issue is that the StartTime variable's value is allocated on the heap, after which a

Replace __time_t with time_t in my question. I've compiled function: std::string TimeValue::toString() const { // Alas, asctime is not re-entrant on Windows... //hb: __time64_t ourTime = this->toEpochTime(); time_t ourTime = this->toEpochTime(); //hb: char* buffer = ::asctime(::_localtime64(&ourTime)); char* buffer = ::asctime(::localtime(&ourTime)); std::string

I'm not sure. Perhaps Jeff Cohen knows as he wrote this. Reid. On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 11:51, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Is it necessary to use the VC6.1+ `__time64_t' type instead of __time_t in > win32/TimeValue.cpp? > > --------------- > In file included from > c:/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/lib/System/TimeValue.cpp:51: >

Hi, Is it necessary to use the VC6.1+ `__time64_t' type instead of __time_t in win32/TimeValue.cpp? --------------- In file included from c:/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/lib/System/TimeValue.cpp:51: c:/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-1-1/lib/System/platform/TimeValue.cpp: In member function `std::string llvm::sys::TimeValue::toString() const':

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Bryan Keiren > Subject: [LLVMdev] getElapsedWallTime unnecessary heap allocation and memory leak > In the file \lib\Support\Process.cpp on line 60, it seems as though an > unnecessary heap allocation and memory leak occurs. > static TimeValue getElapsedWallTime() { >  static

Hello I am running opensuse 11 on a Sun x4150 32GB RAM 2 quad x86_64 E5450''s. It has a SAS PCI-Express LSI 3081E Host Bus Adapter (a rebranded Adaptec RAID 5805 it seems) running in a RAID 5 config. Xen in this setup is 3.2.1. The kernel is 2.6.25.18 The problem I have is that when I try to run a the xen kernel the RAID device is not found . I get messages on the console of

Hi Reid, You've got a TimeValue.cpp which it looks like you just added to lib/System, but I can't compile it on Darwin because there's no Darwin/TimeValue.cpp. This breaks my ppc build. I'm not sure what TimeValue was supposed to be for, so I just blew it away in my tree. Please take a look at this. -Brian -- gaeke at uiuc.edu

This should be fixed. Sorry for the breakage. I forgot to commit a bunch of files. Reid. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 20:33, Brian R. Gaeke wrote: > Hi Reid, > > You've got a TimeValue.cpp which it looks like you just added to lib/System, > but I can't compile it on Darwin because there's no Darwin/TimeValue.cpp. > This breaks my ppc build. I'm not sure what TimeValue

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Bryan Keiren < bryan.keiren at guerrilla-games.com> wrote: > We are indeed trying to completely clean the heap before exiting main(). > Which means that you either don't have threads, or you join all threads before main exits. Is that the case? Good for you if so! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Caldarale, Charles R

Here are the FreeBSD and Win32 versions of TimeValue.cpp (along with all the other Win32 changes I've submitted that have yet to be comitted). Note there is a bug in all the Unix versions in that the time is not being converted from the Posix origin of 1/1/1970. On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:06:37 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > This should be fixed. Sorry for the

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95 > benchmarks ? > > I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am not > sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them seem to use > smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago, so few people

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > which suggests the compiling command: > gcc -DSPEC_CPU95 -O2 -o spec_go g2.c g22.c g23.c g25.c g26.c g27a.c g27b.c > g28.c g29.c g2eye.c g2jlib2.c g2jos.c g2list.c g2reas.c g2s2.c g2s3.c g2shp.c > and the running commandline: > ./spec_go 50 9 2stone9.in > < are these correct ? > I believe that we only include test/train inputs for

If you're getting this error in lib/System/Win32/TimeValue.cpp, then you are not building it correctly. This file is included by lib/System/TimeValue.cpp, which is what you ought to be building. None of the files under Win32 are to be compiled directly; they are all included by files in lib/System. On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:14:18 +0100 Morten Ofstad <morten at hue.no> wrote: > Hello,

Some of the run commandlines don't seem to be the *default ref* configuration. For instance, in 099.go, what's in the script is: LEVEL = ../../../.. BM=099.go ifeq ($(RUN_TYPE),test) STDIN_FILENAME = /dev/null STDOUT_FILENAME = null.out RUN_OPTIONS = 40 19 else STDIN_FILENAME = 2stone9.in STDOUT_FILENAME = 2stone9.out RUN_OPTIONS = 50 9 endif include ../../Makefile.spec95

I am running 4.8-STABLE. I recently did a cvsup (repeatedly, most recently today). Ever since, portupgrade dies with the following messages: zircon# portupgrade -r pkgconfig /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:310:in `deorigin': failed to convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:903:in `tsort_build' from

llvm-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Fw: (by sospeng at tom.com)something is wrong , when compiling llvm on debian > From: > "4" <sospeng at tom.com> > Date: > Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:05:46 +0800 (CST) > To: > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > To: > llvmdev at

Hi: I don't know if it is a bug or what? I followed instructions. Jean R version: R-2.2.1 OS: Linux RedHat 9 I followed the instructions. tar -xvf, configure, then make. I get these error messages at the end of make and with make check. ================================================================== ================================================================== In file

Hi, As per discussion in CCCP (Centos Community Container Pipeline) project, it was recommended to create a wiki page for "Atomic Registry" on wiki.centos.org. I am therefore requesting a creation of the same, along-with a homepage. I am not decided as to where in the wiki (location) of the proposed page will be, and am there looking out for suggestions. My wiki.centos.org

I'm trying to get clang 3.6.1 to compile itself on Windows, using this command line: msbuild /p:Configuration=Release /p:CLToolExe=clang-cl.exe /p:CLToolPath=c:\llvm\build\Release\bin\ /p:TrackFileAccess=false /p:Platform="x64" /fileLogger ALL_BUILD.vcxproj It barfed on an occurrence of __try but that was only in a test file so I commented it out and retried. Now it's getting