Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Makefile dependency problems"
2005 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Typo in Makefile.rules and suugestion for Makefile.config.in
1) I find typo in Makefile.rules in printvars rule:
- $(Echo) "Preconditions: " '$(Preconditions)'
+ $(Echo) "PreConditions: " '$(PreConditions)'
2) In Makefile.config.in PROJ_SRC_DIR define for LLVM build mode as
PROJ_SRC_DIR := $(subst //,/,$(LLVM_SRC_ROOT)/$(patsubst
$(PROJ_OBJ_ROOT)%,%,$(PROJ_OBJ_DIR)))
and for other project build mode as
PROJ_SRC_DIR
2005 Jan 26
0
[LLVMdev] Some bugs (?) in LLVM Makefile.rules file
Reading Makefile.rules i found some unclear places in file:
Line 553:
LinkMOdule += -Xlinker -internalize-public-api-file=$(EXPORTED_SYMBOL_FILE)
Maybe it must be LinkModule += ... ?
Line 1283:
DistCheckDir := $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/_distcheckdir
Maybe it must be:
DistCheckDir := $(PROJ_OBJ_ROOT)/_distcheckdir
Vladimir
2005 Feb 05
3
[LLVMdev] Improving Makefile.rules header install rules [PATCH]
>> Is attached patch acceptable?
>
> Looks great, applied, thanks!
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050131/023931.html
Thanks!
>> Also I have in Makefile.rules (but not include in patch) some
>> modification for simplify used common Makefile.rules in LLVM projects and
>> non-LLVM project (guarding some LLVM specific parts by ifdef
2013 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] Using 'llvm-build' for out-of-tree projects
Hi LLVM-folks,
is there a way to use the llvm-build tool for out-of-tree projects?
Makefile.rules supposes llvm-build to be located in PROJ_SRC_ROOT and this
does not hold for out-of-tree projects, the same applies to
Makefile.llvmbuild that is searched for in PROJ_OBJ_ROOT. I think
PROJ_SRC_ROOT should be replaced by LLVM_SRC_ROOT and PROJ_OBJ_ROOT should
be replaced by LLVM_OBJ_ROOT, right?
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some
>>>
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some
>> tests (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native?
>>
>
> I'd really like the default behavior to be
2012 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> wrote:
2013 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] Using 'llvm-build' for out-of-tree projects
Hi Fabian,
> is there a way to use the llvm-build tool for out-of-tree projects?
> Makefile.rules supposes llvm-build to be located in PROJ_SRC_ROOT and this does
> not hold for out-of-tree projects, the same applies to Makefile.llvmbuild that
> is searched for in PROJ_OBJ_ROOT. I think PROJ_SRC_ROOT should be replaced by
> LLVM_SRC_ROOT and PROJ_OBJ_ROOT should be replaced by
2015 Jul 29
0
[LLVMdev] ConfigStatusScript Confusion
I’ve run into a bizarre error in which LLVM_SRC/Makefile.rules is trying to access a file that doesn’t exist, even though I’ve made sure to correctly reference the needed file. In LLVM_SRC/Makefile.rules, lines 183 and 184 reference the variable ConfigStatusScript, which is defined as $(PROJ_OBJ_ROOT)/config.status. Given the way PROJ_OBJ_ROOT is defined, this means ConfigStatusScript is defined
2012 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some tests (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native?
-Chris
On Nov 30, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We consistently see test failures arising because by default many of our tests run in a mode where the tool (clang or llc) pick host-dependent behavior.
2015 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
On 6/18/15 6:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Long term we don't want to keep the burden of two build systems in
> tree. CMake is turning out to be the build system we want because of
> its multi-platform support, etc and as soon as the CMake system can do
> everything we can do with the autoconf/makefile build I plan on
> turning down the support for that
2012 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Change tests to run with fixed (not-host dependent) triple
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> I'm ok with this in principle, but how about with the nuance that some
> tests (eg test/codegen) explicitly opt into march=native?
>
I'd really like the default behavior to be something that forces the test
to either be independent of the targeted triple, or explicitly set a
target. I like the
2009 Aug 25
0
[LLVMdev] std::cout << *MyModule does not work anymore
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:
> It seems that support for dumping text representation of LLVM objects to
> standard channels and C++ output streams was removed. My guess is that
> now we must use errs() instead of std::cerr, llvm::raw_fd_ostream
> instead of std::ofstream, etc.
Correct. std::ostream has been purged from LLVM; the only
2010 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: 2.7 code freeze in 1.5 weeks
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
> I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya.
>
> I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down
> miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the
> "early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for
> 2.7.
>
> Tanya, I can
2016 Feb 29
0
Sys.readlink (on BSD vs Linux)
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:59 AM, Sven Templer <sven.templer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> sorry for not being clear enough.
>
> My problem is represented with the following code, running on OSX:
>
> mkdir ~/test
> ln -s ~/test ~/testlink
> touch ~/test/foo
> Rscript -e 'Sys.readlink(c("~/test/foo", "~/testlink/foo"));
2009 Aug 25
4
[LLVMdev] std::cout << *MyModule does not work anymore
It seems that support for dumping text representation of LLVM objects to
standard channels and C++ output streams was removed. My guess is that
now we must use errs() instead of std::cerr, llvm::raw_fd_ostream
instead of std::ofstream, etc.
The changes are not trivial, as for instance llvm::raw_fd_ostream
without flags fails if the file exists, but std::ofstream does not. The
changes include
2015 Jun 19
4
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com>
> To: "John Criswell" <jtcriswel at gmail.com>, LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu, "Chris Bieneman" <beanz at apple.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 7:14:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
>
>
> On
2016 Jan 06
0
[klibc:master] Implement realpath()
Commit-ID: 32b36eb98fafad924f3f69904d74d2f2168a4753
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=32b36eb98fafad924f3f69904d74d2f2168a4753
Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
AuthorDate: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:08:47 +0000
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:48:43 -0800
[klibc] Implement realpath()
This
2010 Feb 13
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: 2.7 code freeze in 1.5 weeks
I am definitely in favor of this if it is ok with Tanya.
I hope to spend some time in the next few weeks on tracking down
miscompiles, and it would be great to get Clang to the
"early-but-usable-beta" stage so it makes sense to roll binaries for
2.7.
Tanya, I can also do the x86-32-pc-linux release testing if no one
else steps up.
- Daniel
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Douglas
2003 Jan 21
1
Long pauses.
I have an environment consisting of:
* Primary Workstation running Win2KPro
* Secondary Workstation runing WinNTSP6a
* Local Win2K Advanced Server
* Local Solaris 8 system with Samba 2.0.7
* Remote HP-UX system at Site A with Samba 1.9.18p10 connected via VPN
* Remote Unixware system at Site B with Vison(?) file sharing connected via VPN
* Three remote Win2K server boxes at Site C connected via