similar to: [LLVMdev] SwitchInstr::removeCase() doesn't remove PHINodes' predecessors

Nuno Lopes wrote: > PHINode should have one entry for each predecessor of its parent basic > block! > %ret.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %ifthen ], [ 1, %ifelse ] ; <i32> > [#uses=1] > Broken module found, compilation aborted! > > This is because myphi is not reachable from ifthen anymore. My question is: > is this a bug (or missing feature) or do I need to

Hi, Simple description of the problem below. I have code coming into pruneEH as follows fn a { entry: call fn b ... for_cond: %i = phi [1, entry] [%x, for_body] cmp $i with someval cond-br for_body or for_exit for_body: ... $x = $i + 1 branch for_cond for_exit ... } PruneEH determines that the call to fn-b won't return. The code is modified thus. fn a { entry: call fn b unreachable insn

Hi, On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Today, the IR requires that if you have multiple edges from A to B >> (typically with a switch) any phi nodes in B must have an equal number of >> entries for A, but that all of them must have the same value. > >> This seems rather annoying.... >> 1) It

I'm looking into some missed optimizations where CodeGenPrepare seems to leave trivially dead instructions lying around. This happens because CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction calls ConstantFoldTerminator which folds a "br i1 false" into an unconditional branch and calls BasicBlock::removePredecessor which calls PHINode::removeIncomingValue. Each incoming value that is removed from a

I like how some cds, such as the windows installer discs will skip booting from the disc if you accidentally left the drive because they require you to hit a key to make them actually boot from the disc. I've kind of tried to emulate this behavior using chain.c32, but, it requires me to specify which harddrive, and I'd rather see an independant setup. I've tried localboot -1, but, it

Hi, I want to insert a conditional branch in the middle of a basic block. To that end, I am doing these steps: (1) Split the basic block: bb->splitBasicBlock() (2) Remove the old terminator: succ->removePredecessor(bb) bb->getTerminator()->getParent() (3) Adding a new terminator: BranchInst::Create(ifTrue, ifFalse, cnd, "", bb); That seems to work, but later passes

On Aug 11, 2008, at 2:02 PM, Benedict Gaster wrote: > We would like to develop a code generator using LLVM for a target > language that does not support conditional branches and in fact only > supports structured control flow, eg. If and while. What's the difference between an "if" and a conditional branch? > As far as I can tell that the problem with doing this in

Hi All, I am using a specialized aggregation function to reduce a dataset with multiple rows per id down to 1 row per id. My function work perfect when there are >1 id but alters the 'var.g' in undesirable ways when this condition is not met, Therefore, I have been trying ifthen() statements to keep the original value when length of unique id == 1 but I cannot get it to work. e.g.:

We would like to develop a code generator using LLVM for a target language that does not support conditional branches and in fact only supports structured control flow, eg. If and while. As far as I can tell that the problem with doing this in LLVM today, is that it does not support these high-level constructs and instead all control flow is implemented as branches. It is ³fairly²

Hi, Comments inline. Ben On 12/08/2008 03:14, "Owen Anderson" <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> We would like to develop a code generator using LLVM for a target language >> that does not support conditional branches and in fact only supports >> structured control flow, eg. If and while. What's the difference between an "if" and a conditional

Hi all, for(pred_iterator PI=pred_begin(BB); PI!=pred_end(BB); PI++) { BasicBlock *Pres = *PI; pred.insert(Pres); } for(predit = pred.begin(); predit!=pred.end();predit++) (BB)->removePredecessor(*predit); Is this code enough to remove the predecessor for each basic block As I read in documentation that this removePredecessor() doesn't update the predecessor list. So,

On May 8, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Nick Johnson wrote: > I want to insert a conditional branch in the middle of a basic block. > To that end, I am doing these steps: > > (1) Split the basic block: > bb->splitBasicBlock() > > (2) Remove the old terminator: > succ->removePredecessor(bb) > bb->getTerminator()->getParent() Assuming that the new block will still be a

Hello Folks, When I run the document below through sweave, rgui.exe/rsession.exe leaves a file handle open to the sweave-001.pdf graphic (as verified by process explorer). Pdflatex.exe then crashes (with a Permission Denied error) because the graphic file is locked. This only seems to happen when there is an error in the sweave document. When there are no errors, no file handles are left open.

Hi All, I need to remove successors from every basic block to insert new ones I tried this code, but it doesn't work void RemoveSuccessor(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum) { assert(SuccNum < TI->getNumSuccessors() && "Trying to remove a nonexistant successor!"); // If our old successor block contains any PHI nodes, remove the entry in the //

Hi all, I have encountered the following instruction: %.0.i = phi i8* [ %9, %8 ], [ %11, %10 ] How can I get the %8 and %10? I'm using http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PHINode.html as a reference but I cannot understand how to do that. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I find Sweave very useful and I was trying to combine it with the latex package fancyvrb. I was trying to get line numbering and labels in order to reference the lines where particular commands occur. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to figure out how to do it. Maybe somebody can help me. The following is a sample Rnw file: the first part shows what I would like to get, the second what I

I have a matrix with a set of variables one of which is a factor. Using by() I have calculated something about each group (say the sum). Now I want to create a new variable in the original matrix that contains the results of the by() for each observation that is in the corresponding group. For example I have: --------- a <-c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) b

I'm trying to use R CMD Rd2dvi and I end up at a Latex (I think) command prompt. What's missing or what am I suppose to do? Paul Gilbert _______ paul at breman:/apps/dse-versions/2000.6/dse#R CMD Rd2dvi syskern This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3) (Rd2.tex LaTeX2e <1998/12/01> Babel <v3.6k> and hyphenation patterns for american, french, german, ngerman, nohyphenation,

Hi, I am working with regular dominator tree and not MachineDominatorTree. I wanted to modify the CFG structure and for that I need to change successor of a basic block. How can I do that? Or is there a way to cast a BasicBlock to MachineBasicBlock so that i can use functions addSucessor and removeSuccessor for the basic block. It will be great if someone can help. regards, Ambika

OK. Thanks. And if I removed "case 4:" for example. Need I scan all phi nodes and fix it, by removing one predecessor (if it exists) to switch's parent block? -Stepan. Nick Lewycky wrote: > Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Looking at test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/preserve-analyses.ll, I found >> improper phi instruction at string #122: >>