similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 76

Hi everyone. Because there is still a little confusion about the huge document, I want to know what llvm can provide when we customize our new compiler? For example, a normal compiler includes lexer, parser, intermediate code generator , optimizer and target code generator. According to llvm documents, it seems that llvm can provide a better intermediate code presentation. And what else can it

"Cloud Strife" <geforce8800 at gmail.com> writes: > Thank you very much for your reply. > However, my question is not completely solved. > I svned the latest version of the llvm. After I open in the visual studio > 2005, the building errors are still there and there was not any .exe > executable file output. > I set the Fibonacci project under the solution as my

HI everyone. I am using visual studio 2005 and windows xp to compile the llvm project. I downloaded the project with svn client. I thought this action may gurantee my code is up to date and integrate. However, after I opened the solution located in the win32 directory and build the solution, the visual studio output many many errors, and even few projects can be compiled to generate runable .exe

Thank you very much for your reply. However, my question is not completely solved. I svned the latest version of the llvm. After I open in the visual studio 2005, the building errors are still there and there was not any .exe executable file output. I set the Fibonacci project under the solution as my startup project and issue the debug-run command. However, the vs 2005 just prompted me that the

I just rebooted my desktop system to pick up the 5.1 kernel, etc. One oddity I noticed is that the contents of /etc/redhat-release still says: [root at bend etc]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5 (Final) but: [root at bend etc]# rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/redhat-release centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1 On my CentOS 4 box, /etc/redhat-release says: [dave at fraud ~]# cat

[please keep discussion on-list. thanks] "Cloud Strife" <geforce8800 at gmail.com> writes: > Thank you very much for your help. Now this problem has been solved and I > have got a workable project. > > I am trying the example in the llvm\docs\tutorial\LangImpl4.html > . However, after I put the whole source code into my customized project, > there is an error

This is an abbreviated version of an e-mail that I also posted to the ndiswrapper mailing list. Compressing the long story, I ran into the same problem using CentOS 5 as I had with Fedora Core 6 and ndiswrapper: my laptop (HP Pavilion zv6000 series with a Broadcom BCM43xx wireless NIC) would lock up or spontaneously reboot after a few hours if I brought up the wireless interface. I also

I decided to try the x86_64 version of CentOS 5 on my new desktop since it has an Athlon 64 X2 CPU. The one really perplexing oddity is that the monitor no longer goes to power save mode (standby) if the system is idle long enough (e.g., overnight). The "power management" option is set to put the display to sleep after thirty minutes. The display gets blanked but it never goes to

Hi everyone.I am using the visual stuido 2005 to build the lastesllvm source code. After the building phase, the vs 2005 dump two errors with the lli and llc. Here is the message: the Error 1549 error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "class llvm::FunctionPass * __cdecl llvm::createPBQPRegisterAllocator(void)" (?createPBQPRegisterAllocator at llvm@@YAPAVFunctionPass at 1@XZ)

Hey guys,I am a 3rd year Computer Science undergrad student.I a extremely interested in contributing code to the XAPIAN project. The work you people do sounds extremely fascinating and interesting.Can someone just give me a brief overview of how to proceed ?. I Can code in C,C++ and Python and have experience in Natural Lanuage Processing.Am also quite comfortable with NLTK and using Wordnet.Am

Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:30 -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> > I have a CentOS 5.2 server running Apache 2.2.3 (yum installed) and >> > drupal 6.5 on ESX 3.5. We're using Name Based Virtual Hosting on it - >> > 2 hosts. The problem is that when I pull up a web page after not >> > having accessed

Since upgrading my server from CentOS 4.5 to 4.6 I've been getting the following error from amanda backups: mutilate /home lev 1 FAILED [compress got signal 11, /bin/tar got signal 13] I was away from the house for most of the end of December and had a couple of other issues that came up that could have been related but apparently weren't (why is it that several things all go wrong

Hello With the latest LLVM from Subversion (rev48737 from http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk) I'm getting make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Lang/llvm/_Obj/lib/AsmParser' llvm[2]: Flexing Lexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Debug build /usr/src/Lang/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l: In function 'int llvmAsmlex()': /usr/src/Lang/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:278: error:

Hi. For weeks now I have problems compiling llvm from svn, compilation ends with llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Release build /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l: In function 'int llvmAsmlex()': /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:278: error: 'PURE' was not declared in this scope /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:279: error: 'CONST'

Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com> wrote: > Can't argue with you :-) It does seem likely, as 1GB flash drives wouldn't > have been a possibility at that time. I never owned one at all until > relatively recently. > > >>> > > They didn't work in 98 first edition, nor in NT4 or Win2000 - again, from >>> > > memory,

Hi Daniel, attached is a patch that pushes most of the object file specific parsing out of AsmParser and down into MachOAsmParser. This was done as a cleanup for the ELF work. I know that you're not happy with this approach, particularly the fact that as we add more object file formats and assembler dialects, it's going to cause a class explosion. But I was hoping that we could use this

Hi, I'm playing around with llvm and the Kaleidoscope tutorial and first of all I have to say I'm really impressed. LLVM rocks! Unfortunately I've now run into a linker error while trying to optimize the IR or turn it to bitcode and likely due to my very limited experience with c++ I just can't figure out how to resolve it. The linker complains that the llvm::WriteBitcodeToFile

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > >

Aaron Gray wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca> > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>>> wrote:

Ryan Taylor wrote: > Nick, > > Ah, forgot the -o, thanks, silly mistake. > > So how would you extract "add" from the instruction "%A"? I->getOpcodeName(). > Yes, this is sort of what I am trying to do. The instnamer works fine > for the local variables and I already had the constants sorted out. Great! Nick > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at