similar to: [LLVMdev] What can llvm provide when writing a new compiler?

Thank you very much for replying. Then I have another question: Before I start, I want to choose the best platform to develop my project. Would you please tell what is the best OS platform to develop the llvm project? There are several choices: Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Linux and Windows. Your opinion is eagerly expected. Thank you :-) > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:44:33 -0700 >

Hey guys,I am a 3rd year Computer Science undergrad student.I a extremely interested in contributing code to the XAPIAN project. The work you people do sounds extremely fascinating and interesting.Can someone just give me a brief overview of how to proceed ?. I Can code in C,C++ and Python and have experience in Natural Lanuage Processing.Am also quite comfortable with NLTK and using Wordnet.Am

HI everyone. I am using visual studio 2005 and windows xp to compile the llvm project. I downloaded the project with svn client. I thought this action may gurantee my code is up to date and integrate. However, after I opened the solution located in the win32 directory and build the solution, the visual studio output many many errors, and even few projects can be compiled to generate runable .exe

"Cloud Strife" <geforce8800 at gmail.com> writes: > Thank you very much for your reply. > However, my question is not completely solved. > I svned the latest version of the llvm. After I open in the visual studio > 2005, the building errors are still there and there was not any .exe > executable file output. > I set the Fibonacci project under the solution as my

Hi. For weeks now I have problems compiling llvm from svn, compilation ends with llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Release build /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l: In function 'int llvmAsmlex()': /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:278: error: 'PURE' was not declared in this scope /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:279: error: 'CONST'

Hello With the latest LLVM from Subversion (rev48737 from http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk) I'm getting make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Lang/llvm/_Obj/lib/AsmParser' llvm[2]: Flexing Lexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Debug build /usr/src/Lang/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l: In function 'int llvmAsmlex()': /usr/src/Lang/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:278: error:

Thank you very much for your reply. However, my question is not completely solved. I svned the latest version of the llvm. After I open in the visual studio 2005, the building errors are still there and there was not any .exe executable file output. I set the Fibonacci project under the solution as my startup project and issue the debug-run command. However, the vs 2005 just prompted me that the

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Well, maybe, we should just change the Linux kernel instead of tweaking > our tokenizer too hard. > This is silly. Writing a simple and maintainable lexer is not hard (look e.g. at https://reviews.llvm.org/D10817). There are some complicated context-sensitive cases in linker scripts that break our approach

Is this the appropriate place for GSoC conversations? If I understand the proposal correctly, there should be a lexer (written in R) that exposes an API; that API would be used by segregated mini-parsers (Roclets) which do the dirty work of Roxygen -> {html, LaTeX, DocBook, ...} translation. The lexer should ship with a proof-of-concept Roclet. Have I missed anything?

Hi everyone.I am using the visual stuido 2005 to build the lastesllvm source code. After the building phase, the vs 2005 dump two errors with the lli and llc. Here is the message: the Error 1549 error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "class llvm::FunctionPass * __cdecl llvm::createPBQPRegisterAllocator(void)" (?createPBQPRegisterAllocator at llvm@@YAPAVFunctionPass at 1@XZ)

>> Lexing is the one issue though. > > How do you mean? I think he's observing that a majority of the tutorial code is actually spent on the lexer and parser, not on the llvm-specific pieces. > I'm just fiddling around with it now. The lexer, parser and AST > written using > camlp4 might look something like this in OCaml: Sure, the existing tutorial would be

> Hmm..., the crux of not being able to lex arithmetic expressions seems to > be due to lack of context sensitivity. E.g. consider `foo*bar`. Could be a > multiplication, or could be a glob pattern. > > Looking at the code more closely, adding context sensitivity wouldn't be > that hard. In fact, our ScriptParserBase class is actually a lexer (look at > the interface; it

On Sunday 25 November 2007 05:28, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007 03:42, Christopher Lamb wrote: > >> Try this google query. I know there's been some discussion/work on > >> OCaml and LLVM. > >> > >> site:lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev OCaml interface > > > > I just rediscovered the OCaml bindings in bindings/ocaml

Hello, I would like to gather some ideas and opinions on how to make the default AsmLexer more flexible when dealing with Identifiers. When the lexer emits something as an "Identifier" (read. String of characters) it means that it needs to be parsed all at once in a single go, even if it contains elements that might be wanted to be parsed as separate entities. In that case it is needed

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Sean, > > So as you noticed that linker script tokenization rule is not very trivial > -- it is context sensitive. The current lexer is extremely simple and > almost always works well. Improving "almost always" to "perfect" is not > high priority because we have many more high

Hello: I've been trying for days now to get igraph working on a debian sarge install. There does not appear to be any pre-built packages, and when I try and install within R, it blows up on the final linking, claiming its unable to find libgfortran (which IS installed, and IS working for all other users of the compiler). I started up R and ran: install.packages("igraph"). It

Hi, I am trying to understand LLVM. Can an expert tell me how to compare the kaleidoscope implementation with the LLVM's compiler implementation. I mean can anyone tell me about the lexer, parser, codegen related .cpp and .h files inside the LLVM solution project. I would like to understand the LLVM's compiler in the same way that the kaleidoscope compiler is explained. Thanks a lot.

Hi, I'm having a hard time finding an answer to what I assume is a very basic idea. I'm trying to produce this llvm code using the LLVM api: %myString = alloca [13 x i8], i32 13 store [13 x i8] c"Hello world.\00", [13 x i8]* %myString %tmp1 = getelementptr [13 x i8]* %myString, i32 0, i32 0 %tmp2 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf( i8* %tmp1 ) nounwind A simple Hello

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Nancy <nancydreaming at gmail.com> wrote: >> First, you could switch to ld.gold instead of ld.bfd. It uses much > $ln -s `which gold` /usr/local/bin/ld > >> the idea. I think for autoconf you need ".../configure >> --enable-split-dwarf" to use this. >> > $.../configure --enable-targets=x86 --enable-split-dwarf >

All, I''ve run into a snag. I need to handle the display of elements on my page and I want to use my Javascript event handlers on page load. However, my BODY tag is trapped in my generic layout. I''m thinking that I can put an onLoad on the BODY tag that will just call a Javascript method called initializePage() and then provide this initializePage() call in my specific page