similar to: [LLVMdev] Web Server Problems Persist

John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Our web server problems are persisting. I may need to restart the web > server while diagnosing the problem. I'll send email once I'm done. > Okay. I think it's working now. The web server was getting a lot of traffic that was maxing out the maximum number of Apache processes, but the traffic seems to have ceased, and a

Hi John, > If you run into problems, please email llvmdev. I'll periodically check > llvm.org to make sure it's still up. I'm seeing long delays on llvm.org again. Pages are served eventually, but it takes minutes for each requests. Are there any dynamic scripts on the server that can eat a lot of resources? I think the nightly tester result pages would qualify? Perhaps

My understanding was that using the :post=>true on a link_to() was supposed to prevent search engine crawlers from triggering the link. However, this does not seem to be working for me. Is there something else that I should be/can be doing to accomplish this? Thanks. -Matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Among other things, I run an http server on my home DSL line (6M/768kbit). The content includes several large image galleries, and when certain crawlers hit our server w/ multiple large image uploads, we end up with large ping time delays - sufficient to disrupt the kids'' on-line gaming. Attempts to control this with robots.txt has not be very successful; Solaris IPQoS appears quite

Hi All, I've finally implemented my proposed changes to the testing documentation. I think I fixed up the naming everywhere, but I did only a single pass over the document, so I might have missed something. Review welcome :-) It is now recommended to put the test suite in "projects/test-suite" instead of "projects/llvm-test". I've also updated the configure script and

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Mike Stump wrote: > On May 21, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: >> Any thoughts or suggestions on how to do this testing in a >> structured manner? > > I think that if what you're doing is sound, and you get the results > you want, say, on compiling something like gcc with it and others > review the basic idea (hi evan or chris) and

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > indexing the llvm.org svn archive. This means that when you search for > an > > LLVM-related symbol in code search, you get one of the many (possibly > > out-of-date) mirrors, rather than the up-to-date llvm.org version. This > is > > sad. > This is intentional. The

Hi, just a quick email. I've been working on a patch to simplifycfg last week and want to test its performance. I've ran the test-suite succesfully, both with the patched and unpatched versions. However, I could find no easy way to compare both results. I see that the web pages of the nightly tester provide nice results (changes compared to the day before, together with percentages and

Hello, I'm running an apache 2.2 webserver on centos 5.3. I'm seeing frequent requests for robots.txt and favicon.ico from the logs those files should be in the document root area. What are these files, is this something the rpm installs, or do i have to retrieve or generate them? Thanks. Dave.

Great! To really finish this work, the nightly tester script needs to be updated. Its currently full of llvm-test references. Would you be willing to modify this as well? Thanks, Tanya On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi All, > > I've finally implemented my proposed changes to the testing documentation. I > think I fixed up the naming everywhere, but I did only

On May 21, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Any thoughts or suggestions on how to do this testing in a > structured manner? I think that if what you're doing is sound, and you get the results you want, say, on compiling something like gcc with it and others review the basic idea (hi evan or chris) and like it, just checking it in and watching the performance numbers

Hello all, I was just wondering if anybody knew whether mechanize is supposed to be thread-safe or not? I didn''t really find any information about it anywhere. I''ve been getting a strange error in protocol.rb when I run a script that uses mechanize in a multi threaded fashion, but not with a single thread. I''m trying to write a spider that does multiple gets in

Hello, For those of you who have solved the learning hurdle of rails deployment, all I can say is congratulations! I''m struggling, frustrated that my app, which runs so well on my linux box, generates such odd errors on my vps and completely fails to do anything. For example, at the moment my production.log file has the error: ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches

Hi Devang, I've tried the OPTBETA approach, and it now runs with and without my patch succesfully. I've found two problems, however: 1. The output of the nightly report does not include the figures from opt-beta by default. I've modified the TEST.nightly.report script to add two columns (OPT-BETA and LLC/OPT-BETA), but committing this change would mean that most users will be

One of the tools I use most frequently when coding is Google codesearch. Unfortunately, llvm.org's robots.txt appears to block all crawlers from indexing the llvm.org svn archive. This means that when you search for an LLVM-related symbol in code search, you get one of the many (possibly out-of-date) mirrors, rather than the up-to-date llvm.org version. This is sad. For more info, see the

Hi all, as you might have seen, I just did some restructuring on the testing documentation. Since the changes are only documentation and mostly text movement, I took the liberty of committing without posting a patch first. Was that appropriate?. The incentive for this commit was that I've spent the last week trying to get a grip on the test suite with moderate success. I think this

Dear Email user, Your email address samba@samba.org was harvested by a SPAM robot. It got your address from the webpage http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html For mor information about SPAM Robots and how you can protect yourself, Click Here http://www.email-cloak.com/default.asp?ID=396631&T=35429 Sincerely, Champ Mitchell Anti-Spam Services http://www.email-cloak.com

Hi, I have a one-to-many relationship. I want to be able to add objects to the collection w/out persisting them. How do I do this? The only thing I can''t think of is to use a transaction and roll it back. In other words - I want to do this: o = Order.find(1) p = Product.find(1) o.products << p # but don''t persist this I assume I''m just missing something

Pagination I am using an old tutorial which is tripping me right up as I have the latest version of rails installed. I''m persisting as I think I''m learning a little bit more about how RoR works. However after installing the scaffolding plug-in to fix an earlier problem I now have a problem with the pagination. I have followed this workaround:

> indexing the llvm.org svn archive. This means that when you search for an > LLVM-related symbol in code search, you get one of the many (possibly > out-of-date) mirrors, rather than the up-to-date llvm.org version. This is > sad. This is intentional. The workload of the server was pretty huge w/o this. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics,