similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM bindings, scope of llvm-c

On 2008-09-15, at 10:38, Christian Plessl wrote: > llvm-c could be extended to expose more details of the LLVM IR which > would allow more powerful program analysis and transformations. Yes. > But maybe this negates the design goals for llvm-c. No. > Is the functionality provided by llvm-c kept intentionally simple > for some reason? They are constrained only by

On 28.02.2011, at 15:44, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). >> >> I'm currently considering

I'm looking for methods for generating LLVM bitcode from binaries (binary translation). I found two projects that seem to be related: vmkit and llvm-qemu a) Could someone shed some light on how the recently released vmkit works? Can vmkit be used for statically translating JVM or MSIL code to LLVM bitcode? Or is vmkit simply reusing LLVM's JIT execution engine, without ever

On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > Hi everyone > > I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). > > I'm currently considering replacing and/or extending this compiler related lecture parts with an

Hi everyone I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). I'm currently considering replacing and/or extending this compiler related lecture parts with an introduction to LLVM as an example for a modern compiler framework, which we

On 29.09.2008, at 11:53, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > Watching this thread, it occurs to me that the "V" in "LLVM" is > creating > confusion. So far as I know, LLVM is the first project to use > "virtual" > to refer to the instruction set of the intermediate form. I understand > why this labeling made sense (sort of), but it was unfortunate. The

> From: OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> > There could just as easily be language bindings between C++ and > Python, he chose the C bindings probably just because they were > easier, but they are most certainly not required. I know that is the > case in a few other scripting languages as well. He ( I :-) ) chose llvm-c based on the thread starting here:

> Note that C bindings have been introduced since 2005, so there may be > a different route available than was taken then. Look in include/llvm- > c. The intent of the C bindings is to enable high-level language > bindings. The current focus is on enabling front-end compilers. Ocaml > and Haskell bindings have been developed atop them, the former being > in the LLVM source

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > 1) > Are the C bindings complete? That is, is there some part of the C++ API > that is not exposed by the C API? Nope, there's still a lot that's not done. Patches are always welcome :) We've got enough in subversion to implement the Kaleidoscope tutorial though. > 2) > Do

Hi Rob, on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem. Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't find it anywhere. We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW. We would be very glad if it is posible to get - Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max

Hi, I'm on a Ubuntu 18.04 server, trying to use django-haystack with xapian in a python3.6 virtualenv. The virtualenv is set up not to use system packages, meaning that I can't just install python3-xapian-haystack with apt, and instead have to manually build xapian-core and xapian-bindings within the virtualenv. This works with xapian-core and the --prefix argument to configure. When I

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello list, > > Since reading the kaleidoscope tutorial I have decided to play around with creating a language I've had in the back of my mind for some time.  I would prefer not to write the front end in c or c++ though if it can be avoided.  I read online that the ocaml bindings are

problem: I wish to implement samba on a solaris 8 with authentication from a win2k active directory server. I wish to have user dorectories mounted to AD server via samba and authenticated via AD. Anyone knows an easy/doable way to do this? -regards Rich

Hi, we are using Icecast with url authentication for some days now. This generally works quite well. But our web service that provides the authentication check sometimes gets requests with the following parameters: { "action":"stream_auth", "mount":"/stream", "ip":"xxxxx", "server":"xxxx.yyyy.de",

[To continue the conversation from https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/issues/5] > Currently there's no way for the Rust plugin to report an error. The > idiomatic way to do it would be for each callback to return a Result > object, much like how the Go plugin currently does it. I'm sure it's not idiomatic for Rust, but I just wanted to say that there is a way to return an

Hi Haifeng > I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried > to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert- > block-profiling", I got > error complaining " undefined reference to > `llvm_start_block_profiling'. > > I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory > but in the

Due to a current need to have a git mirror for LLVM, I'm resurrecting this old thread. I'm aware that there exist already LLVM git mirrors at git://repo.or.cz/llvm.git and git://github.com/earl/llvm-mirror.git However, these repositories only mirror the current SVN trunk and do no provide any branch and tag information, which would be very convenient for creating experimental branches

Hello, I have a somewhat complicated problem and so far I have not been able to find any hints that have brought me further towards a solution: I run a CIFS cluster with two nodes using ctdb and samba. This cluster is connected to an Active Directory. The share contains directories which belong to the user root and a certain group. The users who are to use the CIFS gateway are given access

Hi, all I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert-block-profiling", I got error complaining " undefined reference to `llvm_start_block_profiling'. I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory but in the Makefile, it said llvm gcc 4 and above

Hello list, Since reading the kaleidoscope tutorial I have decided to play around with creating a language I've had in the back of my mind for some time. I would prefer not to write the front end in c or c++ though if it can be avoided. I read online that the ocaml bindings are distributed with llvm but are not always as up to date as the c or c++ bindings. Is this (still) the case? Is