similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm on opensolaris

Hi, Chris > I see a couple for older versions of Solaris but nothing for OpenSolaris. > Do you happen to remember the PR number? Well, for example - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2516 I think Nathan can comment on solaris support status. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

2008/9/21 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>: > Hello, > >> If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another >> version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I >> can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just >> ask me what you need. > This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider

Hello, > If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another > version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I > can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just > ask me what you need. This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider using current svn top of tree, not 2.3 release. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

Hi, Oscar > at all, it would be great if you reflect your changes on the file list > inside the corresponding CMakeLists.txt when you add, remove or rename a > .cpp file. Isn't is possible for cmake just to glob everything in the corresponding directory? -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

Hello, Chuck > I've had a look at the stubs before and I think I'm circumventing them > in the example program since I populate the table and compile the > functions in the order so that things never need to be done lazily, but > I'll look further. Well, anyway stubs are definitely wrong from windows64 and this should be fixed, otherwise funny stuff can happen from time to

Hi, Chris > If the assembler is a limitation, the best solution would be to add a > direct PECOFF writer. There is a start of direct ELF and Macho writers > already in the tree. They are not production quality, but could be a > useful place to start looking. Well, maybe. But in any case I doubt there will be 'open' support for CV debug format :) -- WBR, Anton

hi folks, is there a straightforward or well-documented way to migrate my physical sxce snv_115 (x64) system into an xvm ? searching for "p2v" in an opensolaris context seems to pick up a few hits on zones, but nothing obvious relating to xvm on opensolaris for what it''s worth the host system is opensolaris (2010.02 snv_126), but i''m hoping that''s not very

Hello, Kevin > build process I described in my original message. So the difference is > more subtle; maybe a difference in the layout of structs or something. Also, there can be another ABI differences. > llvmoutput.c:17976: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of > 'longjmp' differ in signedness Hrm, are you using setjmp/longjmp stuff? They're definitely not

Hello, Kevin. > Well, I already use custom includes with these options: "-nostdlib > -nostdinc -Ipsptoolchain/psp/include > -Ipsptoolchain/lib/gcc/psp/4.1.0/include". But that seems not enough. > GCC has some target-specific behaviour compiled in? Well, in general - yes. However, I'm not sure up to which margin. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

Hello, Bill > This merge should go *much* more smoothly than the last merge -- it > could hardly be worse, right? ;-) I already did a test compile of > llvm-test with the patch and it compiled the programs without a > problem. Devang is currently testing it as well so that I have a > second opinion. One thing, which we already saw: please carefully check, that you won't

Hello, Oscar > Anyways, if there is no Mercurial or Bazaar mirrors available, I will > try git. Recommendations on which one to use welcomed. There is git mirror at repo.or.cz: http://repo.or.cz/w/llvm.git, llvm-gcc & clang mirrors are available there as well. I'm updating it 'by hands' currently due to some reasons, so sometimes it will need 2-3 days for changes in llvm

Hi, > (2) on alpha, gcc 4.2.4. The "unknown component name: alphacodegen" > didn't use to occur. My fault, I'll fix it. The problem is that lli wants to link in JIT module, which does not exist for these targets. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:05 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> libgcc is also available for windows. > Really? What license? What restrictions? Any speed impact over the > VC runtimes? Don't mix VC runtime and libgcc. These are totally different libraries for doing

Adrian Chadd wrote: > I can''t trigger this here with my Centos 5.3 domU. I have a feeling > this may be related to the hypervisor/dom0 environment. > > Not to say it isn''t a bug, it is just going to take me more time to > try and figure out. > > I''ll commit some more Xen tidyups to -current and build a new image > for you. It''ll still

Sorry if this was answered before. It''s hard to figure out what keywords to use in order to narrow the search. I''m looking into running Solaris 10 as a guest under an OpenSolaris dom0 host. Is this feasible, and if so, can someone point me to the best "howto" to reduce the frustration level? Otherwise, is there a better host OS to do this under? Thanks, Gary

I''m running OpenSolaris 2008.05 in VirtualBox on a Windows XP host. Playing around with various probes, I found that trying to load any probe associated with bdev_strategy dumps core. I can think of one or two likely and reasonable causes for this, but am assuming it''s undesirable behavior. Anyone know what''s happening here? -- This message posted from

Hello All, I have been banging my head against trying to get asterisk to compile on Solaris as well as OpenSolaris. I've tried to build various versions of Asterisk as on various versions of Solaris and OpenSolaris to no avail. Finally, I said, what the heck, I got the latest version of OpenSolaris that (pkg image-update) could get and then the latest ver of asterisk I found on the digium

I just installed opensolaris build 130 which i downloaded from genunix. The install went fine....and the first reboot after install seemed to work but when i powered down and rebooted fully, it locks up as soon as i log in. Gnome is still showing the icon it shows when stuff hasn''t finished loading....is there any way i can find out why it''s locking up and how to fix it?

Pardon in advance my n00b ignorance. (Yes I have googled a [i]lot[/i] before asking.) I am considering VirtualBoxing away one physical machine at home, and running WinXP as host (yes, as atrocious it may seem, explanation below [1]) and OpenSolaris guest as file server, with OpenSolaris (why?[2]) having raw access to all my SATA drives. (OSes on the IDE channel). This is for home use, as a media

The open solaris dtrace page (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/dtrace/) has a bad link to the DTrace Guide(http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/817-6223). This message posted from opensolaris.org