similar to: [LLVMdev] Newbie question on front-end and code compaction

On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Bernardo Elayda wrote: > I'm also interested in helping out with compaction(making code with > a small footprint). People pointed out recently on the list that -Os doesn't work so well. See the email from regehr at cs.utah.edu on Aug 20 on llvmdev. You should be able to work with him to get testcases, from there you just grind through them and

Hi! Bernardo, I'm really interested in using that one. Where I can download it from? Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:56:04 -0700 >From: "Bernardo Elayda" <belayda at gmail.com> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.3 available as a VMware appliance >To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > Hi! > > Would there be any interest

Hi! I'm glad that their is interest in the VMware install of LLVM 2.3. The appliance(compressed via 7zip) is over 800 MB in size. So, I can't send it out via email. I don't have the resources to host it. If someone can find an area that this appliance can live, I'd be willing to upload it os that everyone could use it. regards, Bernardo -------------- next part --------------

Hi! I'm trying to compile llvm 2.2 with gcc 4.3.0 on FC8. My compile is failing with the following error(s): error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >' If you've run into this, how did you get around this issue? thx in advance! -Bernardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi! I'm a new LLVM user. I want to start using the LLVM System v2.3. However, I don't want to spend all my time hunting, pecking, downgrading, and/or upgrading packages to get LLVM v2.3 running. I was wondering which Linux distrubutions(FC7, Ubuntu, NetBSD, etc) have required the least effort out of the box to start running LLVM v2.3. tia, Bernardo Elayda -------------- next part

Hello! I'm using llvm v2.1 on FC8. I'm having some trouble with the tutorial on adding JIT. I'm just trying to compile the following code: using namespace llvm; static ExecutionEngine *TheExecutionEngine; static Module *TheModule; int main(){ TheModule = new Module("my cool jit"); TheExecutionEngine = ExecutionEngine::create(TheModule); } I'm using the following

I want to run a R program, prog.R, interactively. My question is, is there a way I can start prog.R on the shell terminal when invoking R, instead of using source() inside R? TIA, Gang

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim at lge.com> wrote: > Compaction calls interfaces of driver page migration > instead of calling balloon migration directly. > > Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim at lge.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 1 + > mm/compaction.c | 9 +++++---- > mm/migrate.c | 21

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim at lge.com> wrote: > Compaction calls interfaces of driver page migration > instead of calling balloon migration directly. > > Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim at lge.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 1 + > mm/compaction.c | 9 +++++---- > mm/migrate.c | 21

I'm inlining a bunch of C++ code, and I'm ending up with a bunch of basic blocks like this: filter441.i: ; preds = %unwind432.i call void @_ZSt9terminatev( ) unreachable filter453.i: ; preds = %unwind444.i call void @_ZSt9terminatev( ) unreachable It seems like I should be safe to merge these, but I can't find a pass to do so. Going over the open projects page it looks

Hi Minchan, [auto build test ERROR on v4.5-rc7] [cannot apply to next-20160310] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Minchan-Kim/Support-non-lru-page-migration/20160311-153649 config: x86_64-nfsroot (attached as .config) reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build

Hi Minchan, [auto build test ERROR on v4.5-rc7] [cannot apply to next-20160310] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Minchan-Kim/Support-non-lru-page-migration/20160311-153649 config: x86_64-nfsroot (attached as .config) reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build

On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 14:22 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind > the media up into filings or melt it down in a furnace. I unscrew the casing, extract the disk platter(s), slide a very strong magnet over both sides of the platter surface then bend the platter in half. How secure is that ? I can't afford a machine that

> On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: >> >> VMware balloon enhancements: adding support for memory compaction, >> memory shrinker (to prevent OOM) and splitting of refused pages to >> prevent recurring inflations. >> >> Patches

> On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: >> >> VMware balloon enhancements: adding support for memory compaction, >> memory shrinker (to prevent OOM) and splitting of refused pages to >> prevent recurring inflations. >> >> Patches

Hi All, I am using DNAcopy package in R for copy number analysis of 500K chip. The final output which I get from DNA copy is too big to be printed in a file. So I am getting an error as "reached getOption("max.print") -- omitted 475569 rows " Can somebody please provide me the pointers with how to increase the limit for max.print . Thanks, Pooja DISCLAIMER\

Hello, I'm an MD working in an eye clinic. I'm learning by myself to use R for use in my research works and for implementation in a software project. There are some authors who recomends the use of Cox regression as a substitute for Logistic regression (<a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/21.pdf"> Barros AJD, Hirakata VN. BMCMedical Research Methodology, 2003;

> On May 17, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 05:10:23PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: >>> On May 3, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Nadav Amit <namit at vmware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>

Hi R-Masters I need use a sequential approach in serie of cases, but may data is not normal. If data is normal distribution is very easy create analysis using likelihood ratio like of Wald test. But in my case I need use a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney). I was use: RSiteSearch("sequential rank test") but not solve my problem. Do you know routine or package implement

Hi R-masters I need help to make modified cumulative hazard ratio plot. I need create a common plot but with the number of subjects in risk each ticks times for two different groups in bottom of plot (I put one example in attach). Do you know a routine for this? Is possible create a routine for this? In this case with how commands? Thanks in advance! -- Bernardo Rangel Tura, M.D,MPH,Ph.D