similar to: [LLVMdev] New llvm-gcc bootstrap failure

Hello, Everyone. I'm currently trying to bootstrap llvm-gcc4 on mingw32 platform. Everything (except some small fixes) seems to be fine: stage1 finished successfully. I'm linking with debug variant of LLVM, since linker bug prevents release builds. Unfortunately, stage2 failes immediately with this cryptic message: $/f/tmp/llvm/gccbuild/gcc/xgcc -B/f/tmp/llvm/gccbuild/gcc/

Hello, David > Anton, any luck with this? I'm wondering if it's a glitch on my end or if > it's something I should dive into deeper and attempt to debug. Bootstrap for me is broken due to different files produced at stage2 and stage3, but I didn't see such crash. In any way, I consider x86-64-bit targets to be broken, since all my 'usual' tests are currently

Duncan Sands dixit: >Can you bootstrap llvm-gcc (configure with --enable-bootstrap)? Nope, probably because it uses the host C++ compiler instead of the one built in stage1 during stage2: /usr/ports/lang/llvm-gcc/w-llvm-gcc4.2-58935-1/llvm-gcc4.2/host-i386-ecce-mirbsd10/prev-gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ports/lang/llvm-gcc/w-llvm-gcc4.2-58935-1/llvm-gcc4.2/host-i386-ecce-mirbsd10/prev-gcc/

I never thought I'd say this, but I think it's easier to do this with GRUB 2. Anyway I did an installation to raid1's in CentOS 6's installer, which still uses GRUB legacy. I tested removing each of the two devices and it still boots. These are the commands in its log: : Running... ['/sbin/grub-install', '--just-copy'] : Running... ['/sbin/grub',

Hello guys, On cygwin-1.7, I can build and test clang successfully by 3-stage. Known issues: - binaries among stage2 and stage3 do not match. (other than timestamp and checksum) investigating. - I met some warnings. I have fixes for them. - [llvm] r127241 - [llvm] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110307/117725.html - [clang] r127283 - [clang]

On 8/6/2015 4:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: >> On 8/6/2015 4:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that >>>>

doing that grub-install /dev/sda will give me the "corresponding BIOS device" error. But now I fixed it by doing a manual grub install. first boot with cd1 and type linux rescue at the prompt when you're at the linux prompt after detecting and mounting the partitions, do a "chroot /mnt/sysimage" then # grub --batch #grub> root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs,

2008/7/23 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>: > My nightly tester on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed > to bootstrap llvm-gcc today: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > Bootstrap comparison failure! > ./build/read-rtl.o differs I am having the same problem. It was "introduced" by revision 54811, so it looks like a memory corruption problem. Investigating. > The

Hi all! Doing some tests with CentOS 5.5 on a KVM virtual machine, after doing the installation, I added a second disk. But when trying to boot from it, I get the following error: --------------------------------------------------------------------- root (hd1,0) Error 21: Selected disk does not exist --------------------------------------------------------------------- The two disks are

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! Doing some tests with CentOS 5.5 on a KVM virtual machine, after doing the installation, I added a second disk. But when trying to boot from it, I get the following error: - --------------------------------------------------------------------- root (hd1,0) Error 21: Selected disk does not exist -

Folks, I am using a two-stagesimple build like this one: make -G Ninja -DCLANG_ENABLE_BOOTSTRAP=ON ../src ninja stage2-check-all Stage 1 gets built, and when looking at rules.ninja in the stage2-bins I see: rule CXX_COMPILER_AnalysisTests depfile = $DEP_FILE deps = gcc command = <stage1 build dir>./bin/clang++ $DEFINES $INCLUDES $FLAGS -MMD -MT $out -MF $DEP_FILE -o $out -c $in

I solved the problem in one more (and more elegant) way. So here's the program again. Where does R stand on the Anderson-Goodman test of 1957? I hunted around and nobody seems to be doing this in R. Is it that there has been much progress after 1957 and nobody uses it anymore? # Problem statement: # # You are holding a dataset where firms are observed for a fixed # (and small) set of years.

The new cmake 3.7.0-rc1 release produces a stage2 bootstrap failure in openmp project build on OS X 10.11 under Xcode 8.... In file included from /sw/src/fink.build/llvm40-4.0.0-1/llvm-4.0.0.src/projects/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_alloc.c:16: In file included from /sw/src/fink.build/llvm40-4.0.0-1/llvm-4.0.0.src/projects/openmp/runtime/src/kmp.h:98:

Dear All, I have a K8S-MX Asus Athlon 64 Motherboard with a 754 pin 3000+ CPU, which I cam trying to install 4.1 Centos 64 bit. The problem seems to arise when installing onto Mirrored disks, I have noticed that from Centos 4 onwards it tries to rebuild the arrays as it installs which slows the whole process right down across all platforms I have tried it on. In addition, the install

Since we are only a week away from branching for 3.7.0, this new breakage in the stage2 bootstrap of llvm/clang/compiler-rt/clang-tools-extra should get triaged. At r241513, a three stage bootstrap with comparision of stage2/stage3 files completed fine. However at r241594 we now have the new regression reported in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24054... Assertion failed: (Val &&

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > >> On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: >> >>> >>> [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), >>> and it works for me (tm). This

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > >> >> [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), >> and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI pieces, >> rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] >> > libc++

hi! raid 1 arrays: I already have 2 systems running this same raid1 config. 1 sys has 2 120 gb 1 sys has 1 120gb and 1 200gb but matching the raid partitions this system here that is giving me fits right now has 1 250gb and 1 200gb. I tried it w/a new 250 gb for the 2nd drive but the same results. Will not boot. in druid, when I am config. the raid arrays, I always create the boot partitions

I'm getting the following when building llvm-gcc with an optimized set of LLVM libraries: /ptmp/dag/build.llvm-gcc-4.2.trunk.official.opt/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/./gcc/xgcc -B/ptmp/dag/build.llvm-gcc-4.2.trunk.official.opt/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/./gcc/ -B/cray/iss/compiler/cost/tools/llvm-tools/llvm/install.trunk.official.opt/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/

Hello, I have two disks sda and sdb. One of the was broken so I have changed the broken disk with a working one. I started the server in rescue mode, and created the partional table, and added all the partitions to the software raid. *I have added the partitions to the RAID, and reboot.* # mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sdb1 # mdadm /dev/md1 --add /dev/sdb2 # mdadm /dev/md2 --add /dev/sdb3 # mdadm