similar to: [LLVMdev] Conditonal to constant promotion?

Hi, I have problem with my R program. Actually, it just a simple program, but I do not know the error is. Here is part of my program: .... if (tau2ca==0) {MVvc <- 0.01} else {MVvc <- tau2ca} ri_vc <- si2/MVvc vi_vc <- ri_vc + 1 Y_bar_vc <- sum(y/vi_vc)/sum((1/vi_vc)) tau2MVvc <- sum((1/vi_vc)*(y - Y_bar_vc)^2)/(k-1) .... But then, there is an error displayed in workspace

Suppose I have data such as tmp <- data.frame(score = c(1,2,3,4, 4,3,2,1), trial = gl(2,4), Gender = gl(2,2,8, labels=c('M', 'F'))) Now I would like to compute a rank on the variable score conditional on trial and gender. I could do res <- with(tmp, tapply(score, list(Gender, trial), rank)) res[,1] res[,2] and then finagle a way to create a new variable in the dataframe

Dear R helpers, I have a dataframe (test1) containing the time of sunrise and sunset for each day of the year for 3 years. I have another dataframe (test2) containing measurements that are taken every 15 minutes, 24/7. I would like to extract all rows from test2 that occur between sunrise and sunset for the appropriate date. Can you suggest a good vectorized way to do this? Keep in mind

On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at grame.fr> wrote: > > Le 5 juil. 2013 à 04:11, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : > >> On 07/04/2013 01:39 PM, Stéphane Letz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Our DSL can generate C or directly generate LLVM IR. With LLVM 3.3, we can vectorize the C produced code using clang with -O3, or

Le 5 juil. 2013 à 17:23, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> a écrit : > > On Jul 5, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz at grame.fr> wrote: > >> >> Le 5 juil. 2013 à 04:11, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : >> >>> On 07/04/2013 01:39 PM, Stéphane Letz wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>>

Hi all, I'm pretty new to the community, but I've run into a number of questions while building a backend for a custom target. I'll keep it to one topic per thread, though. My target has arithmetic instructions (add, sub, etc...) which all set the flags register. There is no explicit comparison instruction for my target. The conditional branching instructions check the flags

Hi all, I'm pretty new to the community, but I've run into a number of questions while building a backend for a custom target. I'll keep it to one topic per thread, though. My target has arithmetic instructions (add, sub, etc...) which all set the flags register. There is no explicit comparison instruction for my target. The conditional branching instructions check the flags

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in warning message text Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> There is a spelling mistake in a warning message. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c

Le 5 juil. 2013 à 04:11, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : > On 07/04/2013 01:39 PM, Stéphane Letz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Our DSL can generate C or directly generate LLVM IR. With LLVM 3.3, we can vectorize the C produced code using clang with -O3, or clang with -O1 then opt -O3 -vectorize-loops. But the same program generating LLVM IR version cannot be

Hello everyone, please I need your help. To reproduce my problem I created simple pass for backends (TestPass.cpp in attached files). That pass I call from Mips backend in this way (MipsTargetMachine.cpp): bool MipsPassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() { addPass(createTestPass()); return false; } The problem becomes, when I am trying compile file ldtoa.ll (in attached files). Compiling

Hi, How can I grab all parents in a table, depending on a condition in the children table ? Fx. def list @projects = Project.find(:all) end will find all projects in my table. Now let''s say I want show a similar list, for all open projects.. I define an open project, as all lines (Line has belongs_to :Project) that do not yet have a closed_at timestamp set. So basically, I want

Hi, I'm trying to write up my little m68k backend things have been going smoothly. I've been working with the x86 backend as a template, fixing things as I go. Now I've run into branches and I have a crash I don't really understand. Here's the sample IR I'm running llc on to generate assembly: define i32 @ilog2(i32 %x) { entry: %tmp718 = icmp eq i32 %x, 0

I would like to be able to instrument va_arg, but when I generate a bc file for a test case using: llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm vararg.c -c -o vararg.bc I do not see va_arg. Instead, it seems the args are accessed through %struct.__va_list_tag, which makes things a bit trickier to instrument. Is there a way to force llvm-gcc to use va_arg? Perhaps there is some documentation about va_list_tag or

Hi, I am trying to extract the name of the variables passed as an Argument to a Function. I am using a runOnFunction Pass. For example in the following IR respresentation, define void @foo(i32 %limit) { entry: -- -- } I should be able to walk the IR and get '%limit' as the external variable passed to the function. Another question, Is it possible to create a basic symbol table (

I want to do the following: suppose the program structure: bb / \ bb1 bb2 \ / bb3

The following C code : #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int TESTE2( int parami , int paraml ,double paramd ) { int varx=0,vary; int nI =0; //varx= parami; if( parami > 0 ) { varx = parami; vary = varx + 1; } else { varx = vary + 1; vary = paraml; } varx = varx + parami + paraml; for( nI = 1 ; nI <= paraml; nI++) { varx =

Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like PDT.getRootNode() returns NULL for: > > define fastcc void @c974001__lengthy_calculation. > 1736(%struct.FRAME.c974001* nocapture %CHAIN.185) noreturn { > entry: > br label %bb > > bb: > br label %bb > } > > > Isn't it a bug in PostDominatorTree? > > Please note that this crashes: >

instcombine doesn't seem to be doing it. From my testing it seems to only occur when I use -indvars after a long string of commands. For example: llvm-as < test_fc_27.ll | opt -preverify -domtree -verify -lowersetjmp -raiseallocs -simplifycfg -domtree -domfrontier -mem2reg -globalopt -globaldce -ipconstprop -deadargelim -instcombine -simplifycfg -ba siccg -prune-eh -inline

Hello, Bug is already fixed by Chris (see: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4915) . I added getRootNode() == NULL condition to my patch. It's not a great solution, but it is enough for now I think. New patch attached. -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dse_ssu-2.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 17762 bytes Desc: not