similar to: [LLVMdev] Check out my Facebook profile

On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Andy Kitchen wrote: FYI, all posts to llvmdev are moderated until the person posts something sensible. This is a PITA for me (llvm mailing lists get dozens of spams a day which require moderation), but is generally very effective. Since Andy had already posted something sensible, he was on the whitelist. However, he just lost the ability to post to llvmdev

I'm trying to install llvm on my windows development box and hit a problem I'm using cygwin cygwin% gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) I downloaded both the top of tree via svn I ran ./configure make make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/llvm/lib/Support' llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Debug build llvm[1]: Compiling APInt.cpp

Rubin, Norman wrote: > I'm trying to install llvm on my windows development box and hit a > problem > I'm using cygwin > cygwin% gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) > > I downloaded both the top of tree via svn > I ran ./configure > make > > make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/llvm/lib/Support' >

I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of LLVM 2.3. I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location: C:\cygwin\home\czhao\ResearchTools\LLVM\2.3\obj2.3>make make[1]: Entering directory

Hello, I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it. I'm working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the -mno-cygwin option to get a Mingw-like behavior)? The LLVM source tree is from the current SVN trunk. Compilation

I needed these for some work I'm doing in clang... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: set.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1925 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090211/82192816/attachment.obj>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote: > I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 > and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of > LLVM 2.3. > I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 > and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they all fail at the same location: > >

Function.cpp:167: error: call of overloaded `AddInteger(uint32_t&)' is ambiguous /home/Seb/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h:151: note: candidates are: void llv m::FoldingSetImpl::NodeID::AddInteger(int) /home/Seb/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h:152: note: void llvm::FoldingSetIm pl::NodeID::AddInteger(unsigned int) /home/Seb/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h:153: note: void

LLVM currently has a bunch of different hashing algorithms scattered throughout the code base. There's also a number of places in the code where a FoldingSetNodeID is created for the purpose of calculating a hash, and then discarded. From an efficiency standpoint, this isn't all that bad unless the number of individual items being hashed > 32, at which point the SmallVector overflows

I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being rather slow. It's accounting for the vast majority of my full compilation time.  I'm trying to figure out why this is happening, since it's becoming an impediment.  (Note: by slow I mean about 3s of time for only about 2K of my front-end code, 65K lines of LLVM-IR) Using valgrind I see some functions which seem

By the way, the reason I'm bringing this up is that a number of folks are currently working on optimizing the use of hash tables within LLVM's code base, and unless we can come up with a common hashing facility, there will be an increasing proliferation of cut & paste copies of hash functions. So feedback would be nice. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Talin <viridia at

Here's my latest version of Hashing.h, which I propose to add to llvm/ADT. Comments welcome and encouraged. On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, the reason I'm bringing this up is that a number of folks are > currently working on optimizing the use of hash tables within LLVM's code > base, and unless we can come up with a

Jeffrey and I are working on future standard library functionality for hashing user defined types: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3333.html I would much rather have an interface that is close to or mirrors this one. We already have some field experience with it, and using it in LLVM and Clang would provide more. Also, it would be possible to essentially share code

On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Gregory Petrosyan wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:51:15PM -0800, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> While I've not reviewed the patch in too much detail, it looks >> promising. Can you run some end-to-end benchmarks to make sure that >> cache pressure in the full program or other variables not accounted >> for in a micro-benchmark don't

On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:51:15PM -0800, Chandler Carruth wrote: > While I've not reviewed the patch in too much detail, it looks > promising. Can you run some end-to-end benchmarks to make sure that > cache pressure in the full program or other variables not accounted > for in a micro-benchmark don't dominate performance? Specifically the > nightly tester includes a number

Hi, Could you share how you compile IR and which version of JIT you use (Orc, MCJIT)? Could it be that you are using interpreter instead of actual JIT? Cheers, Alex. > On 5. May 2018, at 08:04, edA-qa mort-ora-y via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being > rather slow. It's accounting for

In any case, it seems that GCC 3.4.4 may be in hot water even if you did get it to compile: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc -- Christopher Lamb On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Alain Frisch wrote: > Hello, > > I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it. > I'm > working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin: > >

Hi everyone, TL;DR: With current pending patches applied in compiler-rt and llvm, and trunk clang, you can build your application with XRay tracing enabled on Linux with tracing enabled before main starts, and logging stops when the main thread exits. Just a quick update, I have some patches under review that when applied cleanly to LLVM and compiler-rt allows for building applications with XRay

Julien Lerouge wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Chuck Zhao wrote: > >> I used to be able to build LLVM (from source) under Cygwin for llvm-2.2 >> and previous releases, but can't continue the trend since the release of >> LLVM 2.3. >> I have tried a wide variety of gcc compilers (gcc 3.4.4, 4.1.2, 4.2.4 >> and 4.3.2) on cygwin, they

Hello, Alain. > I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it. > I'm > working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin: Oh, this seems to be killer mix :) GCC (at least native mingw32 port) has known problems being running on Vista. > Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the > -mno-cygwin option to get a