similar to: [LLVMdev] A case where llvm created different cfg for same code

Hi, The following two segments of code are actually the same, but llvm created different cfg for them. Form1: 1 #define N 10 2 int test(int A[N][N]) 3 { 4 int i, j; 5 int result =0; 6 for(j=0; j+2<N; ++j) { 7 //for(i=0; i<j && i+j+1<N; i++) { 8 for(i=0; i<j && i<N-j-1; i++) { 9 A[i+j+1][j] = A[j + 2][j-i] + i; 10 } 11 } 12 13 for (i=0; i<N-2; ++i) 14 for (j=0;

> > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:23:52 -0700 > From: "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] A case where llvm created different cfg for > same code > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: > <16e5fdf90808121323g1ae2a2e3lb6c5bd62521df621 at mail.gmail.com> >

Is there a way to apply paste to?list(form1 = EQ1, form2 = EQ2, form3 = EQ3, form4 = EQ4)?such that I don't have to write form1=EQ1 for all my models?(I might have a list of 20 or more)? I also need the EQs to read the formulas associated with them. For example, below, I was able to automate the name assignment but I could not figure out how to?to set up the list using?paste or other

Hello, it is really nice to be here with the wonderful Wine community. Modal window gets out of focus if minimized and blocks any actions in the main window. I've attached and example created in Delphi called Project1. It has Form1 window with action button which opens a modal dialog called Form2. The main idea is when opened Form2 to be always on top and to be impossible to hide it behind

Each of the data sets contains monthly observations on price indices for 7 countries. I use the fitted values from reg1 in the reg2 model. The interior loop executes without error as long as I explicitly specify the data set, i.e. data=dat70. However the code fails to execute if I specify the model in the form of the commented line, i. e reg1 <-dynlm(form1,data=Dnames[j]) I get the following

Dear List Members,I am trying to set up a large system of equations and I am trying to find a simple way to set up the list command under the package system fit. Here is the example from system fit and what I am trying to do: EQ1 <- Y1 ~ X1 + X2 + X4EQ2 <- Y2 ~ X2 + X3EQ3 <- Y3 ~ X2 + X3 + X4EQ4 <- Y4 ~ X1 + X3 + X4eqSystem <-list(form1 = EQ1, form2 = EQ2, form3 = EQ3, form4 = EQ4)

Hello, I've written a small function that's supposed to save me some time, and it's ending up killing it- the intention is to iteratively subset a dataset fram on framevec, fit a model (either lm or nls depending on type) and return the r2 or AIC from the model, respectively. Although as far as I can tell in my code the plots are dependent on the fit of the model to the data and the

Hello, I'm testing a simple delphi application that have 3 forms. >From FORM1 (the main form) I press a button to show FORM2, then from FORM2 I press a button to show FORM3, when I close FORM3, FORM1 becomes focused instead of FORM2. Every time you close a form or a dialog the application main form becomes the active one. This only happend in KDE, allowing windows manager to control the

Here is a function I wrote. It runs no problem, but generate empty pdf files. I can't find what is the problem. create.pdf<- function(x, dir) { dir.create(dir, showWarnings = FALSE) plist<- c("a", "b" , "c", "d") for(j in plist) { filedir<- paste(dir, "/", j, ".pdf",

Whoops, forgot to CC: the list. > >----- Forwarded Message ---- >From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> >To: Sheng Zhou <zhousheng00 at gmail.com> >Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 9:26:51 PM >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc not compatible with gcc on a small case? > > >Hi Sheng Zhou, > > >It shouldn't compile. You have the method declared

Hi: When should we use "unnumbered priorities"(n) in extensions.What is the different between these 2 forms of extensions.conf? and ,Are both true? extensions.conf: form1: [Conferencerooms] exten => 333,1,Answer exten => 333,n,meetme(8000|cim) exten => 333,n,playback(vm-goodbye) exten => 333,n,hangup form2: [Conferencerooms] exten => 333,1,Answer exten =>

I''ve been playing with some ideas in getting the server-side Rails code and client-side AJAX stuff working nicely together while still providing fallback for non-js viewers. I''m using Behaviour + prototype. I was experimenting with using an object literal to define forms that would be inserted into appropriate divs. Why not just write the forms on the server side and unhide

Hi, I have a simple C case as following: int test(int x, int y) { return -x / -y; } With llvm-gcc -O1, I got: define i32 @test(i32 %x, i32 %y) nounwind { entry: sub i32 0, %x ; <i32>:0 [#uses=1] sub i32 0, %y ; <i32>:1 [#uses=1] sdiv i32 %0, %1 ; <i32>:2 [#uses=1] ret i32 %2 } With llvm-gcc -O2, I got: define i32 @test(i32 %x, i32 %y) nounwind { entry: sdiv i32

I want to use helpers inside a controller method for an AJAX application. After the page is loaded and displayed, there will be an asynchronous javascript request to load additional resources such as html forms and other data. The controller which handles the request will collect the resources and send them back in json format. def get_resources data=Hash.new data[:form1]=form_helper1()

i have a 2 step form which contains 1 file_column field. The second form is just "This is how your post will look" kind of form and the user can click Edit (to take them back to form1) or Submit. If the user clicks edit it takes them back to the first form with fields populated. I have it working with all text fields, I just dont know how to do this with file_column field (showing the

Greetings R Users, I have a system of equations for which I would like to output all the R-squares. Assume there are four equations in my system, the only way I found to output all the R-squares is by calling them out one by one as this: summary(fitSUR$eq[[1]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[2]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[3]])$r.squared summary(fitSUR$eq[[4]])$r.squared But isn't there a

I have a situation where I have several different methods that put up forms for the user that all update various parts of the same model. They could all go through the same "update" method, with a structure at the end like: if at-variable.update_attributes(parms) flash - it worked else render action => "The form that got us here" end however, its

All, Please welcome Zhou Sheng <zhousheng00 at gmail.com> to the LLVM development community. Sheng is from Beijing and is a Masters student at the University there. Sheng and I will be working together on some significant changes to LLVM in the coming months. Our first task is to implement integer types without signs in LLVM. You can read Chris Lattner's notes on this change at this

I found a case which gcc can compile while llvm-gcc can not. I'm using the gcc4.1 and the most recent llvm-gcc. Here is the case: template <int N> class T { public: int V; }; T<4> test(T<4> a[4][8]) { return a[3][3]; } llvm-gcc dumped: fail.cpp: In function \u2018T<4> test(T<4> (*)[8])\u2019: fail.cpp:7: error: invalid use of incomplete type

instcombine doesn't seem to be doing it. From my testing it seems to only occur when I use -indvars after a long string of commands. For example: llvm-as < test_fc_27.ll | opt -preverify -domtree -verify -lowersetjmp -raiseallocs -simplifycfg -domtree -domfrontier -mem2reg -globalopt -globaldce -ipconstprop -deadargelim -instcombine -simplifycfg -ba siccg -prune-eh -inline