similar to: [LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?"

2008 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Stuart Hastings wrote: >> David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes: >> >> >>>> For my test suite I use Tcl (with TclX, no Expect). It watches >>>> stdout >>>> and stderr, gets exit codes and has a timer for killing hanged >>>> processes. Process control works the same on Windows and Unix and >>>> takes
2008 Aug 04
3
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes: >> For my test suite I use Tcl (with TclX, no Expect). It watches stdout >> and stderr, gets exit codes and has a timer for killing hanged >> processes. Process control works the same on Windows and Unix and takes >> a less than 30 lines of code. >> >> What else do you need? > > A way to examine asm output and
2008 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
On Monday 04 August 2008 16:59, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes: > >> For my test suite I use Tcl (with TclX, no Expect). It watches stdout > >> and stderr, gets exit codes and has a timer for killing hanged > >> processes. Process control works the same on Windows and Unix and takes > >> a less than 30 lines of code. >
2008 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
On Friday 01 August 2008 00:22, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > >>> I've been thinking of constructing a mirror test suite coordinated > >>> using shell scripts (bash) > >> > >> Please no, pick a real language. I love bash and it is fine for any > >> 200 line or less program, but for much beyond
2008 Aug 01
4
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: >>> I've been thinking of constructing a mirror test suite coordinated >>> using shell scripts (bash) >> >> Please no, pick a real language. I love bash and it is fine for any >> 200 line or less program, but for much beyond that, something else. >> Python?c? C++? >> > If I thought
2013 Jan 12
3
Cannot find Tcl library(Sort of OT)
Hey All, I'm trying to build Tux Racer. I get: checking for tcl8.5 library... no checking for tcl83 library... no checking for tcl8.2 library... no checking for tcl82 library... no checking for tcl8.0 library... no checking for tcl80 library... no checking for tcl library... no configure: error: Cannot find Tcl library The install manual says I may have to pass some options to configure:
2008 Aug 08
2
Tcl\tk not supported on this system
In trying to install the pbatR package, I was greeted with the error Error: package 'tcltk' does not have a name space Execution halted Directly installing the package tcltk2 returned the following error: Loading required package: tcltk Error in firstlib(which.lib.loc, package) : Tcl/Tk support is not available on this system I have seen from previous posts that tcl/tk must be
2008 Aug 06
4
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > I'm indulging in this exercise to enable testing a native MingW32 build > of LLVM in Windows. If LLVM's DejaGNU usage is the same as GCC's, I'll google or ask on the MinGW mailing list how MinGW testers run the GCC testsuite, before trying to fix something that maybe is not broken. > There are more portability
2008 Aug 04
1
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes: > No problem with Perl either, or Python. Tcl is much less well-known. > > Note that I don't particularly like any of these languages but I'm trying > not to let personal preference get in the way. :) Neither I do. This sub-thread started with a discussion about the feasibility of leaving behing DejaGNU and using `bash'
2008 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Mike Stump wrote: > On Jul 30, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> wrote: > >> I've been thinking of constructing a mirror test suite coordinated >> using >> shell scripts (bash) >> > > Please no, pick a real language. I love bash and it is fine for any > 200 line or less program, but for much beyond that, something
2008 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
On Jul 30, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> wrote: > I've been thinking of constructing a mirror test suite coordinated > using > shell scripts (bash) Please no, pick a real language. I love bash and it is fine for any 200 line or less program, but for much beyond that, something else. Python?c? C++?
2008 Feb 25
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2008 Feb 22
0
CESA-2008:0134 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) tcltk - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0134 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0134.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/expect-5.38.0-92.8.c3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/expect-devel-5.38.0-92.8.c3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/expectk-5.38.0-92.8.c3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/itcl-3.2-92.8.c3.s390.rpm
2008 Feb 24
0
CESA-2008:0134 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 tcltk - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0134 tcltk security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0134.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/expect-5.38.0-92.8.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/expect-devel-5.38.0-92.8.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/itcl-3.2-92.8.x86_64.rpm
2005 May 29
6
R GUI for Linux?
Hello all, I noticed that both Windows and OS X version of R have a GUI (Rconsole). Is there a GUI for Linux? I'm running Debian on which the CLI for R works just fine. Regards, - Robert
2005 Aug 22
1
An lgrind definition for the S language
I seem to recall discussion of an language definition file for S for use with the lgrind utility but I can't find any trace of it in an R Site Search. The lgrind utility takes a file of code in a particular programming language and prepares it for "pretty printing" in LaTeX. In my version the available language definitions are $ lgrind -s When specifying a language case is
2008 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Jonathan Brumley wrote: > > 2 more roadblocks for Visual Studio users are the inability to compile > gcc and the inability to compile and run the test suite. I would not > want to submit a change unless I could still compile/run gcc and pass > the test suite. (Testing before submission is the way we do it where > I come from - I am assuming it's the same here). >
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > The LLVM test suite requires expect as a dependency of DejaGNU. The > stock source of expect requires a *NIX fork, so it's relatively > difficult to build under MinGW even though Tk/Tcl is easy to build > under MinGW. (I'm not aware of a precompiled MinGW binary for expect, > although it might be in one of the more
2008 Feb 23
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 36, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2008 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > > >> I'm indulging in this exercise to enable testing a native MingW32 build >> of LLVM in Windows. >> > > If LLVM's DejaGNU usage is the same as GCC's, I'll google or ask on the > MinGW mailing list how MinGW testers run the GCC testsuite, before > trying to