similar to: [LLVMdev] SPARC front-end

Henrik Bach wrote: > > You should download and install in the first shot: > > a.. LLVM source code (3.5M) > f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) > > Then follow the items listed in > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html for Cygwin. > [snip] <QUOTE from http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html#cygwin> It has been found that the GCC

Might anyone have a FreeBSD binary or suggested modifications to the source to compile one? Thanks, Sean

Hi, This minor patch clarify matters in the CFEBuildInstrs.html file in my view. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html have lines: Add the directory containing the tools to your PATH. % set path = ( `cd llvm/tools/Debug && pwd` $path ) In my LLVM object directory at LLVM build (obj != src) obj/tools/Debug don't exist (instead exist obj/Debug) Also i recheck obj == src case with same result. I am use and I think command must be updated to set path =

You should download and install in the first shot: a.. LLVM source code (3.5M) f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) Then follow the items listed in http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html for Cygwin. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com

Alex Vinokur wrote: >Henrik Bach wrote: > > >>You should download and install in the first shot: >> >> a.. LLVM source code (3.5M) >> f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) >> >>Then follow the items listed in >>http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html for Cygwin. >> >> >> >[snip] > ><QUOTE from

Hi! Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. I've tried downloading the sources and building according to http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html (except I'm not an elite gcc hacker). I tried following the guidelines and got what looks like a gcc for x86 with no traces of LLVM. I tried passing --enable-llvm with various llvm root pathnames and got ICEs.

"John Criswell" <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote in message news:4162A940.8090307 at cs.uiuc.edu... > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > >

Hi all, I'm using samba 2.2.8a and trying to set it up as pdc using ldapsam with a big help from idealx. I have a test pdc working almost the same except it doesn't have acl support and it's using 2.2.6. But I haven't configured acl yet on the new system. Both seem to have the same entries in ldap (even encrypted passwords for root are the same) but when I to logon with root to

Hi Reid, > 1. Make sure your path now includes <builddir>/Debug/bin instead of > <builddir>/tools/Debug. This changed a little while back. Interesting. I don't have llvm/Debug/ after building "tools-only". Is that a symlink? Do symlinks work under cygwin? (I run xp and both of my partitions are ntfs) > If those don't clear the problem, please tell me

Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html have lines: > > Add the directory containing the tools to your PATH. > % set path = ( `cd llvm/tools/Debug && pwd` $path ) > > In my LLVM object directory at LLVM build (obj != src) > obj/tools/Debug don't exist (instead exist obj/Debug) > > Also i recheck obj == src case with same

I just downloaded the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. (2) If I need llvm gcc, will the binary version suffice, or do I need to compile the CVS version? (3) If I need its source

Sean Peisert wrote: > John, > > I may be missing something here, but if I the compilation docs, I need > to build LLVM first and the C frontend second. But doing this, I > get: > > **llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ was not found, > > (obviously -- it wasn't installed, right?) You do need to build LLVM first before building llvm-gcc. This may seem a bit weird, but

Hi, Today I've succeded in compiling the llvm-tools, llvm-gcc and stacker frontend and in installing it. Uptill now I've followed the steps given in: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html with modifications for the mingw platform. I'll return with step-by-step instructions how to do it on this platform. Cheers Henrik :)

I am trying to compile the cfrontend for gcc3, not gcc4. I did ./configure --prefix=/opt/llvmgcc --enable-languages=c,c++ After adding the --enable-languages flag I get "xgcc: installation problem, cannot exec `gccas': No such file or directory" It is true, I don't have gccas in my PATH, nor does the file gccas appear in my cfrontend directory. Is my configuration wrong, yet

Am Montag, 8. August 2005 04:15 schrieb Chris Lattner: > > I have never seen this, and don't really have any ideas. What configure > options did you use? Did you follow the directions here? > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html > Yes I followed those instructions - almost. This is my configure line: ../src/configure --prefix=/usr --disable-threads

Alex Vinokur wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. > > > My environment: > ----------------- > Windows 2000 > Cygwin > $ uname -srom > CYGWIN_NT-5.0

Hi all, I am trying to build a cross compiler for Sparc on x386 host. I tried to run configure with configure --enable-targets=sparc or with configure --target=sparc but in both cases I got llvm compiler for x86 target. Is there a way to build a cross compiler for Sparc (or ARM)? Thanks. -- Fima Rabin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:50:35AM -0400, Bill Wendling wrote: > It didn't look like there was a cftonend binary for the IA-64 > platform. Are we supposed to use the x86 binaries instead? The answer to that is that we don't have IA-64 in-house, so we don't provide an IA-64 C/C++ front-end, but if someone were to contribute it to us, we would gratefully host it. Note that if you

Sorry, I forgot to give all you guys my credit, too. Without your help - especially from Jeff, Morten, Reid and Chris, to name a few, this wouldn't have succeded. Just for fun, I ran from a windows command prompt the fibinacci.exe with the argument of 10 and it returned 55. All in all, something lives. Great! :) >From: "Henrik Bach" Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:26:02 +0100