similar to: [LLVMdev] customized output of double load/store on ppc32

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] customized output of double load/store on ppc32"

2008 Jul 23
0
[LLVMdev] customized output of double load/store on ppc32
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter > that I would like to be able to run on both little- and big-endian > platforms. The split stw's mean that i32s of the f64 are swapped in > memory on little-endian (thus foiling native-code interop).
2008 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] customized output of double load/store on ppc32
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: >> I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter >> that I would like to be able to run on both little- and big-endian >> platforms. The split stw's mean
2008 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] customized output of double load/store on ppc32
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: >>> I'm using the PPC backend's output as the "bytecode" for an interpreter >>> that I
2003 Nov 28
2
[PATCH] update crt0.S on ppc32
The _start stuff was changed some time ago, but ppc was not updated. This fixes klibc for me. I'm not sure what to do with the second arg to __libc_init, so I set it to 0.. However, looking at other static binaries, there is more stuff todo. diff -p -purNx linux -x '.*.d' -x syscalls -x socketcalls y/klibc-0.87/klibc/arch/ppc/crt0.S klibc-0.87/klibc/arch/ppc/crt0.S ---
2013 Nov 19
2
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] PPC64 regressions
Hi, Its that time of the year again. Here is the results on openSUSE 13.1 PPC64. Total of 3 failures which seems to be due the same problem (the value in brackets is the time counter from the build system): [ 3468s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc32-vacopy.ll:21:10: error: expected string not found in input [ 3468s] ; CHECK: lwz [[REG3:[0-9]+]], {{.*}} [ 3468s]
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] PPC64 regressions
İsmai, Thanks for testing these. Can you please file a bug report (and CC me on it), and attach the full output of these failing tests? (When the test fails you should see the full command -- rerun it without piping the output into FileCheck). Thanks again, Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing
2009 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] modifying llc asm output
Hi I am trying to modify the llc in that way: subf 3, 5, 3 subf 3, 5, 3 stw 3, 44(1) stw 3, 44(1) # InlineAsm Start --> isync
2012 May 02
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 17:47 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > By default it should build for > > whatever the current host is (no special flags required). To > > specifically build for something else, use: > > -ccc-host-triple powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu > > or > > -ccc-host-triple
2016 Jan 26
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:16:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:03:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > PPC Overlapping Group-B sets version 4 > > > > "" > > > > (*
2016 Jan 26
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:16:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:03:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > PPC Overlapping Group-B sets version 4 > > > > "" > > > > (*
2006 Oct 05
2
Issues after Samba updating a Samba PDC to 3.0.23c
Hi, last Saturday we reinstalled our fileserver to setup redundancy using DRBD and Heartbeat. We also upgraded Samba to 3.0.23c, which is acting as a PDC. We are using OpenLDAP to store accounts. I populated the OpenLDAP database using a LDIF file that I created on the old server before shutting it down. I also transfered all Samba tdb files to the new server. Everything went pretty
2011 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Too many load/store in Machine code represtation
There are a lot of load/store instructions for accessing variable in stack slot. The following message is use "llc -march=ppc32" command and dump from MachineFunction. %reg16384<def> = LWZ 0, <fi#6>; mem:LD4[%b] GPRC:%reg16384 %reg16385<def> = LWZ 0, <fi#5>; mem:LD4[%c] GPRC:%reg16385 %reg16386<def> = ADD4 %reg16384<kill>,
2016 Jan 26
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:41:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:28:45AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:54:01AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:24:32AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > See my earlier reply [1] (but also, your WRC Linux example looks more > > > > like a
2016 Jan 26
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:41:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:28:45AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:54:01AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:24:32AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > See my earlier reply [1] (but also, your WRC Linux example looks more > > > > like a
2016 Jan 15
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > And the stuff we're confused about is how best to express the difference > > > and guarantees of these two forms of transitivity and how exactly they >
2016 Jan 15
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > And the stuff we're confused about is how best to express the difference > > > and guarantees of these two forms of transitivity and how exactly they >
2016 Jan 26
5
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > >
2016 Jan 26
5
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:42:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:27:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:46:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:13:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > >
2016 Jan 26
1
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:10:10PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:06:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:41:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:28:45AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:54:01AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > On
2016 Jan 26
1
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:10:10PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:06:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:41:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:28:45AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:54:01AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > On