similar to: [LLVMdev] Embedding LLVM

On Jul 17, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Eugene Lazutkin wrote: > I am evaluating LLVM for my project to drive an embedded language. > Does > anybody have any pointers on where to start? Most notably: > > 1) How to interface to it? > 2) How submit a program for an execution? > 3) How to plug in a GC, or use an existing one? > > I am pretty sure that these topics were thoroughly

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Rui Ueyama" <ruiu at google.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:22:00 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Embedding LLD version to executables > > > > On Oct 18, 2016, at 6:44

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 18, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > I'd like to make LLD embed version information so that we can determine > if an executable was created by LLD and if that's the case which version of > LLD. >

Hi, > Scenario 1: you added -fuse-ld=lld to your command line, but you are suspecting that the option is ignored. Currently, it's actually surprisingly hard to tell if an output was created by LLD. Can't you use -v to see what linker the compiler driver invoked? On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18,

Hi Eugene, Sorry for the delayed reply. Custom relocations weren't something I had in mind when I designed Orc, so they raise some interesting design questions which I don't have good answers to yet. (E.g. The interface for the Orc layer concept assumes that there's a RuntimeDyld instance embedded at the bottom of the stack. That's why addModuleSet takes a MemoryManager and

Yes, I’m handling all internal and external relocations manually in NotifyLoadedFtor and I already verified that I get the behavior I need if I comment out the call to resolveRelocations. I would like to reuse ObjectLinkingLayer::addObjectSet (which eventually calls RuntimeDyld::loadObject), which has the right calls to the memory manager and also RuntimeDyld::registerEHFrames. I understand that

I see. I assumed it runs binutils directly. Eugene On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Eugene Toder wrote: > >>> The clang driver generally uses an installed gcc to do the assemble >>> and link steps at the moment. >> >> gcc? I thought it uses binutils. > > > The gcc

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Rui Ueyama" > <ruiu at google.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:38:57 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Embedding LLD version to executables >

Hi Eugene, Skipping the call to resolveRelocations would disable many (if not all) internal relocations too. Is that the desired behavior? At that point there's not much left for RuntimeDyld (or the ObjectLinkingLayer) to do. Would something like a NoopLinkingLayer be a workable solution? Cheers, Lang. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Eugene Rozenfeld < Eugene.Rozenfeld at

Hi guys! I need configure one command exec with onlyif parameter. I want test file size exist or no. Ho i do this? Tks in advanced. Douglas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi Lang, Yes, I can return a non-zero marker value. Are you ok with this version? void RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols() { while (!ExternalSymbolRelocations.empty()) { StringMap<RelocationList>::iterator i = ExternalSymbolRelocations.begin(); StringRef Name = i->first(); if (Name.size() == 0) { // This is an absolute symbol, use an address of zero.

Hi Lang, It turns out I also need an ability to tell the object linking layer not to apply any relocations. I need to skip this step below. The only way I can see I can achieve that is by creating my own ObjectLinkingLayer that would duplicate almost all of orc::ObjectLinkingLayer. I’d like to avoid that. An alternative it to pass a flag to orc::ObjectLinkingLayer constructor and

Hi Lang, Can you please let me know you think it would be right to modify RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols to allow resolvers to return 0 addresses? Something like this would be ideal for me: void RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols() { while (!ExternalSymbolRelocations.empty()) { StringMap<RelocationList>::iterator i = ExternalSymbolRelocations.begin(); StringRef

Eugene, how about below? $ clang clangtest.cpp `llvm-config --ldflags --libs core` (I guess linking order would be) 2012/7/18 Eugene <code_ep at yahoo.com>: > The output of `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core support` and > `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core` is the same. I've also tried specifying -lLLVMSupport manually. Same result. > > --Eugene >

I suspect the problem is that dovecot tries to report LDAP error over GSSAPI. So the best fix is to make sure your LDAP server does not return error. =) Aki On 15.8.2019 14.56, Eugene Bright wrote: > That's right. > GSS-API is not used anywhere else. > Do you like to inspect my full configuration? > I can dump connection session and send pcap file here. > > On August 15,

I have a .csv table named mailing.csv as below. It consist a receiver, subject and sender. Receiver subject sender 1 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117] Composable services Tom White 2 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117] Composable services Tom White 3 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117] Composable services Adrian Cole 4 Adrian Cole RE: [WHIRR-117]

Hi, I have a table with data, as below: dput(table): structure(list(Adrian.Cole = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Alison.Wong = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Andrei.Savu = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Bruno.Dumon = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Edward.J..Yoon = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Eugene.Koontz = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Jakob.Homan = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L), Kelvin.Kakugawa = c(0L, 0L,

The output of `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core support` and `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core` is the same. I've also tried specifying -lLLVMSupport manually. Same result.  --Eugene ----- Original Message -----  Hi Eugene, >I do this, and I've tried a few variations of on it: >clang++ `llvm-config --cppflags --ldflags --libs core` -o clangtest

I'd like to make LLD embed version information so that we can determine if an executable was created by LLD and if that's the case which version of LLD. ld.bfd doesn't seem to embed any information, so we cannot tell whether an executable was linked by ld.bfd or not easily. ld.gold embeds a string "GNU gold <version>" as ".note.gnu.gold-version" section

> On 15/08/2019 00:34 Eugene via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > The next combination of parameters makes 100% LDAP connections unsuccessful (the log snippet form the previous mail). > sasl_bind = yes > sasl_mech = gssapi > tls = yes > > Looks like this combination is utterly incorrect and should be prohibited (tls must not be used when mech is