similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Mach-O Identify File Type

On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > An improved Mach-O file type detection for sys::IdentifyFileType() > This patch add supports for single architecture mach-o files (the > current implementation only support Universal Binary), and solve the > signature conflict between java class and Universal Binary magics. > > Note that this function will always

Le 26 juin 08 à 07:17, Chris Lattner a écrit : > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > >> An improved Mach-O file type detection for sys::IdentifyFileType() >> This patch add supports for single architecture mach-o files (the >> current implementation only support Universal Binary), and solve the >> signature conflict between java class and

On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > An improved Mach-O file type detection for sys::IdentifyFileType() Odd, your message doesn't verify.

What do you mean ? Le 26 juin 08 à 21:25, Mike Stump a écrit : > On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: >> An improved Mach-O file type detection for sys::IdentifyFileType() > > Odd, your message doesn't verify. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >

On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > What do you mean ? The message that was sent was signed, that signature didn't validate with my signature checker. Could be my mail reader, could be the list software, could be something else.... just thought you'd like to know. Be curious if it validated for others, or if it's just me.

Hi, I have written a ModulePass (c++ code) that does transformation to LLVM bytecode. How do I build,compile and run it on windows. a) I need Win32 LLVM tools. (so I downloaded)b) How do I build the dll( modulepass) so that I can pass it to optimizer or other llvm tool.c) To test, I need to compile a test C code, emit llvm intermediate code and pass it to optimizer so  that it can run my

On 11/28/2012 03:47 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 28 nov. 2012 à 15:07, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I just realized non of Patrik's commit mails has every reached llvm-commits. Neither my own archive nor the web interface contains commit messages for any of his commits. The relevant commits are >> >> 168785,

Hi Jean-Daniel, thank for ur fast answer, i have fixed this error, another function was defined inside llvm source code. So, my only problem now is, I cannot create the file "configure.lib" (belongs to project "Configure"). I can build this project without error, but it didn't generate the lib data ?! Can you build this file ? if yes, I will be very happy if you send it to

Hi Jean-Daniel On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org>wrote: > > Le 19 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Kenneth Uildriks a écrit : > FWIW, there is a LLVM bar camp planed in Paris the next month: > > http://barcamp.org/LLVM%20BarCamp%20Paris (French web page) > > > -- Jean-Daniel > Could you please tell me if it will be in French or

> @Patrik: would you mind to check if you are subscribed with your ericsson email address? As far as I can see, I'm subscribed to llvm-commits with the same email address used in commits (I get buildbot failure emails to the same mail account as llvm-commits messages). (BTW, why should my subscription status to llvm-commits matter?) > It would be nice to see your commit mails. Yes,

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > Thanks Dupas. I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its sources management tool. It's not easy to deploy ko source into target machine, and it's more

Hello, I didn't managed to isolate the problem exactly, but I have some projects that crash (EXC_BAD_ACCESS) at launch time if I compile them using clang and integrated-as. After some svn update -r, I managed to find the culprit change. This is the commit r107943. I will try to find more info about what goes wrong. -- Jean-Daniel

Hi Jean-Daniel, Thank I use VC++ 9 (express version). I have also an error in TableGen: The "strtoll" could not be found under win32. Have you fixed it ? Regards Quang -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Jean-Daniel Dupas Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juni 2008 22:00 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Hi Chris and John, You are listed as administrators for llvm-commits. Can you provide some help in this issue: that my LLVM svn commit messages do not reach llvm-commits? /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Patrik Hägglund H Sent: den 28 november 2012 22:19 To: Tobias Grosser Cc:

AFAK, the Configuration project does not generate any output. It just patch and generate some required header file. Le 1 juil. 08 à 17:32, Le Anh Quang a écrit : > Hi Jean-Daniel, > thank for ur fast answer, i have fixed this error, another function > was > defined inside llvm source code. > So, my only problem now is, I cannot create the file "configure.lib" >

Hello, I'm having trouble configuring the submission proxy. I have configured the submission service as follow: submission_host = smtp.example.com submission_relay_host = localhost submission_relay_port = 8587 submission_relay_rawlog_dir = /var/log/dovecot/ submission_relay_trusted = yes My main issue is that until I login, dovecot-submission won't connect to the backend and query the

Hi, I'm playing with the new events, and encounter some issues: First the 'auth_request_finished' event is documented as having a 'successful' field, but in the code, the field is defined as 'success' (e->add_str("success", "yes")). But more important, in the function "auth_request_success_continue()" (auth/auth-request.c:288),

Le 20 oct. 2009 à 10:27, Artur Pietrek a écrit : > Hi Jean-Daniel > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org > > wrote: > > Le 19 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Kenneth Uildriks a écrit : > FWIW, there is a LLVM bar camp planed in Paris the next month: > > http://barcamp.org/LLVM%20BarCamp%20Paris (French web page) > > > --

It gave me some hard time, but I managed to build a reduced show case: Must be compile in i386: clang -arch i386 -o crash TestAppDelegate.c ./crash Segmentation Fault -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TestAppDelegate.c Type: application/octet-stream Size: 657 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:14:57PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas > <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > > > Thanks Dupas. > > I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its > sources