similar to: [LLVMdev] using dynamic libraries from bytecode?

On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:48 AM, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > Is it possible to use dynamic library (*.so *.dll) from bytecode? > If "yes" - how? dlopen? That's be one way. Also, most systems have shared libraries in /usr/lib and these routines are meant to be linked against and used. For example, on darwin, there sinf is resolved from a shared library, you declare it and

Mike Stump wrote: >> Is it possible to use dynamic library (*.so *.dll) from bytecode? >> If "yes" - how? > > dlopen? That's be one way. Also, most systems have shared libraries > in /usr/lib and these routines are meant to be linked against and > used. For example, on darwin, there sinf is resolved from a shared > library, you declare it and call it, as

On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > $ llvm-gcc.exe -I/mingw/include gcd_ui.c -L/mingw/lib -lgmp -o > gcd_ui.ll -emit-llvm -S Use > $ llvm-as gcd_ui.ll -o gcd_ui.bc Use llc gcd_ui.bc and then llvm-gcc.exe gcd_ui.s -L/mingw/lib -lgmp?

On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Yaroslav Kavenchuk wrote: > Mike Stump wrote: >>> Is it possible to use dynamic library (*.so *.dll) from bytecode? >>> If "yes" - how? >> >> dlopen? That's be one way. Also, most systems have shared libraries >> in /usr/lib and these routines are meant to be linked against and >> used. For example, on

Chris Lattner wrote: >> $ lli gcd_ui.bc >> ERROR: Program used external function '__gmpz_init_set_ui' which could >> not be resolved! >> >> This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an >> unusual way. >> Please contact the application's support team for more information. > > Try: lli -load /path/to/foo.so gcd_ui.bc

Is it possible to use dynamic library (*.so *.dll) from bytecode? If "yes" - how? -- WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk.

mingw, llvm 2.6 (buid with llvm-gcc) Example source code: http://npcontemplation.blogspot.com/2008/06/secret-of-llvm-c-bindings.html I change LLVMCreateJITCompiler(&engine, provider, &error); to LLVMCreateJITCompiler(&engine, provider, 3, &error); $ llvm-gcc `llvm-config --cflags` -c fac.c $ g++ `llvm-config --libs --cflags --ldflags core analysis executionengine jit

you want to use the execution engine and JIT but do not put them in the llvm-config line?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091106/d26a0a02/attachment.html>

Hi all, I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: > Error opening > '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so': > /home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so: > undefined symbol: _ZNK23Parma_Polyhedra_Library13PIP_Tree_Node2OKEv >

On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 10:11:25 (+0100), Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jorge, >> >> > I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, >> > bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: >> > >> >> Error opening >> >> '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so':

Hi Jorge, > I'm trying to use the PPL (Parma Polyhedra Library, > bugseng.com/products/ppl) in one of my LLVM passes getting the error: > >> Error opening >> '/home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so': >> /home/jorge/SvnReps/Systems/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/lib/MyAnalysis.so: >> undefined symbol:

If I understand correctly, in order to have the smb.conf file applied you need to restart smbd. Is "service smbd reload" sufficient (which does a "killproc smbd -HUP")? Will this kill any active connections to samba resources causing user disruption? Or is this a seamless process that can be carried out midday? I ask because if I need to kill all user connections to

Hola a todos, No he podido encontrar la solución para el siguiente error al instalar el paquete dplR: > install.packages("dplR") Installing package into ‘/home/milagros/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.1’ (as ‘lib’ is unspecified) also installing the dependency ‘gmp’ probando la URL ' http://r.mirror.mendoza-conicet.gob.ar/src/contrib/gmp_0.5-11.tar.gz' Content type

I am unable to install the gmp package on an x86_64 (Xeon) machine. I have had the same problem with other packages (eg. MCMCpack) as well. I am running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.1. I get the following error: g++ -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o gmp.so biginteger.o biginteger_operator.o bigintegerR.o bigrational.o bigrational_operator.o bigrationalR.o factor.o -L/usr/local/lib/ -lgmp /usr/bin/ld:

I can't get tinc to complete the configure script. It can't find the gmp 3.0.1 libraries even though they are installed. I saw a fix mentioned in the list archives, but it didn't work. Can anyone else help me out? Thanks John - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site: http://ftp.nl.linux.org/pub/linux/tinc/

Hi Neil, I admit that at this point I haven't considered the implications of the license MPFR is under, and at the moment I'm sticking my head in the sand until and unless we want to go down this path. My expectation is that we would use their exposed API - so we'd #include <mpfr.h> and use functions from there, linking against -lmpfr and -lgmp. I admit that this option would

Hello all; Has anyone installed samba4 from sources (samba-4.12.3.tar.gz) on CentOS 7? I explain the problem: to install samba-4.12.3 you need to install a version equal to or greater than 3.4.7 of gnutls; this (gnutls) depends on nettle and gmp. I am trying to install gnutls-3.6.14; I already have gmp (gmp-6.2.0) and nettle (nettle-3.6) installed (compiled from sources), but gnutls

Hi Jack, > It is interesting though that LLVMPolly.so shows the linkage... > > /sw/opt/llvm-3.2/lib/LLVMPolly.so: > /sw/lib/libisl.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.0.0) > /sw/lib/gmp5/libgmp.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.5.0) > /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 169.3.0) >

Hi: I'm trying to reproduce an arbitrary precision constant from 'Why and How to Use Arbitrary Precision' (Ghazi et al., COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING May/June 2010; http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/philippe.theveny/cise.pdf): d = 173746a + 94228b ? 78487c where: a = sin(1022), b = log(17.1), and c = exp(0.42). Ghazi et al. report: d = ?1.341818958e?12 whit IEEE-754 quadruple

On x86-64 linux, in stage 2, I get: c++ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \ fortran/arith.o fortran/array.o fortran/bbt.o fortran/check.o fortran/data.o fortran/decl.o