similar to: [LLVMdev] x86-64 linux llvm-gcc broken

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] x86-64 linux llvm-gcc broken"

2008 Jun 17
0
[LLVMdev] x86-64 linux llvm-gcc broken
I think this is fixed. Please try again. Evan On Jun 17, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > My nightly tester reports that it failed to bootstrap today: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs > Bootstrap comparison failure! > ./c-cppbuiltin.o differs > ./real.o differs > ./build/genautomata.o
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the
2008 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] ICE while building llvm-gcc
I'm on OSX 10.5, trying to build a svn checkout of llvm-gcc. I've also checked out llvm. Both are synced to r61075. I'm using Apple's gcc 4.0.1: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-apple-darwin9 Configured with: /var/tmp/gcc/gcc-5488~2/src/configure --disable-checking -enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/share/man --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++
2009 Feb 12
4
[LLVMdev] problems running test suite (-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns)
I'm trying to run some of the test suite using the instructions here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#quicktestsuite I've built llvm myself, but I'm using pre-built binaries of llvm-gcc (from http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5-x86-linux-RHEL4.tar.gz). Here's what happens: foad at debian:~/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk$ ./configure
2011 Oct 13
5
[LLVMdev] Reminder: LLVM 3.0 Branching Friday!
This is just a reminder to say that we will be branching for the LLVM 3.0 release Friday! 07:00:00 p.m. Friday October 14, 2011 PDT 02:00:00 a.m. Saturday October 15, 2011 GMT Now is the time to look at the buildbots and see what fixes they need: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console As of this writing, we have: • several test failures on llvm-gcc self-host:
2008 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] ICE while building llvm-gcc
Thanks for the quick answer! Syncing to r61112 got rid of the ICE, but I still get the following error: make "DESTDIR=" "RPATH_ENVVAR=DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH" "TARGET_SUBDIR=i686-apple-darwin9" "bindir=/Users/jyasskin/src/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/obj/../install/bin" "datadir=/Users/jyasskin/src/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/obj/../install/share"
2011 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] Reminder: LLVM 3.0 Branching Friday!
Hi Bill, > As of this writing, we have: > > • several test failures on llvm-gcc self-host: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-gcc-i386-linux-selfhost/builds/25 I can reproduce this here. I'll poke at it this weekend sometime. > • a miscompile in one of the llvm-gcc testers: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-x86_64-linux-checks/builds/55 > >
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
On Apr 27, 2007, at 3:50 PM, David Greene wrote: > The saga continues. > > I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with > the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 > of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: > > > warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs > >
2009 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] problems running test suite (-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns)
Hello, Jay > I guess this is because the test suite is trying to run "llvm-gcc > -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns", which never seems to work, because > llvm-gcc mangles the command line before it gets to cc1plus. That's correct. The driver changes the order of the options provided. You need to provided this option to cc1 / cc1plus directly > Is it just me having this
2009 Feb 12
1
[LLVMdev] problems running test suite (-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns)
Hi, > > I guess this is because the test suite is trying to run "llvm-gcc > > -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns", which never seems to work, because > > llvm-gcc mangles the command line before it gets to cc1plus. > That's correct. The driver changes the order of the options provided. > You need to provided this option to cc1 / cc1plus directly Dan fixed this
2004 Aug 03
2
[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver [high-level comments]
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > I admit a bias here: I've worked with MS style INI files. They didn't > leave a good impression with me. However, they do fit the bill for a lot > of applications. What do you envision a typical INI file to look like? I was thinking of something simple like this: [.c] compile = cc1 %in -o %out optimize = gccas %in -o %out.bc link
2008 Jul 06
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] patch to compile llvm-gcc using nightly tester script(NewNightlyTester.pl)
hello every body. Here with I have attached the patch which compile the llvm-gcc using nightly tester script. This patch add the following capabilities to the NewNightlyTester.pl script. 1. Checkout the llvm-gcc4.2 source from the SVN. 2. Compile the checkout llvm-gcc4.2 source tree. 3. Gather the configure/make out put informations. 4. Add the (3) informations to the %hash_of_data hash to be
2009 Feb 12
0
[LLVMdev] problems running test suite (-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns)
Hi, > I'm trying to run some of the test suite using the instructions here: > > http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#quicktestsuite > > I've built llvm myself, but I'm using pre-built binaries of llvm-gcc > (from http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/llvm-gcc4.2-2.5-x86-linux-RHEL4.tar.gz). > > Here's what happens: the llvm testsuite (from svn, right?) uses
2008 Apr 05
4
[LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
hi all, After having some discussions in the IRC, I am trying here to come up with a proposal for GSoC 2008 for improving the llvm nightly tester[1].Following are the ideas and suggestions that came up in the discussion, if you have any comment or any other suggestion please add them to the list. I have some doubts in some places. 1. Improvements to the perl script which manage actual testing
2008 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] patch to compile llvm-gcc using nightly tester script(NewNightlyTester.pl)
hello everybody, I have added few improvements to my patch. Please review the new patch directly. Thanks! -Rajika On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <rajikacc at gmail.com> wrote: > hello every body. > > Here with I have attached the patch which compile the llvm-gcc using > nightly tester script. This patch add the following capabilities to the >
2008 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] ICE while building llvm-gcc
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs > Bootstrap comparison failure! > ./c-decl.o differs > ./cp/decl.o differs > ./df-core.o differs > ./gcc.o differs > ./i386.o differs > ./stor-layout.o differs > ./tree-pretty-print.o differs > ./tree.o differs > make[2]: ***
2004 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver [high-level comments]
I have a very simple XML document type that I use for configuring XPS systems. There's only four elements and it follows much the same kind of grouped name/value pairs that Chris is suggesting. Chris' example would be like: <configuration name="llvm"> <group name=".c"> <item name="compile">cc1 %in -o %out</item> <item
2009 Mar 25
7
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 2.5 libexec installed without program-prefix
I build llvm-gcc as: ../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program- prefix=llvm So it should install into /usr/local/... but add llvm- prefix. This is so llvm-gcc is found by llvm (http://llvm.org/releases/2.5/docs/GettingStarted.html claims that's what it is looking for) and also so there will be no conflict with system gcc. But I see:
2008 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for improving the llvm nightly tester
My main complaints about the nightly tester are: Loading the web pages is waaay tooo sllooooow The information provided is not terribly useful for tracking down bugs. What bug fixers need is environment+command line options adequate to reproduce the problem. Access to the run logs would be a good start. On Apr 4, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > hi all, > After having
2008 Mar 22
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoC project for improving llvm-test testsuite
Hello every body, Thank you all for your great suggestions and feedbacks, I'd forward the detailed proposal within couple of days. And also if I need to clarify any thing I'll ask in the list. Thanks again. Regards, Rajika On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: > > - show