similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.3 within 2.3?

LLVMers, The 2.3 branch has been created. I will now begin the pre-release testing and packaging. I will have the pre-release version tarballs and binaries ready on Monday, May 12th. I will ask you all to begin testing at that time. If you need to check out the branch before then, here is the proper command (for llvm): svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_23

Hi Tanya, Are we allowed to patch the release branch yet? 50940 should go in. Evan On May 9, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.3 branch has been created. I will now begin the pre-release > testing and packaging. I will have the pre-release version tarballs > and binaries ready on Monday, May 12th. I will ask you all to begin > testing at that

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote: >> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found >> that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does >> this mean that they are not to be used / don't work? Or is it just >> that the documentation is

Tanya Lattner wrote: > There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at > UIUC and they do not do releases of it. We have not done scheduled releases of the poolalloc source code. In the past, we have merely kept the SVN version updated with LLVM mainline (more or less). If you want to use DSA or poolalloc, I recommend that you update to the upcoming LLVM 2.6 release

There is no 2.3 release of poolalloc. This is a research project at UIUC and they do not do releases of it. -Tanya On Aug 23, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Max Stonebraker wrote: > Hello, > > How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn > command I was trying but it doesn't work: > > svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 > >

Hi Mahadevan, This looks very nice. Is there a good reason to maintain this outside of the LLVM source tree, or is this something you would like to see come in tree? - Daniel On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thought you might be interested: > > llvm-py 0.6 was released a couple of days back. This release is

Hello, How do I download the poolalloc module for llvm 2.3? This is the svn command I was trying but it doesn't work: svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/RELEASE_23 Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090823/3649d72f/attachment.html>

Hi all, Thought you might be interested: llvm-py 0.6 was released a couple of days back. This release is compatible with LLVM 2.7. Check it out at http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/. llvm-py has it's own mailing list, at http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-py. Regards, -Mahadevan. (author of llvm-py)

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > int sum(int n) > { > return n + sum(n-1); > } > > it generates this: > > define i32 @sum(i32 %n) nounwind { > entry: > %tmp2 = add i32 %n, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1] > %tmp3 = tail call i32 @sum( i32 %tmp2 ) nounwind ; <i32>

Hi, While playing around on the LLVM, I tried this code: int sum(int n) { if (n == 0) return 0; else return n + sum(n-1); } and this is what "llvm-gcc -O2" gave me: define i32 @sum(i32 %n) nounwind { entry: %tmp215 = icmp eq i32 %n, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1] br i1 %tmp215, label %bb10, label %tailrecurse.bb10_crit_edge tailrecurse.bb10_crit_edge: ; preds =

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote: >>> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found >>> that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does >>>

> Ok, I got the release_23 branch and added/removed files until it would build > without errors. I didn't have time to test the clang build, but at least this > patch will make things compile so someone else can test it. I just sent a reply to Razvan with 3 patches that I think should be merged into the release branch. I want to keep it somewhat in sync with mainline. Can you try

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:14:29PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> You can set the program-prefix to be "llvm-". We actually recommend >> this and its in the README.llvm. We do not require it though. > > I meant to bring this up: > > llvm-gcc4.0-2.1.source/README.LLVM makes no mention of > passing

>I just sent a reply to Razvan with 3 patches that I think should be merged >into the release branch. I want to keep it somewhat in sync with mainline. >Can you try applying those 3 patches and let me know if it builds for you >and what version of MSVC you have? It doesn't build. first problem is patch 51098 that adds lib\VMCore\Use.cpp and lib\Transforms\Utils\UnrollLoop.cpp

Dear All, I have finished updating the DSA and Poolalloc source code so that it compiles with the LLVM 2.6 API. If you check out the LLVM 2.6 branch (directions are in the llvmdev archives; look for the email by Tanya Lattner about the LLVM 2.6 branch), you should be able to build mainline DSA and Pool Allocation against it. If you have trouble building DSA/Pool Allocation, please email

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> > If this is an arbitrary struct, it can be quite tricky. Do you have >> > to worry about bitfields and variable sized fields (for example a >> > variable length array at the end)? What about unions? >> >> There are no bitfields, but it does have a variable length array at

> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:42:49 -0800 > From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [ANN] llvm-py 0.5 released. > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: <B7A557A7-587A-478A-AB94-B03FDA6254A8 at apple.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > > On Nov 22,

Hi. Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released. This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4 (vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available. Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/ Feedback welcome. Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.