similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm triggered a GCC bug

>> Today I've been trying to debug a weird bug that makes JIT crash with >> certain code and when using the inliner. This may sound weird, but if I >> disable the inliner, it doesn't crash. >> I include an example gdb dump below. Does something looks wrong? Do you >> think it's a bug in JIT or it's just some other piece of code that is >> writing

The code that I have written to get the function type is: const std::vector<Type *> ParamTys; ParamTys.push_back(IntegerType::getInt32Ty(Context)); ParamTys.push_back(IntegerType::getInt32Ty(Context)); ParamTys.push_back(IntegerType::getInt32Ty(Context)); ParamTys.push_back(PointerType::get(Type::getVoidTy(Context), 0)); ParamTys.push_back(PointerType::get(Type::getVoidTy(Context), 0));

(I'm quite afraid this is a dumb question, so sorry in advance) I am trying to install the package rimage to R version 2.8.1 with Ubuntu Intrepid. When I type "sudo R CMD INSTALL" I get the following error message (pasted below). I know the same problem appears here (http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-patched-linux-ix86/rimage-00install.html) but I do not know what its

i'm trying to compile the source code for the package 'rimage', and it fails after it starts compiling. I have both fftw and jpeg packages installed, and i'm currently running R 2.7.1 under gentoo x86_64. here goes the output from R while compiling the package: * Installing *source* package 'rimage' ... checking for g++... g++ checking for C++ compiler default

On May 26, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> >>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes >>> your >>> problem? >>> >>> >> Alas, it didn't fix the problem: >> > Crumbs. > >

Thanks for tracking this down! I can't seem to reproduce it on Linux, even with valgrind. Can you try out this patch and let me know whether it works? Nick Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On May 26, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >>> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: >>>

On Oct 14, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Kenneth Boyd wrote: > Mark Kromis wrote: >> Resend >> >> >> On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: >> >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I >>> usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available >>> for

I'm in a debug build with assertions turned on for llvm-2.9, and I get a segfault whenever I try to schedule one of my own immutable passes in a pass manager. It seems that one of the passes that I'm scheduling (IndVarSimplify) attempts to ask for TargetData if it's available (I'm not providing it), and that's when it segfaults. If I split that pass into it's own pass

>> I am trying to compile rseries from Whit Armstrong and a colleague of mine found a problem with using GCC4 I get the following error when compiling rseries g++-sjlj -Ic:/R/include -O2 -Wall -c Rutils.cpp -o Rutils.o Rutils.cpp: In function 'double* getColPointer(SEXPREC*, int)': Rutils.cpp:406: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*'

Hey All, I am not sure what the status of the current technology in the market and was wondering if it would be fine to ask specifically here. I am using KVM for a time now and it's great but I have couple doubts. When I am running a test on a specific VM it's mostly on 10k SPINNING disks and they seem to survive like forever now(years...). But I need to run tests on RAM only. Until

Yeah, it crashes indeed. I can reproduce the problem locally. Let me see what is going on. On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:00 PM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > In my previous test case, after add the `-fno-builtin` to clang then > build, the lld-link still has same crash as below: > > > > $ make > >

Hi Rui, We met a lld-link crash problem when build 32bits openssl1.0 with LTO in uefi firmware. We narrow down and figure out a simple test case to reproduce this problem as blow. Please advise. Thank you! $ cat main.c void TlsDriverEntryPoint () { unsigned char *ret = 0; const unsigned char cryptopro_ext[17] = {0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,

Usage of the builtin appears independent of LTO, see below. With any of -fno-builtin, -fno-builtin-memcpy, and -ffreestanding, which are all typically used to prevent usage of memcpy calls, we still always get a memcpy builtin in TlsDriverEntryPoint(). I see this even without -flto (e.g. try with just -emit-llvm). I guess it is because this memcpy is not coming from the original source, but

Hi Steven, One thing I noticed is that you are defining `memcpy`, which clang has an intrinsic with the same name. Can you try renaming it to a random name, like `foobar`, to see if the problem still exists? On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:10 AM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > I’ve submitted a BZ for this issue as below: > > > > Bug 42626 - lld-link crash when

lld should not crash in this case (so that's a bug that needs fixing), but setting it aside, did you try adding `-fno-builtin` to clang so that clang doesn't handle `memcpy` as a built-in function? On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:46 PM Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > For the test case in my previous email, if I change the `memcpy` to > `foobar` in

Akshay Jain <jivan.molu at gmail.com> writes: > I have tried it, but I always end up with some kind of error. Can you > explain how can I get a function type for function which returns void > (nothing) and it's arguments are (int, int, int, void *, void *, ...) ?? Instead of getting something to cut&paste, you would be much more enriched if the problematic code and the

I have tried it, but I always end up with some kind of error. Can you explain how can I get a function type for function which returns void (nothing) and it's arguments are (int, int, int, void *, void *, ...) ?? Thanks in advance. On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Akshay Jain <jivan.molu at gmail.com> writes: > > > I am

I just did a clean install of Fedora 9 onto a Pentium 4 machine. It is actually running SELinux enforcing, but I haven't found any errors related to that so far. It is running Samba 3.2.3-0.20. I am trying to migrate a Windows NT 4.0 domain with about 30 users and 30 computers onto a pure Samba setup, using Samba as the PDC and tdbsam. I have read the HOWTO guide extensively, and

Hello, I did a little experiment modifying LLVM to be able to use alias-analysis information in scheduling so that independent memory operations may be reordered. Attached is a patch which implements this. I copied some routines from DAGCombiner.cpp for using SDOperands with alias queries; it should probably be factored out somewhere so the code can be shared. I reorganized

Steps to reproduce: - Enable CLucene FTS in Dovecot; - Open mailbox with MUA; - Search for message with any text; - IMAP session crash. OS: Gentoo Base System release 2.6 Version: FTS: dev-cpp/clucene-2.3.3.4-r6 IMAP: net-mail/dovecot-2.3.2.1 LIBC: sys-libs/musl-1.1.21 Dovecot FTS config: plugin { fts = lucene fts_lucene = whitespace_chars=@. normalize no_snowball fts_autoindex=yes