similar to: [LLVMdev] Patches for Solaris on x86 solaris

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Patches for Solaris on x86 solaris"

2009 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Hi Nathan, > The latter being what GenLibDeps.pl expects to see. All else being > equal though, it might be better to change GenLibDeps.pl to recognize > the first version: > --- GenLibDeps.pl (revision 78653) > +++ GenLibDeps.pl (working copy) > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ > print " <dt><b>$lib</b</dt><dd><ul>\n";
2009 Aug 19
2
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > >> The latter being what GenLibDeps.pl expects to see. All else being >> equal though, it might be better to change GenLibDeps.pl to recognize >> the first version: >> --- GenLibDeps.pl (revision 78653) >> +++ GenLibDeps.pl (working copy) >> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ >> print "
2009 Aug 11
6
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Hi all, I've encountered a couple of minor build issues on Solaris that have crept in since 2.5, fixes below: 1. In lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp, there is: // Check if building with -fPIC #if defined(__PIC__) && __PIC__ && defined(__linux__) #define ASMCALLSUFFIX "@PLT" #else #define ASMCALLSUFFIX #endif Which causes a link failure due to the non-PLT
2016 Aug 01
4
OpenSSH 7.3p1 can't be build on Solaris 10
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 configure:17280: result: no configure:17300: checking for mblen configure:17356: gcc -o conftest -O3 -m64 -mtune=native -pipe -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-result -fno-strict-aliasing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ftrapv -fno-builtin-memset
2005 May 12
2
Solaris 10 on amd and R-2.1.0
Hi I am having problems compiling R on a Solaris 10 opteron box we have on trial. checking for Fortran libraries of g77... -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/lib - L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.3.2 - L/usr/ccs/bin -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc- solaris2.10/3.3.2/../../.. -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s -lfrtbegin: - lg2c: checking how to get verbose linking output from
2010 Jun 22
3
[LLVMdev] Error building with Mingw on Win7
Hello everyone, I've run across a problem building LLVM 2.7 with Mingw on Win7. When I try make VERBOSE=1, it churns away happily for a while and then produces: /c/Perl/bin/perl /c/Programs32/llvm-2.7/utils/GenLibDeps.pl -flat /c/Programs 32/llvm-2.7/obj/Release/lib "/mingw/bin/nm" > /c/Programs32/llvm-2.7/obj/tools/ llvm-config/LibDeps.txt.tmp 'c:' is not recognized as
2008 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: >> I'm seeing a failure related to circular library references while >> building LLVM with CMake and MSYS. This didn't happen on the >> past. Building with the configure script works, so it seems something >> related to CMake. Do you have any insight on this? >> > I'll get back on this tonight or
2006 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] mingw binary is corrupt
SevenThunders wrote: > > > Someone reported this earlier but the situation remains unchanged. > > -Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > Thanks for getting it back up so quickly. Now if I
2009 Nov 10
1
compiling R-2.10.0 on solaris - lib_I_dbg_gen.so.1: version `DBG_GEN_5.1' not found
Hi, I'm having trouble compiling R-2.10.0 (R-patched_2009-11-02.tar.gz) on solaris 10 and am hoping for some advice. I'm getting errors about having the wrong version of lib_I_dbg_gen.so.1 ("version `DBG_GEN_5.1' not found"), when it gets to the step of compiling recommended packages (cluster). I think we do have the right version of lib_I_dbg_gen.so.1 on the
2008 Feb 08
1
Building NUT 2.2.1 under Solaris 10 (SPARC)
I'm trying to build NUT 2.2.1 on a SunBlade 2000 running Solaris 10 (Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC) It won't compile. I'm not a programmer, so I'm afraid I don't know why... [huge at anubis ~/Prog/nut/nut-2.2.1]: ./configure --with-user=ups --with-group=nutNetwork UPS Tools version 2.2.1 checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 checking host system type...
2007 Mar 16
1
Problem installing R onto Solaris 2.10 system - need advice!!!!!
Dear R-Help friends, I am unable to get the latest version of R (2.4.1) to compile on my solaris 10 system - has anybody else experienced this problem and are you able to offer me any advice? I appreciate your time, many thanks, Jenny Barnes Here are my CURRENT specifications: platform sparc-sun-solaris2.10 arch sparc os solaris2.10
2008 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > > [snip] > >> My internal priority for that CMake patch is low, as I need only minimal >> patching to use the autoconf-generated configure script to build LLVM. >> Right now it's just llvm.config.in.in that needs patching (the failsafed >> GenLibDeps.pl script went in
2008 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: >>> * I am seeing desynchronization between the configure-generated >>> Makefiles and the CMakeFile.txt files. [e.g., llc; makefile doesn't >>> have asmprinter, CMakeFile.txt does]. That much I should be able to >>> construct a patch for "blind", if no-one gets to it first. >>>
2010 Aug 06
3
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] [Patch] a utils/GenLibDeps.pl patch for running it on Windows
Hi I found utils/GenLibDeps.pl cann't run on Windows, so I fix it, made a patch on svn-110435. I submit this patch, hope it can be accepted. Thanks for your time. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100806/d2e10f3e/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A
2009 Mar 10
1
foreign package install on Solaris 10 + R-2.7.1
Hello, I've been having trouble installing package "spdep" for R-2.7.1 on our Solaris 10 (sparc) server. Namely the two dependencies for this package do not install properly: "foreign" and "maptools" I understand that Solaris 10 may not be an officially supported platform but any help/feedback you can offer would be most appreciated. I've updated all
2008 Jan 08
1
loading igraph package on Solaris
Hello, I'm having trouble getting the igraph package to load on Solaris. I can get igraph to compile and install from a local directory without issues using simply "R CMD INSTALL igraph", however "library(igraph)" from within R gives the following errors: Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) : unable to load shared library
2009 Aug 25
0
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
On 20/08/2009, at 1:02 AM, Kenneth Boyd wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Nathan, >> >> >>> The latter being what GenLibDeps.pl expects to see. All else >>> being equal though, it might be better to change GenLibDeps.pl to >>> recognize the first version: >>> --- GenLibDeps.pl (revision 78653) >>> +++ GenLibDeps.pl
2009 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] Build issues on Solaris
Good day Nathan, If your using the stock GCC with Solaris, I am sorry to inform you its broken, Please see: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc Please be warned as your get miss compiles and things will do strange `stuff`. As can be seen here, the reverse is true for both the GNU binutils and XPG4 versions of `nm' : -bash-3.2$ /usr/xpg4/bin/nm -p -u `find . -name
2007 Jan 30
1
Solaris 10 compilation issue
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"
2008 Oct 11
4
[LLVMdev] Genlibdeps.pl, CMake and MSYS
Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: [snip] >> That does not really surprise me about CMake, but then mingw is not a >> primary compiler on Windows, more so is VC++ or Intel, either way a >> bug should be submitted to the CMake devs. > I do not want to troll the CMake devteam, so I will not submit the bug > report without a full-blown patch. The CMake