Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT"
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
On May 21, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after
> recompiling
> llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually
> got it to
> run and pass most tests.
>
> When running, I noticed a very long runtime on the lemon test. At
> first I
> suspected an infinite
2008 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
Evan Cheng wrote:
> On May 21, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after
>> recompiling
>> llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually
>> got it to
>> run and pass most tests.
>>
>> When running, I noticed a very long
2014 May 07
2
[LLVMdev] Is it ok to nuke fpcmp and llvm-PerfectShuffle utils?
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>
> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > Cc: "Alexey Samsonov" <samsonov at google.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing
> List" <llvmdev at
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
On May 21, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> The forking was introduced because the runtime was too small;
I think this direction is wrong. I'd rather have some infrastructure
that can get nanoseconds or tick counters and print them... This then
allows for a microbenchmark suite, which I think fits in nicely with
the llvm philosophy.
2004 Sep 05
5
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
After the removal of llvm/test/Programs and insertion of llvm-test cvs
module, the nightly tester showed the following:
x86 Linux debug:
* hard to say. I think it failed because the check in occurred just
as it was starting up. Could someone verify for me? No results
were produced.
x86 Linux optimized:
* everything ran okay
* loc graph now shows 550k lines (up 350k!) - not sure
2007 Dec 18
0
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Chris Lattner wrote:
> One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the
> test suite.
I disabled optional features in clamav-config.h
>
>> 2. GPL license. Chris?
>
> Any open source license that allows unrestricted redistribution is
> fine in llvm-test
Ok, I have created a script that automatically checks out ClamAV
0.92-stable source code
2013 Jan 17
3
[LLVMdev] local test-suite failures on linux
Hi,
I get the following failures when I run the test-suite on linux (Ubuntu 12.04) using LNT (lnt runtest nt ...):
(all are execution failures)
MultiSource/Applications/Burg
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV
MultiSource/Applications/lemon
MultiSource/Applications/obsequi
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount
2014 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-test lemon
Does anyone know if this is a known xfail?
I'm getting a failure for Mips on this but at the same time,
ecmascript.y gets errors when running it through lemon for both gccx86
and llvm mips
so I don't know if the output is supposed to really compare or not.
(This test runs lemon on multiple input files and computes a hash of the
result and diffs the hash).
All inputs that are not
2013 Jan 20
0
[LLVMdev] local test-suite failures on linux
Hi,
I figured out how to resolve the failures. I noticed that Mountain Lion
includes Bison 2.3 while Ubuntu 12.04 includes Bison 2.5. I installed
Bison 2.3 from source in Ubuntu and the failures went away.
I'm a little concerned that the bison version fixed all the failures I was
seeing. To my knowledge the only failing test that depended on bison was
Burg. It almost looks like one failure
2007 Dec 18
3
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Evan Cheng wrote:
> We always welcome more tests. But it looks like there are two issues
> here.
>
> 1. The autoconf requirement. Is it possible to get one configuration
> working without the need for autoconf?
One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the test
suite.
> 2. GPL license. Chris?
Any open source license that
2013 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] local test-suite failures on linux
There is almost certainly a bug in lnt or the makefiles.
I changed the body of Burg main to the following:
+ printf("Hello World\n");
+ return 0;
I re-ran the test-suite again and got the following errors:
--- Tested: 986 tests --
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg.execution_time (494 of 986)
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.execution_time (495 of 986)
FAIL:
2008 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Hi Edwin,
I ran into two problems.
1. Using your config file and Makefile, I ran into issue compiling
with gcc:
gcc -I/Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/
Applications/ClamAV -I/Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/projects/llvm-test/
MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV -I/\Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/include -I/
Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/projects/llvm-test/include -I../../..//include
2013 Sep 08
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
Hello all,
I have done some basic experiments about Polly canonicalization passes and I found the SCEV canonicalization has significant impact on both compile-time and execution-time performance.
Detailed results for SCEV and default canonicalization can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/32 (or 33, 34)
*pNoGen with SCEV canonicalization (run 32): -O3 -Xclang -load
2013 Feb 19
4
[LLVMdev] ARM LNT test-suite Buildbot
Hi Folks,
Looks like our LNT ARM buildbot with the vectorizer is running and
producing good results. There are only 11 failures:
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg.execution_time (1 of 1104)
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.execution_time (2 of 1104)
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon.execution_time (3 of 1104)
FAIL:
2011 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
A big compile time regression. Any ideas?
Ciao, Duncan.
On 22/07/11 19:13, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>
> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/253/
> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
> Name curlew.apple.com
>
> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
> Current 253 0 2011-07-22 16:22:04
2011 Jan 12
1
[LLVMdev] About test suits
I have built and configured the test suits as told at
http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#testsuite.
The llvm is built with configuration:
SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=INS_DIR --enable-debug-runtime
--disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols --enable-assertions
This configuration is used again in the re-configure process. However, after
the re-configure process, the following "make"
2004 Nov 10
2
[LLVMdev] All SingleSource and MultiSource tests failed at FreeBSD
All SingleSource and MultiSource tests failed in last run of FreeBSD
nighttester (and in previous).
Mostly with error:
---8X---------------------
gcc -O3 Output/2002-05-02-CastTest3.llc-ls.s -lm -o
Output/2002-05-02-CastTest3.llc-ls
/var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.text+0x14): In function `main':
: undefined reference to `__llvm_getGlobalCtors'
/var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.text+0x2b): In function
2006 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] Multisource Test Failures?
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing tests in the Multisource/Applications directory
failing with something looking like this:
/Users/wendling/llvm/llvm.obj/Debug/bin/gccld -L/Users/wendling/llvm/
llvm-gcc4.install/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0/3.4-llvm -L/
Users/wendling/llvm/llvm-gcc4.install/lib Output/siod.linked.bc -lc
-lpthread -lltdl -lm -o Output/siod.llvm
gccld: warning: Cannot
2004 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
Configure gives me these errors on FreeBSD. I'm proceding with the build anyway to see what happens. Don't worry :) It'll only take about 2.5 hours instead of 30+ now.
install: ../test/Programs/Makefile does not exist
config.status: executing test/Programs/Makefile.programs commands
install: ../test/Programs/Makefile.programs does not exist
config.status: executing
2013 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I have done some basic experiments about Polly canonicalization passes and I found the SCEV canonicalization has significant impact on both compile-time and execution-time performance.
Interesting.
> Detailed results for SCEV and default canonicalization can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/32 (or