similar to: [LLVMdev] Assembling the output of llc

On May 18, 2008, at 11:51 PM, Talin wrote: > Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> Hello Talin, >> >>> Yes exactly. I'm on OS X (x86), and I'm not specifying a target - I >>> assumed that it would choose sensible defaults... >>> >> Could you please provide a .bc testcase? There can be multiple >> issues, >> but at the first glance it

Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello Talin, > >> Yes exactly. I'm on OS X (x86), and I'm not specifying a target - I >> assumed that it would choose sensible defaults... >> > Could you please provide a .bc testcase? There can be multiple issues, > but at the first glance it seems, that names were not properly mangled. > I've created bug

Here's a more specific question about compiling native code: When I use llc to generate a .s file, and then I try to assemble it using 'as', I get tons of errors - it appears to be choking on lines like the following: movl L"_tart.core.Iterable<tart.core.String>:type"$non_lazy_ptr, %eax The error I get is:

Hello, > get tons of errors - it appears to be choking on lines like the following: What is the target you're generating code for? Actually, not target (which seems to be x86), but subtarget? Is it darwin? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

I have a problem where my LLVM-generated code works on Linux but not on OS X, and the problem involves non_lazy_ptr. I have an external symbol named "@gc_safepoint_map", which is generated by the linker's GCStrategy plugin. Since it is not generated until link time, I declared it as an external symbol so that the modules that use it can compile without error. Here's what the

So, I've got a case where I am attempting to pass the address of a static symbol from a module written in Tart (the language I am working on), to a module written in C (which is part of Tart's runtime library). This works fine on Linux, but fails on OS X because the address being passed is the "non_lazy_ptr" symbol, not the symbol itself. In my .bc file, I've got code that

I recently modified my compiler's build files to use clang if it detects its available, however I'm running into a number of problems with this. I'm having one set of problems on OS X, and a different set of problems under Ubuntu. In both cases I'm attempting to link my frontend - compiled with clang - against the LLVM libraries - compiled with gcc. (I thought about compiling LLVM

I notice that when I assemble a .bc file into a .s (assembly) file, the symbol names that are generated are very different under different hosts OS's. For example, I have a symbol such as "main(tart.core.String[])->int". Under Darwin, the assembly output says "main(tart.core.String[])->int" (with quotes), but when I generate the assembly file under Linux I get

I'm still working on the next patch, it's going somewhat slowly. I wanted to create a unit test that actually created a union, and in order to do that I had to implement constant unions. And rather than creating a special syntax for constructing a union, I decided that it was simplest to implement the insertvalue instruction for a constant union expression: @foo = constant union {

Hi Ashi, > ld: illegal text-relocation to _data_table in table.o from foo in > use_table.o for architecture armv7 It looks like you're using iOS. I'm not familiar with the exact workings of that platform, but I think a similar message would occur in ELF-land. If iOS *is* comparable, your issue is that symbols in dynamically loaded objects can't (usually) be referenced directly

Here is the LangRef part of the patch. On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Talin wrote: > > I'm working on a new version of the patch. >> >> Another thing I wanted to ask about - do you prefer to have one giant >> patch that has everything, or a series of incremental patches? I can

Hi Kostya, > As far as I can see the C and C++ standards are not relevant. ASAN works on > LLVM IR, not on C or C++. Lots of different languages have LLVM frontends. I > personally turn Ada and Fortran into LLVM IR all the time for example. Clearly > the C standard is not relevant to LLVM IR coming from such languages. What > matters is how LLVM IR is

Hi All, I'm working on various cleanups and simplifications to the asmprinters. One thing that is driving me nuts is that the asmprinters currently "reverse engineer" a lot of information when printing an operand that isel had when it created it. I'm specifically talking about all the suffixes generated by isel, like $non_lazy_ptr, @TLSGD, @NTPOFF, (%rip) etc. These

Please don't be alarmed by the failed compiles on llvm-ppc-darwin. They are likely not your fault. I'm trying to get a PPC build bot setup (arxan_bellini), and so far it's dying here: Linking CXX shared library ../../lib/libgtest.dylib Undefined symbols: "vtable for llvm::raw_ostream", referenced from: __ZTVN4llvm11raw_ostreamE$non_lazy_ptr in gtest.cc.o

> And be warned that the PC doesn't point at the next instruction when you use it like this - I believe you don't need to modify it at all if you swap the pop and the .long. Bernie, is it related to ARM pipeline? I'm interesting in this, is there any other additional information? On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Ashi,

Hi Kostya, > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr > <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: > > Hi Kostya, > > > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false positive > caused by > > load widening] > > > > Once the Attribute::AddressSafety is set by clang (a separate

Anton, >> Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? > I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. Right. Maybe we should collect references and do some LLVM PIC documentation and put it on LLVM website ? >> I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF >> and MachO backends. > ABI is normally induced

Hello, Bill. > It's not exactly tweaking magic knobs. It's doing something that's > already done -- putting the information in the TAI object, and > allowing the specific back-end to set the appropriate strings. It seems to me, that simple strings / bools there are not enough :) "$non_lazy_ptr" emission is already in asm printers (in 2 places!). The

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Kostya, > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr >> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote: >> >> Hi Kostya, >> >> > [resurrecting an old mail thread about AddressSanitizer false >> positive >> caused by

Hi Bill, > Please read this proposal and send me your comments, suggestions, and concerns. this proposal looks great to me. Thanks for working on it. I have a few minor comments, see below. > //===-------------------------- > // The 'landingpad' Instruction > // > > The 'landingpad' instruction replaces the current 'llvm.eh.exception' and >