Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus"
2008 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus
Hello, Eli
> BTW, It's usually better to file a bug for this sort of thing.
I already filled a PR for this stuff. In any case instcombine shouldn't
cycle :)
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2008 May 14
1
[LLVMdev] Help needed after hiatus
Hello, Richard
> Phase: Optimization
> optimize bzip2.ubc to become an LLVM bitcode file
What's happening here? Are you running some standard LLVM tool like opt?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2008 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus
Hi,
I know my last question was very vague (i.e. "It stopped working, what
went wrong?"), so here is a little more concrete example:
If I run the optimizer (opt) on this code snippet with -std-compile-opts
the optimizer hangs.
; ModuleID = 'test.ubc'
target datalayout =
2005 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] making cygwin nightly builds available?
Hi Anton,
You're already a part of the llvm development team by participating actively
on the llvm development list :) If you wish we can put you on:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/Developers.html
Great to have you on the team, welcome!
We (Jeff, Morten, Paolo, the rest of the team and I) are looking forward to
cooperate with you and to push win32 and mingw versions even further to
stable and
2012 Oct 04
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
How can a frontend tell LLVM to put a function argument on stack/register/etc?
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote:
>> Ah, got it.
>> Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?..
> No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend.
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
>
2007 Oct 01
1
[LLVMdev] Vector troubles
I tried to ask for 32 and that didn't seem to help. MallocInst also
seemed to ignore the 16 byte directive. For now, I'm just issuing all
my loads as unaligned and that's working ok.
Thanks,
Chuck.
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Evan Cheng
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:35 AM
To: asl at
2008 May 18
1
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus
On May 17, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Richard Pennington <rich at pennware.com
> > wrote:
>> If I run the optimizer (opt) on this code snippet with -std-compile-
>> opts
>> the optimizer hangs.
wow, that's not polite :)
>>
> BTW, It's usually better to file a bug for this sort of thing.
Absolutely.
2007 Sep 28
5
[LLVMdev] Vector troubles
Chuck,
> It is dying trying to store a our working vector into one of the LLVM
> vectors created on the stack. Despite the align-16 directive on the
> alloca instruction, it is not always aligning to a 16-byte boundary.
The stack is not necessary 16 bytes aligned on linux/windows. The vector
is really sotred aligned relative to %esp, but %esp value is not good.
This is known problem
2012 Oct 04
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
> Ah, got it.
> Sounds like we might need to introduce CC_X86_Win32_MSVC_ThisCall then?..
No, we should not. It should be properly expanded in frontend.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2007 Sep 30
1
[LLVMdev] Vector troubles
Hello, Daniel.
> glibc < 2.4 don't reliably keep stack at 16 bytes through some calls
> (qsort, etc), but otherwise, it stays 16 byte aligned.
Interesting, but why in this case stuff like 'force_align_arg_pointer'
required?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2008 Sep 15
1
[LLVMdev] Prevent a intrinsic to be reordered?
Nothing... I'll show you all the info related to:
The intrinsic: def int_soru_sre : Intrinsic<[llvm_void_ty, llvm_i32_ty],
[IntrWriteMem]>;
The lower instruction (in MIPS):
class SORUI<bits<6> op, dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern,
InstrItinClass itin>: FI<op, outs, ins, asmstr, pattern, itin>
{
let isBarrier = 1; // or call,
2006 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] Error with llc after using llvm-g++ WIN32
On May 24, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Ashwin.
>
> You wrote Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 11:25:11 AM:
>
> AC> "Pass::getClassPassInfo<PassClass>() "Pass class not
> AC> registered!"" failed: file
> AC> "/cygdrive/c/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h",
> line 76
> AC> Aborted
> Same
2008 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Richard Pennington <rich at pennware.com> wrote:
> If I run the optimizer (opt) on this code snippet with -std-compile-opts
> the optimizer hangs.
>
>
> ; ModuleID = 'test.ubc'
> target datalayout =
>
2007 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] Vector troubles
You can always ask for > 16 byte stack alignment. :-)
Evan
On Sep 30, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Daniel.
>
>> glibc < 2.4 don't reliably keep stack at 16 bytes through some calls
>> (qsort, etc), but otherwise, it stays 16 byte aligned.
> Interesting, but why in this case stuff like 'force_align_arg_pointer'
> required?
>
2013 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
2013/3/27 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>:
> Hi Eric,
>
>> From my perspective Win32 is the windows ABI and mingw and cygwin are their own ABIs
> No. They are using Windows Platform ABI for almost everything (e.g.
> calling API, C runtime, etc.). At least mingw does. The differences
> are exactly in unspecified area (e.g. passing / returning structs by
>
2013 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
What if it's already broken?
2013/3/28 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>:
>> A more specific question is - if I fix some Clang i686-pc-win32
>> compatibility issue with MSVC for some language feature (e.g.
>> returning a struct),
>> should I make sure Clang i686-pc-mingw32 behavior is not changed by my
>> patches (a)
>> or should I make sure
2007 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-GCC Source Updated?
Hello, Bill.
> Has anyone gotten the latest/greatest sources from the LLVM-GCC open
> source server lately?
No. It's still at rev 319 (as of 29.04).
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2007 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] Exception Problems
Bill,
> When I try to compile on Darwin now, I get this:
Could you please provide LLVM bytecode, where bug is reproducible with
llc?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2008 Jun 06
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] add support for PIC on linux x86-64
Hello, Rafael
> With this patch I was able to bootstrap gcc in linux x86-64 with
> shared libraries enabled :-)
Awesome! But... -ENOPATCH :(
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2007 Aug 29
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: Patch for Exceptions
Hello, Bill
> It may be my lack of understanding, but it appears that having --
> enable-eh set during compilation of llvm-gcc is causing extra files
> to be compiled.
Oh, no. They are always compiled.
> They do. However, it doesn't seem to stop it from failing during
> compilation of unwind-dw2.c for libgcc -- it has
> "__builtin_eh_return" in it. During