similar to: [LLVMdev] API CHANGE: create*() --> Create

Hi all, with r49277 I have checked in the API changes for the first wave of modifications related to the size reduction of Use objects. Several creation methods take the place of the previously used "operator new". I have changed the llvm-gcc4.2 and clang projects, but if you have any llvm projects that tracks the SVN trunk of the API you will have to upgrade. in *tcsh* I have used

Hi all, this is just an early warning about an API change that is going to land on trunk in the 2.4 timeframe. Specifically the methods create*() for BinaryOperator, CmpInst and CastInst will be upper cased to be consistent with the spelling of the other instructions' creation methods. Backward compatible interfaces remain in place for a while, but will be removed before release 2.4 is

Hi, Try these scripts to build llvm and llvm-gcc. It's the ones I use and I managed to get them to work when I saw another build script using those CFLAGS. They compile llvm and stuff using only x86_64, but you can then generate code for i386 (just use a different backend). The configuration options are at the top of the scripts and they install llvm and llvm-gcc to ~/llvm. Regards,

Greetings, I am having trouble getting the Kaleidoscope example to build from tutorial #3 on Mac OS X 10.6.2. I didn't have too much trouble getting llvm-2.6 and llvm-gcc-frontend to build. Thanks for the help. Here are the steps I followed: Environment variables for build export LLVMOBJDIR=/opt/llvm export TARGETOPTIONS='--with-arch=nocona --with-tune=generic' export

On Apr 16, 2:13 am, Dan Gohman <goh... at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Gabor, > > Can you provide performance data for this? I'd > like to know what affect these changes have on > compile time. Hi Dan, Unfortunately, no. I can feed you with some speculation, though, see below. The reason why I cannot do measurements (at the moment) is that - I have no experience with

Andy, Here is the left circular shift operator patch. I apologize to the reviewer in advance. The patch has a good bit of fine detail. Any comments/criticisms? Some caveats... 1) This is just the bare minimum needed to make the left circular shift operator work (e.g. no instruction combining). 2) I tried my best to select operator names in the existing style; please feel free to change them as

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs at stdin.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been struggling with constantexprs for a bit. I'm working on a pass that > transforms global variables to local variables, and in particular the > GetElementPtrConstantExpr is a bit troublesome. For my transformation to > properly work, a global value should only be used

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 06:20 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > I've landed the patch in r324449. > > Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and > almost immediately release one of them, I would really like someone > to confirm that this patch works well with the Linux kernel. David, > if you're up for that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter

Hi all, I have a question regarding a transformation that is carried out in InstCombine, which has been introduced by r48715. It unfolds expressions of the form `zext(or(icmp, (icmp)))` to `or(zext(icmp), zext(icmp)))` to expose pairs of `zext(icmp)`. In a subsequent iteration these `zext(icmp)` pairs could then (possibly) be optimized by another optimization (which has already been there before

Hi, Nick, thanks for the reply. I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. I am trying create a new Instruction thus: %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); Value*

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:53:55AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Let's come back to this. The attached patch decouples InstSimplify from > the alias analysis and provides the conservative logic for when pointers > are not equal. Let's take the version with the cleanup from IRC. *sigh* Dealing with too many copies. Joerg -------------- next part -------------- Index:

Hi folk, I get the following stack trace and do have any clue how to fix the problem. 0 opt 0x087ecc99 1 opt 0x087ed265 2 0xb7f6a400 __kernel_sigreturn + 0 3 opt 0x086d4198 llvm::LeakDetector::addGarbageObject(llvm::Value const*) + 29 4 opt 0x0872945f llvm::Instruction::Instruction(llvm::Type const*, unsigned int,

Hi Sanjay, thank you a lot for your answer. I understand that in your examples it is desirable that `foo` and `goo` are canonicalized to the same IR, i.e., something like `@goo`. However, I still have a few open questions, but please correct me in case I'm thinking in the wrong direction. > Am 21.07.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com>: > > I've

Hi Sanjay, > Am 02.08.2016 um 21:39 schrieb Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com>: > > Hi Matthias - > > Sorry for the delayed reply. I think you're on the right path with D22864. No problem, thank you for your answer! > If I'm understanding it correctly, my foo() example and zext_or_icmp_icmp() will be equivalent after your patch is added to InstCombine.

Hi all: I am trying to get the return value of a call instruction that I inserted during the optimization pass I wrote. I have something like the following: CallInst *InitCall = CallInst::Create(InitFn, Args.begin(), Args.end(), "log_load_addr_ret", LI); CastInst *InsertedCast =

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:59:55PM -0800, Dan Gohman wrote: > The bug here isn't in clang's use of noalias or in BasicAliasAnalysis' > implementation of noalias; it's in the code that's optimizing the > icmp. Let's come back to this. The attached patch decouples InstSimplify from the alias analysis and provides the conservative logic for when pointers are not

Hello, In one of the loop transformations I am developing, I need to convert eq and neq loop latch condition into less than or greater than depending on the control flow. The problem is that CmpInst::ICMP_EQ and CmpInst::ICMP_NE are neither signed nor unsigned in LLVM. Also, I did not find a way to find out if the integer operands of the CmpInst are signed or unsigned. Apparently, LLVM does

Are the ICMP and FCMP instructions meant to accept vectors operands or no? Verifier excludes vectors, as does the AsmParser[1]. But the CmpInst constructor accepts vectors[2], and they are documented as allowed: > If the operands [of icmp or fcmp] are packed typed, the elements of > the vector are compared in turn and the predicate must hold for all > elements. — Gordon [1]

Hi Zsombor, Thanks for the patch! Unfortunately I can't apply it because the llvm API has moved from BinaryOperator::create to BinaryOperator::Create. Are you using svn head? Now on the x86_64 part. There has been very little work on porting vmkit on x86_64. If you're having compilation problems, I suppose it's in the garbage collector directory (GCMmap2). If you could make the

I need to create a cast instruction that casts an sbyte* to another pointer type. Previously I was using the CastInst::createInferredCast() function to do that; however, that function has been removed. Which of the create() functions from CastInst should I use to do that? It seems like the obdvious answer should be createPointerCast(). However, the documentation for createPointerCast