similar to: [LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application?

Am Mittwoch, den 14.05.2008, 11:27 +0400 schrieb Anton Korobeynikov: > Hello, Razvan > > > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. > That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make > the proprietary application 'derived work'. This is what the

Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I made some more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I discovered: - from FSF it seems that packaging together a GPL application and a commercial one it is a corner case of licensing. Here is what they say: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using llvm, trying to package its compiler with > GCC is a

Hi, > If you distribute the GPLed library and the proprietary application > separately, and make sure that they are linked at installation time, the > link step creates a derived work indeed but that's inconsequential > because it isn't redistributed. Interestingly enough, you need a linker at the target system to do that. And guess what this discussion started at :-p Gr.

"Razvan Aciu" <admin at kam.ro> writes: [snip] > The problem is with the gcc and binutils licence. This is GPL and [snip] I agree with Owen Anderson on this one (altough IANAL, etc). [snip] > In that respect, if someone can adapt the MASM templates to produce > NASM directives (it is the only thing that needs to be changed), these > updates will be more than

I made some researches how llvm, possibly with other tools, can be a full backend for compiler writers (with the final result being an executable file or dynamic linked library). Here are the results: A. Assemblers When I saw that the I86 target for llvm with the Intel syntax targets MASM (I tested with the MASM version from http://www.masm32.com/ ), it was a bad surprise for me. This is

Hi all, I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not implemented. Thanks & Regards, -Lokesh -- "It is not God that is worshipped but the group or authority

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 23:36 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > I don't want to discourage you, but you are basically asking for > interpretation of legal documents... > If you really really need to know the answer to questions like these, > the best bet is to hire legal council. Chris is right. I would add that it sounds like you are already getting nonsense responses. However,

Hi, I'm searching for GPLed softphones. I found WengoPhone but actually not available for Asterisk PBX, only for Wengo network. I found Kiax but only for IAX protocol. Did you know a good GPLed softphones which works on Windows ? Thanks Greg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

after creating a git clone I executed "bootstrap" and then entered "libguestfs/.gnulib/modules" and executed "grep -rn GPL * | grep ":GPL" | grep -v "build tool" > ~/GPLed" On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>wrote: > How did you construct this list? It appears to list modules which are > not

On Mon, 12 May 2008, Lokesh Kumar wrote: > I am just curious to know when will the llvm-db be released. I hope I > am posting in the right forum. In the latest release 2.2, the llvm-db > binary doesn't appear to load the symbol table or debug the bytecode. > It spits out a message saying that this feature is still not > implemented. There is no current plan (that I know of) to

Dear All, I would like to publish a function for 'heckit' estimations together with two examples from Greene's and Wooldridge's econometric textbooks. These examples use the dataset of Mroz (1987) that is also available in John Fox' "car" package. However, not all variables that are used in my examples are available in the "car" package. Therefore, I

Are there any thoughts to changing the license used by Vorbis from the GPL to the LGPL? As it stands, linking to libvorbis will taint any program. I'd like to research using Vorbis and contribute to it, but I'm not at the liberty to GPL the engine I'd like to link with libvorbis. The GPL prevents me from using it. The LGPL would still protect the Vorbis code while allowing

Are there any thoughts to changing the license used by Vorbis from the GPL to the LGPL? As it stands, linking to libvorbis will taint any program. I'd like to research using Vorbis and contribute to it, but I'm not at the liberty to GPL the engine I'd like to link with libvorbis. The GPL prevents me from using it. The LGPL would still protect the Vorbis code while allowing

Hello there. I'm seeing with a third party library vendor, wich creates components for signal and audio processing for Delphi and BCB, the way to integrate support for OggVorbis, but there are some license issues that I don't know/understand. In plain text: can he create and distribute a component that uses the code available in the Windows SDK, either in the DLL presentation and/or

Hello all, Sorry for this email not directly related to R developement. I just come from a nice demonstration session from Scitegic about their Pipeline Pilot (PP) software, and especially their 'R collection' which brings R calculations into the software (http://www.scitegic.com/documents/RStats_Collection.pdf). I looked carefully on the way they do it: they pass data from PP to R

I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium card (X100P). Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ? I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found on

Hello, I''m interested in using the mem_event API (or it''s LibVMI wrapper), but I''m interested in capturing write events anywhere in a domU guest''s memory, _and_ not just once for each page write, but every time a page is being written to. To this end, I''ve looked at the xen-access.c example, where at first all the pages are being monitored:

Hello, I''m interested in establishing a communication channel between the Xen hypervisor and a dom0 userspace application. Ideally this would be a 2-way channel, with the hypervisor asynchronously notifying this application, and then (for certain types of messages) wait for a reply from the userspace consumer. To this end, I''ve been reading xen-devel posts [1], read the