similar to: [LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Creation - NOW

On May 9, 5:37 pm, "Tanya M. Lattner" <to... at nondot.org> wrote: > LLVMers, > > I will be creating the 2.3 release branch today at 9PM PDT. During that > time, commit access to SVN will be forbidden. I will send out mail shortly > before the branch creation, and once it has been completed. Hi Tanya, I do not really understand this strict rule :-) While I get it

LLVMers, I will be creating the 2.3 release branch today at 9PM PDT. During that time, commit access to SVN will be forbidden. I will send out mail shortly before the branch creation, and once it has been completed. Thanks, Tanya

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing:

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

LLVMers, I will be creating the branch in 30 minutes (9PM PDT). At that time, I will send out mail announcing SVN commit access is suspended. Those with commit privileges should refrain from committing until I send out mail saying commit access is restored. Thanks, Tanya Lattner

Hi Tanya, Are we allowed to patch the release branch yet? 50940 should go in. Evan On May 9, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.3 branch has been created. I will now begin the pre-release > testing and packaging. I will have the pre-release version tarballs > and binaries ready on Monday, May 12th. I will ask you all to begin > testing at that

LLVMers, I am creating the LLVM 2.2 branch now. Please refrain from committing to SVN until I send mail announcing the branch has been created. Thanks, Tanya

LLVMers, Sorry for the delay in this email. The 1.8 release has been pushed out 1 week, so today marks 1 week before I create the 1.8 branch. I'm asking that all platform maintainers and available llvm developers review the nightly tester results. Please XFAIL any dejagnu tests that are currently failing, fix any warnings, and review the results of the full llvm test suite. If a test

LLVMers, The 2.3 branch has been created. I will now begin the pre-release testing and packaging. I will have the pre-release version tarballs and binaries ready on Monday, May 12th. I will ask you all to begin testing at that time. If you need to check out the branch before then, here is the proper command (for llvm): svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_23

> Hi Tanya, > > I do not really understand this strict rule :-) > While I get it from a CVS perspective, in Subversion > this is simply overkill. For making a branch you simply > select a revision X, do a "svn -rX up", test, > if successful, you do "svn info ." and use the URL > to make a repo -> repo copy: > > svn cp -rX URL BRANCHURL > >

LLVMers, It is now 1 week before I will create the 1.9 release branch. I'm asking that all platform maintainers and available llvm developers review the nightly tester results. Please XFAIL any dejagnu tests that are currently failing, fix any warnings, and review the results of the full llvm test suite. If a test failure is determined to be something that needs to be fixed before the

I'm creating the 2.0 release branch. Users with cvs commit access, please refrain from checking anything in. I will send email out once I have finished. -Tanya

Branch has been created. CVS is open again. -Tanya On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > Please refrain from comitting to cvs. I will send email once I have finished > creating the branch. > > Thanks, > Tanya > >

On May 9, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > While you are correct is is not usually a problem, that assumes that > I do > not check in any changes. If I check in X and someone checks in > something > (Y) that should not go into the release, If they are checking in something, trivially, they want it to go into the release. If they didn't want it in,

Please refrain from comitting to cvs. I will send email once I have finished creating the branch. Thanks, Tanya

Dear Tanya: > You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version > of xcode do you have installed? Xcode 2.4.1 > Can you send me the following files? > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.* > SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.* OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz) Best regards, 2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at